
Shannon Matthews: Bratz, Mystic Babies And Sir Norman Bettison
SHANNON WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Shannon Matthews
Shannon Matthews has been in the care of the local authority since she was found. The media had a few hours to speculate and focus on Shannon “what ifs” but now the shutters are down. The man has been charged and will appear in court today.
DAILY MAIL: “Don’t let Shannon go home because her mother’s not ‘ready’, say her grandparents”
You can always interview the family.
“We just don’t want Shannon going back to that house. She can stay with us,” said the nine-year-old’s grandfather Gordon Matthews. “I don’t think that Karen and Craig are ready to look after her properly. While all this has been happening, we had Shannon’s brother and sister staying here with us and they were both so happy - they didn’t want to go back.”
Wonder why? Let’s speculate…
He and his wife June are fearful that Shannon, who is in foster care after her 24- day abduction ordeal, could soon be back at home. Mrs Matthews, 64, added: “I have been thinking of Shannon going back to Karen. It’s just not right. Karen was a great mum before she took Craig in. Since he arrived they’ve had a terrible life.”
Craig Meehan is innocent. Why mention him?
Mr Matthews added: “Craig is like a tiny child. He’s so immature. He rings Karen all the time on the phone, literally 20 times a day.”
Maybe it’s love? Maybe Karen Matthews likes children?
“Karen is like a taxi service for him. She picks him up and drops him off everywhere. I have never liked him and I don’t want Shannon going back to her mother while he is around, you just wouldn’t want him looking after your child.”
DAILY MIRROR: “SHANNON WILL STAY WITH COPS”
Shannon Matthews will not return to her mum and stepdad but will be looked after by specialist carers. Police chief Sir Norman Bettison confirmed that the nine-year-old will not be going home just yet to Karen Matthews, 32, and 22-year-old Craig Meehan for the moment.
Norman Bettison. West Yorkshire’s leading copper. After listening to the grandparents, listening to Norman is the next story. Prepared to update the Wikipedia entry, sir!
Says Sir Norman B-E-T-T-I-S-O-N: “She is safe. She’s well. She’s in the place where we think that she’s safest at the moment.”
He singles out Detectives Paul Kettlewell and Nick Townsend who refused to leave when they got no answer at a flat where neighbours said they could hear a child’s footsteps. They watched the front and back entrances and called for a battering ram. They broke down the door and discovered Shannon.
Says Chief Constable Sir Norman: “I think it is amazing and I think it is a question of pride for me that they started to make inquiries of the neighbours. Given this was the 700th action they had undertaken since the start of the investigation…
“It’s been phenomenal and it’s been unprecedented [“You’ve already used ‘amazing’ sir!] and let me tell you where I’m standing it’s been entirely professional. It’s painstaking methodical work.”
Of his officers: “They’re special people, extraordinary people doing an extraordinary job.”
Wikipedia: Sir Norman Bettison the Amazing, phenomenal, extraordinary, unprecedented…
What of Shannon’s parents?
Karen and Craig had bought a Bratz Chloe doll for her homecoming but sent her a Mystic Babies toy when they realised she would not be back.
The significance of toys cannot be overstated. What can it mean?
THE SUN: “Prezzies and prayers for Shannon”
SHANNON Matthews was bought a doll by her relieved mum yesterday – hours before the man held over the nine-year-old’s kidnap was charged. Two detectives accompanied Karen, 32, and Shannon’s 22-year-old stepdad as they shopped for goodies to give the youngster after her 24-day ordeal.
What do you get Shannon?
Karen and her partner returned to their semi with a Chloe Bratz doll and Mystic Babies toy…Yesterday The Sun chipped in with MORE Bratz toys for her. We delivered a sackful of gifts to her house on behalf of our readers. They included Easter eggs for her brothers Tony, 11, Cameron, five, and sister Courtney, two.
What about the other children? And what make of Easter Egg is it? Sun readers demand to be told how they are being represented…
Grateful Karen said: “Thanks very much for the presents – they are very much appreciated.”
That’s the parents. Any news, you know. Of Sir Norman?
