Comments on: Larry Sinclair On Barack Obama (NSFW)

By: nurzratchetz

nurzratchetz — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:29:48 +0000

I really encourage everyone who has any questions whatsoever, to go to this Sinclair’s website (larrysinclair0926 dot wordpress dot com) and spend a few entertaining minutes trying to find any proof with any merit whatsoever.

Now that might sound like it’s about as much fun as a nailgun to the nutsack, so let me just reassure you that it’s VERY entertaining to read what these cult members say, and I can confidently promise you that you won’t be coming after me asking for that hour of your life back.

After you fail to find anything legitimate, as I’m sure you will if you have any understanding of what constitutes reasonable proof, please please please try to ask for more details or a confirmation on some point (any point), or just try to engage Sinclair in any conversation whatsoever.

And then, you will see with completely clarity, that this guy is nothing more than a nutcase running yet another (though somewhat incomprehensible) scam on those without sufficient mental defenses to screen out such nonsense.

By: ShaneJ

ShaneJ — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:05:36 +0000

Larry Sinclair has thus far failed to produce a single viable piece of evidence. Is it any wonder nobody in the mainstream media wants to risk their career and credibility covering this farce?

I’ve been trying to get Mr. Sinclair to response to questions on his blog (simple ones, like “If you think Obama’s phone records would prove you right, why don’t you provide your phone records, they should work just as well, right?” ), but the blog is so heavily moderated that not one single real question can get through, and apparently even his own worshipers are now having a hard time posting due to overaggressive comment deletion.

I know several people who’ve tried to ask questions of Mr. Sinclair, but that is apparently not allowed on his blog, despite the fact that his blog clearly states “You may comment on any post, regardless of your position. However, please note that any and all abusive, threatening and vulgar comments and emails will result in your user name, email address and IP address being posted regardless and without the posters permission. You have been warned.” .

Small wonder, huh? The guy who wants to force Obama to answer his questions will not answer anyone else’s

I personally would love it if someone in the media just exposed this guy for the fraud he is. I’d watch that episode for certain, and I’m sure the advertisers would be well pleased by the number of viewers

By: Frannie

Frannie — Fri, 23 May 2008 01:44:27 +0000

Celina, who is the “they” that you refer to who have thoroughly investigated Barack Hussein Obama?

By: Celina

Celina — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 23:28:20 +0000

I’m surprised that people have jumped to conclusions based on whether or not you want Obama to win. As someone said, Obama has been thoroughly investigated. Heck, when a person apply for any civil service employment that is non-sensitive, they investigate them, so what do you think that they do to a presidential candidate. They would have a responsibility to investigate anything that would make the office of the president look bad. ….. It would just be difficult to believe that Obama would put himself in this kind of position. I’m sure that some of Obama’s enemies have contacted this guy and would do anything for this story to be true. I just think that we should stop and think rationallly before jumping to any kind of conclusions. Obama probably not responded because he thinks that this guy is looney and thinks that it is better to just leave this guy alone.

dr:04:25

By: Chistina

Chistina — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:10:34 +0000

What limo company did he rent from? And what day did this happen in 1999? How is it that he was able to get a limo when he was unemployed & residing in a halfway home? Can you say SWIFT? Please do some research before this ends up being another “Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim” story.

By: Naomi

Naomi — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:18:35 +0000

I believe him. He sounds credible. If not, why did whitehouse.com break the rules of their polygraph agreement? What are THEY hiding? Here’s a good article about the state of things to date:

http://savagepolitics.com/?p=274

By: Dhee Burr

Dhee Burr — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:24:25 +0000

Now I don’t believe a word of this given Sinclair’s history and condition, but in a way that’s a shame, as I personally think Barack is quite a hottie (especially for a politician), and I’d happily go for a tumble with him.

Now I do support his candidacy, but only in spirit, as I am a UK citizen, and I would much rather have Barack as the President of ‘our greatest ally’ than McCain or Hillary. But then again if he won, I suppose he would be too busy for a rendezvous. Sigh.

