Lady Heather Mills And Fiona’s Paul McCartney Puppet Show
“MACCA’S GAGGING FOR TELLY FORTUNE,” screams the Sun’s front-page headline.
Says Lady Heather Mills, the First Beatle, for it is she: “A person has a right to privacy when they enter a family court and this was taken away from me.”
The Sun notes the words in a statement made by Mills to GMTV, judge and jury for the institutionalised masses and stay-at-home mum on prescription medication: “Publishing this judgment is against the principle of the privacy expected within family courts. This decision appears to have been taken with disregard for my human right to privacy.”
Says the Sun:
“Heather is plotting an all-out assault on the States. Larry King doesn’t pay for interviews, so she’s keeping her powder dry for a big deal with a show like Entertainment Tonight. This time she’ll have Fiona at her side, who isn’t bound by the confidentiality agreement and will give her full opinion about the marriage.”
The plan is, apparently, for Heather to appear on US talk shows and allow her sister Fiona to spill the beans. From being famous for having a spare part, Mills will now be the spare part, with her sister sat on her knee in the manner of Spit the Dog to Mills’ Bob Carolgees.
Better yet, Fiona could sit before her American interlocutor and rub her temples, channelling Heather. To screams of “Dodi, nooooo!” and “She’s gone!” Fiona could cower, contort her hands into a crucifix and scream “Paul is dead!”
Meanwhile, the Sun spots Beatrice Mills-McCartney-Mills-McCartney sat in the back of her dad’s 4×4 “listening to music on a pair of huge head-phones”.
Music. We cock an ear. And we hear the song: “Paul is dead… Paul is dead… Paul is dead…”
Posted: 22nd, March 2008 | In: Celebrities, Tabloids Comment (1) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- yampster on BBC Says It’s Wonderful That Bruce Forsyth Is Too Ill To Host Strictly Come Dancing
- eggman on Madeleine McCann Is Every Parent’s Bogeyman
- eggman on Scotland’s Clinics Ordered Not To Give Swine Flu Vaccine To Over 65s
- eggman on Daily Mail Sticks The Louboutin Into Coleen Rooney
- yampster on Norway Exports More Porn Than It Imports
March 22nd, 2008 at 4:23 pm
What’s Mike McCartney doing these days. He could go along and spill the beans on behalf of Paul.
The following articles from the judgement seem to forbid what she intends to do
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BENNETT
Approved Judgment
McCartney v Mills McCartney
324. During the course of the wife’s evidence Mr Mostyn asked her if she would consent to an order, subject to any leave to report being granted by the judge, prohibiting both the husband and herself and any persons acting on their behalf from publishing, disclosing, or in any way revealing without the consent of the other, the evidence, correspondence, transcripts or judgments in this case, the terms of the financial award and any marital confidences; and if consent was not forthcoming then the party seeking publication should be able to seek the permission of a Family Division Judge.
325. The wife agreed to a consent order being made in those terms.
326. I agree to make such an order. Both parties want it and in the exceptional circumstances of this case it is just and fair to make such an order. I shall also attach a penal notice to this part of my order. But I should warn each of the parties that if either of them personally or through their associates transgresses, then the consequences for committing a contempt of court may be dire. The penal notice will make that clear.