Sir Norman explained: “Talking to a nine-year-old is not a question of sitting them down with a pen and piece of paper. It’s been ten minutes and 15 minutes at a time while we have been building up the information – the evidence that we need in order to take this investigation further.”
Whoah, wing commander. Slow down, sir Norman. Wikipedia doesn’t write itself…
FERGUS SHANAHAN: “Shannon must not be allowed home”
“How can Shannon Matthews go back to the hell she has had to call home? How can she be allowed to live in that mad managerie of fractured relationships, bitter resentments, shouted insults and warring relations?”
Shanahan investigates. And his judgement: “The truth is that we don’t know the truth.”
Such are the facts…
DAILY EXPRESS: “SHANNON POLICE ‘ARE HEROES’”
It’s Sir Norman Bettison – B.E.T.T.I.S.O.N:
Sir Norman said: “The jigsaw pieces came together and gave us what we needed to give Paul and Nick the opportunity to go to an address on Friday morning. Given that this was the 700th action they had undertaken since the start of the investigation, I think it is amazing.
“It is a question of pride for me that they then made inquiries of the neighbours and they heard for the first time about the pitter-patter of the girl’s footsteps in the maisonette above them.”
THE SCOTSMAN: “Police chief praises work of officers in Shannon search”
B-E-T-T-I…
West Yorkshire chief constable Sir Norman Bettison highlighted the work of detectives Paul Kettlewell and Nick Townsend in finding the missing nine-year-old as he defended the professionalism of his force.
THE GUARDIAN: “Man charged with abducting and imprisoning Shannon”
West Yorkshire’s chief constable, Sir Norman Bettison, yesterday described as “fantasists” those critics who claim to have pointed the finger at Donovan early in the huge inquiry, unaware of his detectives’ jigsaw puzzle of clues.
THE TIMES: “Michael Donovan is charged over Shannon Matthews kidnap and false imprisonment”
The chief constable said that the child, who has been under an emergency police protection order and has not yet been reunited with her mother, 32-year-old Karen Matthews, was “in safe and caring hands. Shannon is in the place where she is the safest at the moment. She is away from the flashing lenses and the glare of publicity.”
Police chief? Surely the paper means to say Sir Norman B-E-T-T-I-S-O-N…
DAILY TELEGRAPH: “Michael Donovan charged with kidnapping Shannon Matthews”
Sir Norman said the three-week long investigation involved searching 3,000 houses and interviewing 6,000 people, mostly within a mile radius of Dewsbury Moor, West Yorks. He said officers had received 2,000 calls from the public “with just a hook in there about a weirdo, paedophile, living at X or living at Y”.
THE INDEPENDENT: “Shannon suspect charged with kidnapping
Police have charged Michael Donovan with the kidnap and false imprisonment of nine-year-old Shannon Matthews, who was found on Friday after being missing for 24 days.
Officers had been granted an extra 24 hours to question Mr Donovan, 39, of Lidgate Gardens, Batley Carr, Dewsbury, and announced at 10.15pm last night that he would be charged and would appear at Dewsbury magistrates’ court this morning.
Peter Mann, of the Crown Prosecution Service, said that charges were being brought by officers from West Yorkshire police after they had carefully considered all the material in the case. He warned the media to report the case responsibly. He added: “Michael Donovan stands accused of this offence and has a right to a fair trial.”
HOLD THE FRONT PAGE: “News agency’s Shannon photo exclusive brings massive exposure”
Where there’s missing kids, there’s PR…
Ross Parry Agency, based in Pudsey near Leeds, acquired a photo of Michael Donovan, the suspect arrested after missing schoolgirl Shannon Matthews was found.
When reporters started asking questions, they discovered a family connection that led them to the suspect’s sister Alice Meehan, mother of Shannon’s step-father Craig Meehan. Staff at Ross Parry Agency learned that Alice’s maiden name was Drake – the same as Michael Donovan’s birth name, Paul Drake.
Reporter Liam Miller visited Mrs Meehan Friday night, a few hours after Shannon had been found, and bought the old photograph of Michael Donovan and his young nephew Craig Meehan.