By: Denise W.

Denise W. — Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:57:43 +0000

People of America, do not believe this man’s lies. It’s a ploy to destroy Obama’s image simply because he’s getting too close to being the nominee for the Democratic president. If Larry Sinclair’s story was true, it would have come out long before now. Trust me, when Barack started his campaign 18 months ago, he was thoroughly investigated from childhood and if there was such a story as this in his past, the media and Clinton’s campaign people would have discovered it. Larry Sinclair is being paid by an unknown party to fabricate this story as well as publicly announce it via his You Tube video so that it seems true and legitimate. People of America, DON’T BE FOOLED BY THIS PLOY BECAUSE IT’S JUST ANOTHER HORRIFIED “KITCHEN-SINK” SCHEME AGAINST OBAMA, a Black man, who is coming to close to being our next future president.

By: Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:19:00 +0000

Larry,

Did that $5,000 check clear? We are having some debt problems, but keep up the good work, and, if you didn’t already cash that badboy, hold off on it until April 23rd.

Thanks.

Sincerely,

Hillary Rodham Clinton

By: TRUTH

TRUTH — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:29:24 +0000

larrysinclair0926 . spaces . live . com/

By: TRUTH

TRUTH — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:28:14 +0000

Larry has posted a photo shopped pic oh himself and Obama. This tells me that Larry is very serious about getting his story out to the American people. I have seen where he has been ridiculed, slammed, and even threatened. I think that if this were a lie, Larry and his story would have gone away and disappeared a long time ago. I think there is something to this story.

By: John Bryans Fontaine

John Bryans Fontaine — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:13:52 +0000

Lenaora:

‘THE TRUTH IN MEDIA DOES NOT EXIST.’

Of course, the best known theory that the Media were really one giant conspiracy is, of course, the one found in ‘Mein Kampf’. I’m sure that Hitler would have loathed Obama just as much as you Sinclair Cultists do.

My guess is that since Pat Buchanan or David Duke aren’t running for President, all the Sinclair Cultists can do in 2008 is to oppose Obama with the word of the least credible man in recent history. Larry Sinclair might make even Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard look honest.

By: lenaora

lenaora — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:25:15 +0000

I and several others are indeed constantly amazed at the way the main-stream media is keeping this buried. Their idol, fashion plate of the moment, barack, must be protected against all costs. THE TRUTH IN MEDIA DOES NOT EXIST. They are all biased and cowards. They are actually telling the people to vote for barack, and my God, the people are swallowing it hook, line and sinker, just like they did bush - and are now choking on him.

By: Polygraphia

Polygraphia — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:06:25 +0000

What if Obama does or recently did smoke crack or do cocaine?
Wasn’t that Sinclair’s REAL issue in coming forward?

I think that Sinclair completely believes this to be true or he wouldn’t have been eager for the polygraph. He should have contacted a expert polygrapher indep-endantly and underwent the exam. I have no idea why it should have taken 4 hours for the 4 questions/answers posted on the WH website. The polygraphs and their method of examining just seem to raise more questions. If Sinclair was just a fraud, he should be laughing and mocking everyone now. Yet, he is not.

Bottomline , if someone engages in these activities once, it wasn’t the only time. These people will come forward and either quietly seek to blackmail or gain attention in a big way. I think that is why this Larry Sinclair story is so well posted on various other sites. It is to troll for past drug/sex acquaintenances. Maybe there is no one, and it all has been a fantasy of Sinclair, or maybe the guy he met looked and sounded exactly like Obama, but it just wasn’t him. OTH, If there are other acquaintenances, they really should step forward now and not wait to spoil things later.

