Comments on: Shannon Matthews: The McCanns, A Shameless Scam And Paul Donovan

By: Ann

Ann — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:17:56 +0000

200
paul Says:

April 9th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
scum, this is the the whole reason why i am moving to new zealand to get away from what the uk has turned into
………………………………….
Wait for me !! …my son is over there, he has lived there five years, he had to come back to the UK for a Concerence November before last and was gobsmacked at what a shite-hole this place has turned into and couldn’t wait to get on the plane to get away from here… We have been twice and are planning to go again but I think we will be looking for a job there the way things are going to the dogs here !!

By: Claudette

Claudette — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:20:39 +0000

Karen Matthews - What were you thinking of………

By: paul

paul — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 12:18:07 +0000

scum, this is the the whole reason why i am moving to new zealand to get away from what the uk has turned into

By: Dave Murray

Dave Murray — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:49:08 +0000

Once again the old adage is appropriate: “Money is the root of all evil.” A pity therefore that these awful people were not sufficiently intelligent to realise that police officers would quickly see through their lies and half-witted plans. However, it has brought into sharp focus the fact that those who claim that there are ‘paedophiles and child abductors’ on every street corner are sadly misguided. THe plain fact is that most paedophile activity goes on in the home and classroom by dysfunctional families and dirty teachers. Yet these are the very people who are constantly bleating about ‘child protection issues.’

By: âde

âde — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:32:07 +0000

see yas later
have fun watching them suffer

By: âde

âde — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:30:59 +0000

have to go out soon and was plucking yesterday - sadly missed the fun.

i love this pj proposal of a reconstruction on pdl.

of course to a family who want to co-operate and concentrate on finding their missing child this is a very sensible and welcome idea.

to some odiates who just want to clear their name - this is not a good idea, of course

pj have them in a win-win situation
if they agree their lies will be exposed
if they do not agree it is clear the do not want to co-operate and have a big secret to hide.

it’s fun fun fun
and squirm squirm squirm
:smiley for arrogant lowlife squirming:
such enjoyable sport

By: âde

âde — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:20:01 +0000

mornin’ all

so it looks like groups of family and friends can come up with money-making scams involving alleged abduction of children and fake tv interviews.
but we knew that in may last year of course
brilliant fun and much suffering to come yet
excellent sport
i’m really enjoying this

By: PeterMac

PeterMac — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:58:15 +0000

Charged with Child neglect.
Come on Clarrie. Spin that one !

By: lyn

lyn — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:45:48 +0000

Things don’t look good for Karen Matthews do they. Yet, her friend says she, Karen, was in a state when Shannon first went missing. The friend even helped Karen search. Wonder If the mother was put up to it, then had second thoughts.

By: doorstop

doorstop — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 00:55:33 +0000

Where the goddam to hell is everyone. All running scared. I think not. More like a thread upon a thread but there has been too many threads. Dare, I say it… stand and be counted, I think not….. many apologies for the bad translation(s)

Mrs A Connery

By: brandon flours

brandon flours — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:19:32 +0000

It will be interesting to find out the neglect details!

By: Dr. Watson

Dr. Watson — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:55:59 +0000

Hurray!

What Mitchell claims minus spin indicates that police require them to return to Portugal!!!! In my honest opinion only of course!

By: PeterMac

PeterMac — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:37:55 +0000

…. and CHILD NEGLECT.
That is the important one

By: digitalblonde

digitalblonde — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:16:54 +0000

The revelation that Shannon may not have been kidnapped at all casts some doubt on other cases… if her mother, boyfriend and his family could act so very well for the cameras, who is to say others can’t?

Just a thought.

Oh, and the reconstruction? Just a way to view their reactions reliving the night she went missing. See how good their acting abilities are. I guess. But who am I to read the PJ’s mind?

By: SC46

SC46 — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:54:35 +0000

BBC News website:

(snippet) “The mother of Shannon Matthews has been charged in connection with the nine-year-old’s disappearance.

Karen Matthews, 32, of Moorside Road, Dewsbury Moor, faces charges of child neglect and perverting the course of justice.

Shannon vanished on 19 February and was found 24 days later after one of the largest missing person hunt’s West Yorkshire Police had ever conducted. “

By: AgendaWide

AgendaWide — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:51:32 +0000

Clearance M interviewed just now on PM Radio 4. He sounded very dubious and suspicious about PJ request for a reconstruction in PDL. Team MCann were wondering about the value of this, UNLESS it was televised for a mass audience, aiming to jog memories. He could not rule it out but did not think it likely to happen for anniversary (That would be macarbe if televised and the sort of thing you expect Team MCCann to come up with not PJ). But PJ probbably do not intend beaming it out to millions of viewers but instead check timelines and testimonies and watch reactions. IMO whatever way it would be played it would be very heavy emotionally.
Clearance was also asked about Shannon Matthews family members begging for money. C would not touch request for money with a ‘bargepole’ and was suspicious of illiterate emails and agressive visit from one person. But he came across as mean by not willing to support the Find-Shannon missing campaign.
Perhaps all this has been heard today but one interesting news item was the Clearance has released this information to the police in the last 48 hours? why not before? How right Anorak were to link these cases.

By: Chrissy

Chrissy — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:42:36 +0000

I’m sure this won’t apply to anyone here (?) but I’ve seen plenty of comments about how the ‘genuine’ grief on Karen Matthews face showed up the ‘obvious fakery’ elsewhere. So I’m wondering just where this latest news leaves such posters!
Chrissy (who thinks maybe she should stay on the fence a while yet)

By: brandon flours

brandon flours — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:36:26 +0000

SC46
357
SC46 Says:

April 8th, 2008 at 2:52 pm
Nosey - always good to squeeze in anothjer couple…
————————————————————————–
359
brandon flours Says:

April 8th, 2008 at 2:53 pm
sc46

Do you swing?

By: Inspector Gadget

Inspector Gadget — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:20:15 +0000

Seven children by five men…..oh my, Pitty’s head is spinning……one woman, one mate - that’s the way it is done…..wolves mate for life but then again life expectancy is very very short in the wilds……..

Shameless Scam - well even the worst of the worst wants a piece of the action, and Pitty says why not, one shameless scam artist robbing another - works for Pitty!

By: brandon flours

brandon flours — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:53:42 +0000

Carmen

Sorry I was thinking out loud again I was trying to find a silver lining