It has since been used carrying the Ross Parry Agency byline on Sky and BBC News, their websites and countless other national news papers and news organisations, bringing the agency unparalleled exposure.
Hurrah!
News editor Sam Yule said: “There was word going round that he (Donovan) was related to the Meehan family. In the run up to Friday we had spoken to a lot of the family and got some phone numbers. We ended up getting hold of Caroline who is Craig’s sister. We met both Alice and Caroline and Alice gave us the photo. It was the only one she could find.”
Sam added: “It was just good journalism, a bit of persistence. We worked very, very hard for that and it was not just one day’s work. We got to the stage where a couple of reporters were working on the story all the time. We got the picture exclusive and everybody has no alternative but to use our picture. We feel proud of ourselves.”
Will Alice and Caroline now get a share of any monies earned form such terrific exposure, or Craig Meehan whose face features in the celebrated picture?
Posted: 18th, March 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (94) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





April 8th, 2008 at 3:00 pm
Why shouldn’t the Maddie fund have helped find another little girl? They’re paying the wages of an ex BBC news reporter out of them. Why shouldn’t it have been spent on finding missing children instead?
March 18th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
92
Denzylle
The other links would be fine I was really interested by the procedure.
March 18th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
Brandon
79
No, plenty of links about the process itself, but I couldn’t find links for a) the McCann 1991 paper, or ii) an Amsterdam connection.
Not being able to find the McCann ref. seems a bit strange as I know I find it in more than one place, which is why I noticed it, but again, I stress, I am NOT suggesting this is a connection to THE McCanns or anything other than a coincidence.
March 18th, 2008 at 11:03 am
84…spam’n…
The memos are Top Banana. Thanks.
March 18th, 2008 at 10:33 am
MM Thread…..of sorts….now up, Ian.
March 18th, 2008 at 10:29 am
Ian… the doors lock automatically. Still, with all the kids locked in the cabins it would mean more space in the lifeboats for the rest of us who left them locked in the attic back home.
March 18th, 2008 at 10:25 am
Can you imagine the “fury” that would erupt in the (unlikely) event that Madeleine is found, and not returned IMMEDIATELY to the fragrant couple?
How “hurtful” and “unhelpful” would that be?
Unfortunately, it ain’t going to happen but it would be very interesting to see what would happen if it did………
March 18th, 2008 at 10:23 am
madeleine thread open
March 18th, 2008 at 10:23 am
new thread
March 18th, 2008 at 10:23 am
82
coolandcalm
I suppose there is always the ‘McCann’ service where you dump the kids in the cabin and piss off out, after informing most of the passengers your ‘child care’ arrangements and sending any pals back to check on them ‘occasionally’.
Oh and dont forget, dont lock that door!
March 18th, 2008 at 10:15 am
Memorandum.
To: Clarence Mitchell, Rothley Bunker.
Clarence, dear boy.
First class effort, these last couple of weeks. I don’t want to get your hopes up too much, dear boy, but there have been murmurs about Whitehall that we may find a niche for your talents, after all. Perhaps you could spin us out of this Afghan contretemps, and other tiresome little matters we seem to have got ourselves into. You could be just the chap we need, so you may not have to rot in Rothley much longer. Haha!
“Brian Kennedy feels that they are a doing a good job in difficult circumstances with passion and commitment and that is important to us. They have also developed a large knowledge base during the six months they have already spent working on the case.”
Usual ten pounds of shit in a five pound bag, eh, Clarence? Splendid! But keep that double-glazing wallah on a short leash, whatever you do.
PM quipped the other day he can’t believe you’re not a Scot. Haha!
Cheeri-bye, and pecker up.
Carruthers.
PS. Hope you’ve managed to sort out that fund of yours, Clarence. Could be a bit awkward, having to explain away a half-million pound deficit. Can’t ask the Bank of England for a bail-out, they’re between a Rock and a hard place. Haha!
March 18th, 2008 at 10:14 am
63…coolandcalm
Thank you for the link.
Will do some sleuthing about that case now.
March 18th, 2008 at 10:13 am
Matt… I think he was found guilty of abduction, kidnapping etc etc but everything else was played down (quite rightly) although the life sentences were a bit of a pointer.
