<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: No Portugal Return, Maddy TV And Paris Hilton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: RREGGIE</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-321067</link>
		<dc:creator>RREGGIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-321067</guid>
		<description>Such a horrible event. Will Maddie ever be found? We pray for each day... me, he wife and our children. What is happening to this world? 

Please Jesus, come soon. We are in a terrible state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a horrible event. Will Maddie ever be found? We pray for each day&#8230; me, he wife and our children. What is happening to this world? </p>
<p>Please Jesus, come soon. We are in a terrible state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320904</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320904</guid>
		<description>496 PeterMac Says:

" That is one view.
It is not one I share."

OK, you may be different, but the uneasy feeling of not knowing what happened to a missing relative - as opposed to a deceased relative - is described by many persons who suffer(ed) this situation. Insofar it is not a matter of opinion, but a well described psychological fact.

" If KM actually thought that MM was alive and in the hands of someone, she would not be able to function at the happy smiling laughing level we have unfortunately so often been treated to. "

As if people in troubled situations would not be able to smile or laugh at all. (Indeed if they are not able, then it's called "depressive" and seen as a mental illness.) Also, the ability to function to a considerable degree in traumatic circumstances is an indicator of strength, and not of guilt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>496 PeterMac Says:</p>
<p>&#8221; That is one view.<br />
It is not one I share.&#8221;</p>
<p>OK, you may be different, but the uneasy feeling of not knowing what happened to a missing relative - as opposed to a deceased relative - is described by many persons who suffer(ed) this situation. Insofar it is not a matter of opinion, but a well described psychological fact.</p>
<p>&#8221; If KM actually thought that MM was alive and in the hands of someone, she would not be able to function at the happy smiling laughing level we have unfortunately so often been treated to. &#8221;</p>
<p>As if people in troubled situations would not be able to smile or laugh at all. (Indeed if they are not able, then it&#8217;s called &#8220;depressive&#8221; and seen as a mental illness.) Also, the ability to function to a considerable degree in traumatic circumstances is an indicator of strength, and not of guilt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320899</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320899</guid>
		<description>496
PeterMac Says: 

May 29th, 2008 at 8:33 am 
494 Ferdinand
That is one view.
It is not one I share. And from the almost total lack of action on the part of the McCs from the first minutes of the reported incident, I suspect it is not one they share either.
If KM actually thought that MM was alive and in the hands of someone, she would not be able to function at the happy smiling laughing level we have unfortunately so often been treated to.
----------------------------------------------

...as in being elegantly coiffered, going jogging within days, after having first put the remaining children in the Creche, etc etc, not the actions of a distraught parent of a missing-withiout-trace child IMHO of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>496<br />
PeterMac Says: </p>
<p>May 29th, 2008 at 8:33 am<br />
494 Ferdinand<br />
That is one view.<br />
It is not one I share. And from the almost total lack of action on the part of the McCs from the first minutes of the reported incident, I suspect it is not one they share either.<br />
If KM actually thought that MM was alive and in the hands of someone, she would not be able to function at the happy smiling laughing level we have unfortunately so often been treated to.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>&#8230;as in being elegantly coiffered, going jogging within days, after having first put the remaining children in the Creche, etc etc, not the actions of a distraught parent of a missing-withiout-trace child IMHO of course</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irish girl spain</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320898</link>
		<dc:creator>irish girl spain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320898</guid>
		<description>492 - Peter Mac
=====
You know, you're dead right there!
There IS definitely something that is frightening her.
Do you think G is controlling her? 
He appears to take the lead role, and i notice a lot of hand-holding (nothing wrong with that i say),,, but is it some sort of signals he's giving her i wonder.
I lost my girl in a road accident years ago, i love to talk about her and to mention her name - gave up crying after the funeral. I even forgave the lad that ran her over. I'm not comparing the Mcc's to myself - its a different scenario.
Everyone had different ways of handling grief.
This is the most extraordinary case - have you ever come across another like it??
If they are completely innocent and have nothing to hide, (as they keep telling us)...why have they got the british government helping them, not to mention extradition lawyers Michael Caplan QC and Angus McBride, multi-millionaire financial backing, CM who gave up his  role as director of the media monitoring unit at the government's Central Office of Information to help the "innocent victims of a heinous crime", ie, the Mcc's......
I agree, something else is making her (them) very frightened imo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>492 - Peter Mac<br />
=====<br />
You know, you&#8217;re dead right there!<br />
There IS definitely something that is frightening her.<br />
Do you think G is controlling her?<br />
He appears to take the lead role, and i notice a lot of hand-holding (nothing wrong with that i say),,, but is it some sort of signals he&#8217;s giving her i wonder.<br />
I lost my girl in a road accident years ago, i love to talk about her and to mention her name - gave up crying after the funeral. I even forgave the lad that ran her over. I&#8217;m not comparing the Mcc&#8217;s to myself - its a different scenario.<br />
Everyone had different ways of handling grief.<br />
This is the most extraordinary case - have you ever come across another like it??<br />
If they are completely innocent and have nothing to hide, (as they keep telling us)&#8230;why have they got the british government helping them, not to mention extradition lawyers Michael Caplan QC and Angus McBride, multi-millionaire financial backing, CM who gave up his  role as director of the media monitoring unit at the government&#8217;s Central Office of Information to help the &#8220;innocent victims of a heinous crime&#8221;, ie, the Mcc&#8217;s&#8230;&#8230;<br />
I agree, something else is making her (them) very frightened imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterMac</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320892</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320892</guid>
		<description>494 Ferdinand
That is one view.
It is not one I share.  And from the almost total lack of action on the part of the McCs from the first minutes of the reported incident, I suspect it is not one they share either.
If KM actually thought that MM was alive and in the hands of someone, she would not be able to function at the happy smiling laughing level we have unfortunately so often been treated to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>494 Ferdinand<br />
That is one view.<br />
It is not one I share.  And from the almost total lack of action on the part of the McCs from the first minutes of the reported incident, I suspect it is not one they share either.<br />
If KM actually thought that MM was alive and in the hands of someone, she would not be able to function at the happy smiling laughing level we have unfortunately so often been treated to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matty</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320891</link>
		<dc:creator>matty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320891</guid>
		<description>Mornin  :)

New thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mornin  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>New thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferdinand</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320889</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferdinand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320889</guid>
		<description>492 PeterMac Says:

" Yes, and it is in my view more than simply being upset. A year on, and people can normally talk about a deceased relative without choking "

But this is not about a deceased person. It's an ongoing thing. You can't "move on" while you think your daughter is in the hands of somebody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>492 PeterMac Says:</p>
<p>&#8221; Yes, and it is in my view more than simply being upset. A year on, and people can normally talk about a deceased relative without choking &#8221;</p>
<p>But this is not about a deceased person. It&#8217;s an ongoing thing. You can&#8217;t &#8220;move on&#8221; while you think your daughter is in the hands of somebody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320885</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320885</guid>
		<description>490
PeterMac Says: 

May 29th, 2008 at 8:01 am 
489 Ann
As we used to say to suspects before interview. “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember what you’ve said”.
================================================

Absolutely...because the truth is what it is and not something invented, and the longer this farce goes on, the harder it must be for them to remember what they said. Also - if I had to listen to Kate's mumblings and verbal stumblings  for too long, I think I'd change my Doctor !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>490<br />
PeterMac Says: </p>
<p>May 29th, 2008 at 8:01 am<br />
489 Ann<br />
As we used to say to suspects before interview. “If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember what you’ve said”.<br />
================================================</p>
<p>Absolutely&#8230;because the truth is what it is and not something invented, and the longer this farce goes on, the harder it must be for them to remember what they said. Also - if I had to listen to Kate&#8217;s mumblings and verbal stumblings  for too long, I think I&#8217;d change my Doctor !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterMac</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320884</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320884</guid>
		<description>491 irish girl spain
"K certainly gets very twitchy and nervy when she mentions M’s name"
Yes, and it is in my view more than simply being upset.  A year on, and people can normally talk about a deceased relative without choking, even though they still find it upsetting.   But it does not totally trash their speech patterns.
Even if it is a function of being on the edge of tears, the language that people speak 'though the tears' is still coherent and more or less well ordered.
My diagnosis, as a complete amateur, with a degree in psychology and 30 years as a cop, 7 as a detective, is that something else is making her very frightened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>491 irish girl spain<br />
&#8220;K certainly gets very twitchy and nervy when she mentions M’s name&#8221;<br />
Yes, and it is in my view more than simply being upset.  A year on, and people can normally talk about a deceased relative without choking, even though they still find it upsetting.   But it does not totally trash their speech patterns.<br />
Even if it is a function of being on the edge of tears, the language that people speak &#8216;though the tears&#8217; is still coherent and more or less well ordered.<br />
My diagnosis, as a complete amateur, with a degree in psychology and 30 years as a cop, 7 as a detective, is that something else is making her very frightened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irish girl spain</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320883</link>
		<dc:creator>irish girl spain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320883</guid>
		<description>488
Peter Mac
“You’ve er, like, got a, y’know, thing that you’ve, er, got to try to, y’know whoosh, clunk, so y’know take, er, some of these things every, erm, y’know and …and… you should be better in a week”
=====
:lol:
the girl in the farmacia here must have gone to med school with K - i got hayfever tablets and she told me to take  1 ermm today, and ermmm yesterday take 2  :shock:  
   K certainly gets very twitchy and nervy when she mentions M's name.imo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>488<br />
Peter Mac<br />
“You’ve er, like, got a, y’know, thing that you’ve, er, got to try to, y’know whoosh, clunk, so y’know take, er, some of these things every, erm, y’know and …and… you should be better in a week”<br />
=====<br />
 <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
the girl in the farmacia here must have gone to med school with K - i got hayfever tablets and she told me to take  1 ermm today, and ermmm yesterday take 2  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
   K certainly gets very twitchy and nervy when she mentions M&#8217;s name.imo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterMac</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320882</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 07:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320882</guid>
		<description>489 Ann
As we used to say to suspects before interview.  "If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember what you've said".

