THIS is Ruben Noe Coronado. He is Spain’s first pregnant man and will be the world’s first transsexual father. He is pregnant with twins after in vitro fertility treatment.
The children will be born in September, when Mr. Coronado will be the first man in world to give birth to twins.
Ruben Noe Coronado was born a woman and named Estefania or Stephanie.
Ruben will bring the twins up with his partner Esperanza Ruiz, 43. In a nod to conservative values, they intend to marry before they become parents.
Says he:
“It’s like being born with three hands. You take advantage of them while you have them and you get rid of one of them when they get in the way.”
Will he sell pictures of the birth and babies? No. He’ll give them away.
“If I don’t do it, someone else will and they’ll make a fortune.”
Anorak readers will recalls Thomas Beatie, who gave birth to birth daughter, Susan Juliette.
Pregnancy is becoming a form of oneupmanhip.
You have a child.
She had twins.
You had IVF.
She had a litter.
We are expecting.
He had a daughter.
He had twins.
She gave birth to a unicorn…
Thomas Beatie Has It Every Way
Thomas Beatie Is A Pregnant Man
Posted: 21st, March 2009 | In: Key Posts, Strange But True Comments (39) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- Tom Jones on Fort Hood Shootings Latest News: US Soldiers Shoot 12 Dead
- anonyme on EastEnders Plot Found
- Marie on Susan Boyle Watch: Sharon Osbourne Knows A Hairy Arsehole When She Sees One
- Graeme (aka eggman) on Ringo Starr Appears In A Water Drop, Jesus Unimpressed
- Graeme (aka eggman) on Madeleine McCann: Let’s Blame The Muslims
March 25th, 2009 at 9:32 pm
Cheryl….first you made me cry with your post on memories of our dear, departed mothers…then you make me laugh your posts on gayety, gingham & god…..
I am a mere, mortal man ….with mixed up emotions…. but I humbly thank you…
for being a typical bloody woman!
March 25th, 2009 at 8:24 pm
As far as our chromosomes are concerned, a man is just a woman that got broken during development.
March 25th, 2009 at 8:19 pm
Hi Percy - best statement I’ve read in a long, long time!
March 25th, 2009 at 7:55 pm
I only have one question on most of the hysteria written above. I believe Vanessa made the statement about God having burnt a city down because of the people being ‘gay’ (her choice of word, certainly not mine). Where was the city located, Vanessa? I live in VA and I have friends who come to visit with their same sex partners - I just want to know if my city is next so I can be polite and caring and tell them best not come to visit as it seems there is a God who is full blown bigot!
March 25th, 2009 at 7:07 pm
Dairy…I was drawn to your post telling me to pull myself together….but I prefer to just hang loose, wide open & flapping in the breeze.
March 25th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
There will never be a man on this earth having a baby, SHE was born a SHE and will die a SHE regardless of what doctors say they can do… So the person having a baby is a FEMALE not a MALE…. Reporters STOP trying to get ratings by lying, call a spade a spade and nothing more….
March 25th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
People please stop printing this articles saying man having baby because these women are not men. They may have tried to attempt to make themselves men but only GOD can change humans from man to woman and vice versa. So the person that is having twins is not a man SHE is a
March 25th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Percy - I know it’s late coming but, please, just pull yourself together….
March 25th, 2009 at 10:24 am
But isn’t ‘responsibility’ the new dirty word (sadly)?
March 25th, 2009 at 10:06 am
Melissa:
I don’t care if you’re a [corrected] woman or man (or one to become another) It is your right as a person to have a child ”
No. It is not YOUR right. It is a huge responsibility which you may take on, after careful consideration, but it is NOT a ‘Right’.
To argue that, is then you have to be able to argue that the child becomes your ‘property’ and that you therefore have a RIGHT to treat the child as you wish, to bring it up in circumsntces where it will sufere physical or psychological damage, and so on.
I wish people, and media, and latter day do-gooders would stop using the word “Right’ and substitute ‘responsibility’
March 24th, 2009 at 11:46 pm
I don’t care if your woman or man (or one to become another) It is your right as a person to have a child, whether your adopting, invitro or naturally, gay or straight , married or single, in your youth or retired. Times they are changing, get over you selfishness and just be happy for who you are, and the time of medical advances that you have to chose.
Soon there will be a time where all men will be able to give birth, when that happens all women will laugh at all the fools men will be when they will want to know how it feels to have “life” growing inside them. They may still not know what labor will feel like but at lest the men will understand more of what the meaning of life truly is.
If you cant accept what people can do, use the old rule:
If you can’t say something nice don’t say anything at all!
March 24th, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Please you cannot change your genitals and call yourself something else. As far as I am aware; if you have a womb, you are a woman no matter what you look like on the outside.
If you want to be a man, then change it; take it all out, the vagina, womb, tubes… Don’t hold on to some for expediency. That’s being a coward. NO MAN HAS EVER BORN A CHILD. NO MAN. THAT’S IMPOSSIBLE.
March 24th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
This is one more reason to get used to the idea that we are in a different world all together. But i strongly believe that nature has the appropriate tools to respond to mans aggitations. I dont know wether to call you brother or sister but get to know that you can not eat your cake and have it. This is a stupid way to call for attention. Good luck.
March 24th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
It’s funny how liberals pick and choose what is right or wrong. Being gay is right even though God BURNED A WHOLE CITY DOWN FOR IT!! OK, so what’s next murder? Oh yea, we already do that to with unborn babies…. seriously people, regardless if they will be good parents or not, and they probably will be. Wrong is wrong no matter how you try to paint it.