From the political standpoint, republicans seem eager to challenge Obama.
This is odd, since Clinton would be an easier candidate to beat this November.
Therefore, I suspect some republican has the “goods” on Obama either on drugs, sex, or other wrongful, illegal or suspect activity. If they do, it will be politics as usual, with the coveted October surprise………………

By: John Bryans Fontaine

John Bryans Fontaine — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:26:10 +0000

If members of the Cult of Larry Sinclair* want to go on believing in
word of a man whose credibility is lower than the keel of the
Titanic, so be it. Stating that you still believe Sinclair is a neon
sign flashing ‘Gullible Moron’ above your User ID. If Sinclair
were to blog that the Sun will rise tomorrow, General Electric’s
stock would skyrocket.

* some of whom compare Sinclair to Noah

By: Jenn

Jenn — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:24:39 +0000

No creditable Newspaper will even write about Larry Sinclair’s story because they know he’s a fraud. Most respectable news stories only report stories that have factual evidence… Look at what happened to the NY TIMES even though they had more evidence as of John McCain taking special interest money, and weird letters… but they have no evidence of him having an affair, and that’s when their story went wrong. Larry Sinclair is a joke, and he’s duped you conspiracy theorists nuts, he has a criminal record of fraud. I KNOW 100 PERCENT the judge will dismiss this.
relaw0649

By: Mark C

Mark C — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:32:35 +0000

*** just want Mr. Sinclair to recieve the respect and attention any person deserves, especially someone with nothing to gain by making such a shocking accusation ***

Wow, you’re quite the moron.

Nothing to gain? He’s attempted extortion before. Matter of public record. And now he’s failed the lie detector test administered by that web site:

http://www.whitehouse.com/NewsComments.aspx?start=10&NewsID=116#

Of course he got 10 grand just for taking it, even though he failed.

Nothing to gain? My god you are a freaking imbecile.

By: Jon

Jon — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:13:26 +0000

TST’s copy-paste of the Washington Post article “Sinclair Federal Law Suit To Be Dismissed” is a fake. There is NO such article from Washington Post. Just shows the desperation of Obama’s cronies in trying to sabotage this story.

By: Barry

Barry — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:22:48 +0000

This same gang up mentality reaped up against Mr. Sinclair reminds me of what initially happened to Noah of Noah’s Ark fame before the rain drops begin. Mr. Sinclair may just be telling the truth here. The truth should matter–regardless of Mr. Sinclair’s mental capacity or not–should we ignore a mentally ill woman should she come forward and share that a crime has been committed against her? Of course, not. We should be more intersted in the truth than trashing Mr. Sinclair. He may just be simply telling the truth here.

By: TST

TST — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:24:25 +0000

The Washington Post Editorial pg1a2;
Thursday, Feb.21 2008

Sinclair Federal Law Suit To Be Dismissed

In late fall of 2007 Lawrence Sinclair approached campaign officials of the Sen.Barack Obama campaign, and told them a very disturbing story. Rob Allen of the Sen. Obama campaign stated. After the meeting had concluded the campaign officials ruled it off, as “just someone trying to make a buck.”
The following week they received a phone call, from a man claiming to represent Mr. Sinclair, and demanding $100,000.00 as restitution for his client.

Lawrence Sinclair has filed a federal suit against Barack Obama and others for harassment since the gay man released his video on YouTube.com, a internet web-site for viewing homemade videos, alleging that, the Senator from Illinois and Mr.Sinclair shared oral sex and cocaine in the back of a Mr. Sinclair’s limo in Gurnee, IL in 1999.

The Post has learned that presiding Judge Donald Wilson is dismissing the case, due to credibility on Mr.Sinclair. Stating that the complainant has an extensive record of mischievous conduct. Further more such allegations warrant sound credible standards, which are not found in matters included in this suit.

Lawrence Sinclair was convicted of “fraud” two times and investigated eight times over 25 years, for trying to secure money for “black male” charges. Two of the defendants were political figures in Illinois and Indiana. Mr.Sinclair also has an extensive record of drug convictions. The Washington Post has learned.”