Beatle Nut - Heather Mills Goes On About Paul McCartney
WE are not yet divorced from Heather Mills. But there are sings Heather Mills is divorced from reality.
“DAY SHE LOST THE PLOT,” says the Mirror’s front page. “Lady Macca rants on the divorce.. how she still loves Paul.. and on ‘powers out to destroy me’.
Heather is the “BEATLE MANIAC”. The Beatle nut. Heather is on a tour of TV and radio stations.
Sky TV’s Eamonn Holmes, sensitive to the needs of a nation keen to finalise arrangements with Heather, asks when it will all be over. Says Heather: “Do you know what? I’ve got no idea. It’s like getting blood from a stone.”
But not blood from a Beatle. That may constitute a threat.
In another interview, Heather goes on: “It could be a year – I’ve got no idea. It’s not down to me, it’s all down to the hubby.”
Since we are all involved in this protracted divorce, we suggest that the arrangements involves both parties, and if Heather would, for instance, tell Paul she’ll finish it for a million quid, we dare say he’d go for it straight away.
But Heather has moved on. And we are watching - not that she wants us to. “Think about it,” says she to the nation. “When do I ever go on TV, how many times in the last year? I’m not a publicity seeker. I’m chased day in, day out.”
So Heather tells the national media. So Heather tells BBC Radio Five Live: “I will never get over it. I will always love Paul.”
Heather appears on BBC new 24, soon to be renamed Heather Watch. Says she: “There is a huge agenda about trying to destroy me. I don’t have that powerful system he has.” Heather feels that she is under attack.
This is the Star’s “MUCCA’S TELLY RANTFEST”.
This is Heather Mills McCartney telling the world about animal welfare.
But we’ll have to leave it there, Heather - we’ve run out of time…
March 16th, 2007 at 3:34 pm
No doubt, some people will ’soak up’ the animal welfare stance she has, and, is taking - others will only see the publicity she is seeking. Indeed, after reading this article, she will further progress her ’status’ with regard to the “system” that Paul has in his favour.
March 16th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
Probably when Paul wrote his song “When I’m 64″ he was
more than likely just pulling a “number” out of his hat, so to speak.
But, hasn’t his 64th year been a huge downer, thanks to Heather?!
What a HUGE difference it would have been for Paul and his family if
only Linda might have lived. She was truly “Lady McCartney” in every
way! Heather doesn’t deserve this title, in my opinion, in the same
way that she doesn’t deserve a fortune simply by being married for
a short while to Paul. What exactly DOES she deserve??
March 16th, 2007 at 5:51 pm
A spanking - see photos
March 17th, 2007 at 12:30 am
From the beginning Paul McCartney was genuine to Heather Mills.He`s a very romantic man and this is reflected in the romantic songs that he wrote over the years. At his age Paul wanted the company of a special woman who would bring him happiness and love.That`surely wasn`t too much for this great man who brought so much happiness with his tremendous music genius.
Heather Mills, sadly,was never the person to bring Paul true happiness.In my book, her character and values are a real cocktail and very incompatible with Paul.
McCartney`s NOT signing a pre-marriage agreement was a mistake because Mills has been exposed since the break up as a real bitch and money grabber who has shit on Paul in the public arena. In his twenty year happy marriage to Linda he was with a very special woman but Heather Mills in terms of personal credibility hasn`t got a leg to stand on. A very unpopular person. Paul trusted her and she betrayed his trust.
JOHN BLAKE
November 18th, 2007 at 1:25 pm
What Heather did give to Paul was a beautiful face and body. It was sad that she lost her leg, and it might be a reason that she lost Paul. Actually she might have dwelt on it to excess, then causing marital stife. Who really knows, just an idea that I thought of concerning the marriage failure of this famous couple.