March 24th, 2009 at 4:57 am
Any one with a kind heart has every right to have a child , either through birth or adoption, gay straight lesbians ,whatever! I agree with tashs but PLZ was way to harsh. For me god loves all his childrens, but id give the title its proper name transsexual gives birth to twins. Because she was a man at first. but people get OVER it. This is a NEW world.
March 24th, 2009 at 3:24 am
Wow, were is the world turning to:( so sad
March 24th, 2009 at 1:49 am
I dont know what everyone is freaking out about.. That man was a women and has every right to have a child. People should stop critisizing other people because they are different. People should be happy for the new parents
March 24th, 2009 at 1:39 am
SHE WAS BORN A WOMEN, SO THAT WHATS SHE IS.STOP CALLING THIS PERSON A MAN WHEN SHE IS BORN A WOMEN,A WOMEN GIVING BIRTH TO TWINS.
March 23rd, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Is it just me but don’t you need a uterus to carry a baby? And don’t you need a real vagina and a pelvis that unhooks when dilation is complete. What wrong with this story? IVF can’t make an umbilical cord connection miraculously appear. If this person had invetro what were they connecting these babies too or did they just dump them inside this man’s stomach like Jonah in the whale? Who are you fooling here?????
March 23rd, 2009 at 8:07 pm
Gi, this is from the Wikipedia entry (sorry) on ‘In God We Trust’, but I have no real reason to doubt its veracity in this case:
“…The motto In God We Trust was placed on United States coins largely because of the increased religious sentiment existing during the American Civil War. Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase received many appeals from devout Christians throughout the country, urging that the United States recognize God on United States coins. From Treasury Department records, it appears that the first such appeal came in a letter dated November 13, 1861….”
It was extended to inclusion on all currency in the 50’s as a response to the perceived threat from Communism..
March 23rd, 2009 at 7:56 pm
Gingham is Great
March 23rd, 2009 at 7:42 pm
Anocrak…please moderate me before i make any more mistakes….I just gingham seem to help myself…
Moderator - the first person singular is up to you
March 23rd, 2009 at 7:39 pm
At least you can make a lovely pair of curtains out of muslin fundamentalism….but then gay rights fundamentalism can make a pair of kids out of a pair of gingham curtains… how cool is that …
March 23rd, 2009 at 7:36 pm
mlogan,
What country do you live in? I live in the United States of America. Our Founding Fathers belived “In God We Trust” so much so, that it is on our currency and in our national Pledge. They each believed in God. They moved/emigrated to the American Colonies to escape being persecuted for their religious beliefs (ie: being Catholic/Protestant in a Protestant/Catholic nation). You are correct in who God/Jesus would reach out to when He comes back. Please remember not everyone of any religion is bad, but that every sect has bad apples.
March 23rd, 2009 at 7:25 pm
Nancy, PLZ, Helen:
What DO people like you do when your kids turn out to be gay? Do you take them out behind the woodshed and shoot them like varmints, then tell the men from the guvmint that “they are-you-enn-enn-ee-dee-oh-eff-tee”?
March 23rd, 2009 at 7:22 pm
Listen, You’ve being lying to us all along about who you really are, but the truth is revealing. You are who God made you to be . A woman. Not a male imposter. The world is full of pretenders. Its disgraceful. Ist that against the LAW.
March 23rd, 2009 at 6:23 pm
Oh no here come the bible thumpers trying to define what is rightous and what is sinful or disturbing. Thank, (whatever you believe in) that the United States was founded by people who saw that religion had no place in government. Kudos to the people who comment and saw the good of a couple raising children who will be loved. Be damned are the religious zealots that want to dictate what is right or wrong for everyone else in this world. You know the crazy thing is that if Jesus does exists I think that gays are the first group he would reach out too. Mainly because God always seeks out compassion, understanding, You know Christian fundalmentalism is just as bad as muslin fundamentalism.
March 23rd, 2009 at 6:13 pm
He is not the first transexual man to have a baby. Maybe twins, but there is a man-woman here in the UNITED STATES that gave birth before this man. Just ask OPRAH-he and his her wife were on there and they had a special on tv showing him/her giving birth!!!!
March 23rd, 2009 at 6:12 pm
god made male and female, nothing more nothing less. when god made a man no, and i repeat no man, woman, jack or jill can change that. a woman is difine by the womb that god gave her before birth. Man cannot alter that. wake up and smell the coffee. if you are a man you are a man, if you are a woman you are a woman, period. it is not up for discussion. a person who god did not put a womb in cannot give birth. stop the madness please.
March 23rd, 2009 at 5:09 pm
this is sad because 1st you want to become a man 2nd you want to do women things like carry a child…… why cant you make up your mind and stick to one thing. I have no problem with people wanting whatever, they want”dont agree with it but it’s their life” but i have a problem with people being selfish and wanting to live both worlds it’s not fair to the child.. it will be confussed as to what is right in the eyes of society and what is wrong. WHAT IS THIS WORLD REALLY COMMING TO ,LORD COME FUH YA WORLD!!!
March 23rd, 2009 at 4:55 pm
OH FUK U U LESBIAN OR GAY I LOVE KIDS U ARE FUKIN CRAZY AND GO AGAINST EVERYTHING GOD MADE U PIGS