BF… cruise was brilliant, lovely to be waited on hand foot and finger for a change though six meals a day and a 24 hour buffet probably wasn’t such a good thing with hindsight!
Ian… Onboard baby sitting…. you put the children to bed, use the cabin phone to dial a certain number then leave the phone off the hook. You can then dial your cabin from any phone on board to check. Then you can party all night on the fourteen deck ship!
To be fair there are lots of other childcare arrangements. There is a 24 hour creche / nursery / night nursery, they cater from nought months to 17. (One can just imagine a 17 year old agreeing to be in the creche!)
March 18th, 2008 at 10:12 am
68
catkidd Says:
March 18th, 2008 at 9:51 am
ian more than 4 bodies a month for a gp draws suspicion,sure isnt that what got shipman caught
””””””””””””””’
maybe everyones draws must be looked into
March 18th, 2008 at 10:10 am
78
jo
Whenever I try to open links from her site it always comes back with
‘page under construction’
March 18th, 2008 at 10:07 am
Did Denzylle ever find the link about the female eggs merger and Holland?
March 18th, 2008 at 10:07 am
17/03/08
http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/
Maddie’s photos may be fatal
They have become a public liability
I posted it yesterday but no one seemed to be interested at all
March 18th, 2008 at 10:06 am
73 Pat
Probably didn’t think anything. Maybe he isn’t quite all there. At least, that’s the impression the neighbours, etc. give. His brain tumour may have affected him or something like that.
March 18th, 2008 at 10:00 am
74
Matt
I bet she gets a retainer or something from the agency.
March 18th, 2008 at 9:59 am
73 Pat
Doesnt bear thinking about.
March 18th, 2008 at 9:59 am
61…Ian
I bet the Dole Office is attending Orchard House weekly for her to “sign on”.
March 18th, 2008 at 9:55 am
michael donovan- what a twat…how did he ever think he would get away with it, he couldn’t keep her hid forever- so one wonders what his long terms plans were…
March 18th, 2008 at 9:55 am
67
If there were an abductor, then I thought at the time they’d signed her death warrant, stupid idiots.
However, I withdraw the ’stupid idiots’ slur, there is no credible evidence of any abduction occurring. There is plenty of evidence, even in the public domain, that May 3rd was a panto.
March 18th, 2008 at 9:55 am
Morning Brandon
March 18th, 2008 at 9:53 am
59…coolandcalm
I vaguely remember that case…..but not much about the Legal issues
regarding it.
How was the Court Case handled ?
March 18th, 2008 at 9:51 am
Of course this thread isnt a McCann thread, so I apologise for mentioning them - though the Shannon case does seem to be linked as its a possible scam/family connected.
March 18th, 2008 at 9:51 am
ian more than 4 bodies a month for a gp draws suspicion,sure isnt that what got shipman caught
March 18th, 2008 at 9:51 am
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/maddie/article929839.ece
The Holy Negligences are once again vainpoppin’ furious!
Their feeding on other families misery(including MariLuz in their media hysteria) may have contributed to ML fate( God rest her soul).
March 18th, 2008 at 9:50 am
#
11
just_me Says:
March 18th, 2008 at 8:21 am
10 - no she is still married to Gerry as far as we know!
———————————————
I had to change my top!!!
_____________________
Hi Whoops
cool and calm
Hope you had a great cruise , missed you !
Hi everyone
March 18th, 2008 at 9:50 am
C&C - “IF Shannon was abused no-one outside of the family and involved professionals will know about. ”
______________
and thats the way it should be. I’m sure Shannon will not want to be reminded of her ordeal if this were the case. Some people take years and years, and sometimes never speak about sexual abuse. I feel it should be left to Shannon to speak publicly about things when she is older if she feels she wants to, maybe to help others who have been in a similar circumstance. its not for the media to report all kinds of intimate stuff everywhere. I just pray that nothing like this has actually happened to the poor little mite.
March 18th, 2008 at 9:48 am
coolandcalm
Blimey, you foster?
But aren’t you a stalwart supporter of the ‘McCann technique’?