And all that stuff about being stressed because of the media attention.  Also total rot.  Doctors are used to speaking in public, they do it to groups of students, to nurses, to seminars, to meetings.  It is part of their profession.  Some are better than others, but they all have some training and practice .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>489 Ann<br />
As we used to say to suspects before interview.  &#8220;If you tell the truth, you don&#8217;t have to remember what you&#8217;ve said&#8221;.</p>
<p>And all that stuff about being stressed because of the media attention.  Also total rot.  Doctors are used to speaking in public, they do it to groups of students, to nurses, to seminars, to meetings.  It is part of their profession.  Some are better than others, but they all have some training and practice .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320881</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320881</guid>
		<description>488
PeterMac Says: 

May 29th, 2008 at 7:48 am 

Agree wholeheartedly, stress and trying to remember withiout a written script, all that has gone before !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>488<br />
PeterMac Says: </p>
<p>May 29th, 2008 at 7:48 am </p>
<p>Agree wholeheartedly, stress and trying to remember withiout a written script, all that has gone before !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterMac</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320878</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320878</guid>
		<description>475 annie1 
" - then I do feel that some of the phrases used and the hesitant staccato of Kates voice is due a lot to her colloquial accent. To a certain extent this also applies to Gerry"

But, I repeat, these are intelligent educated people, in a profession where accuracy and precision is paramount.  It is inconceivable that KM would speak that way in a consultation .

"You've er, like, got a, y'know, thing that you've, er, got to try to, y'know whoosh, clunk, so y'know take, er, some of these things every, erm, y'know and ...and...  you should be better in a week"

For this reason I have formed the strong opinion that her speech patterns when talking about MM are caused purely by stress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>475 annie1<br />
&#8221; - then I do feel that some of the phrases used and the hesitant staccato of Kates voice is due a lot to her colloquial accent. To a certain extent this also applies to Gerry&#8221;</p>
<p>But, I repeat, these are intelligent educated people, in a profession where accuracy and precision is paramount.  It is inconceivable that KM would speak that way in a consultation .</p>
<p>&#8220;You&#8217;ve er, like, got a, y&#8217;know, thing that you&#8217;ve, er, got to try to, y&#8217;know whoosh, clunk, so y&#8217;know take, er, some of these things every, erm, y&#8217;know and &#8230;and&#8230;  you should be better in a week&#8221;</p>
<p>For this reason I have formed the strong opinion that her speech patterns when talking about MM are caused purely by stress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missis_USA</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320877</link>
		<dc:creator>Missis_USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320877</guid>
		<description>IMHO the police have already read the text messages and know the person Gerry apparently texted. I personally believe they might have just needed it to be approved to take it as evidence in court, but most likely got thrown out since it would be illegal and could be used as defence. Just a theory..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO the police have already read the text messages and know the person Gerry apparently texted. I personally believe they might have just needed it to be approved to take it as evidence in court, but most likely got thrown out since it would be illegal and could be used as defence. Just a theory..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320876</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320876</guid>
		<description>THE parents of missing Madeleine McCann might be charged with neglect, it was officially confirmed last night. 

Court papers revealed Portuguese investigators were considering the "abandonment" charge. 

But they were also looking at abduction, homicide and concealment of a corpse, the documents showed. 

The McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell said it did not mean they WOULD be charged. 

And he said the couple were pleased that detectives were considering abduction as a theory. 

Gerry and Kate McCann, both doctors from Rothley, Leics, deny any involvement in Maddie’s disappearance. 

She vanished aged three from a holiday flat in Praia da Luz, Portugal, last May as they dined with friends. 

The couple could be jailed for ten years if charged and convicted. 

The papers also reveal prosecutors wanted to see text messages between the McCanns and their friends — but the Supreme Court turned down the request. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This from the "Sun".............</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE parents of missing Madeleine McCann might be charged with neglect, it was officially confirmed last night. </p>
<p>Court papers revealed Portuguese investigators were considering the &#8220;abandonment&#8221; charge. </p>
<p>But they were also looking at abduction, homicide and concealment of a corpse, the documents showed. </p>
<p>The McCanns’ spokesman Clarence Mitchell said it did not mean they WOULD be charged. </p>
<p>And he said the couple were pleased that detectives were considering abduction as a theory. </p>
<p>Gerry and Kate McCann, both doctors from Rothley, Leics, deny any involvement in Maddie’s disappearance. </p>
<p>She vanished aged three from a holiday flat in Praia da Luz, Portugal, last May as they dined with friends. </p>
<p>The couple could be jailed for ten years if charged and convicted. </p>
<p>The papers also reveal prosecutors wanted to see text messages between the McCanns and their friends — but the Supreme Court turned down the request.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>This from the &#8220;Sun&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AgendaWide</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320875</link>
		<dc:creator>AgendaWide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320875</guid>
		<description>482 irish girl spain 
Interesting out the choice of crimes being considered. 
'The first published court ruling on the Madeleine case confirms that the police inquiry covers homicide, abandonment, concealment of a corpse and abduction.'

Times picks neglect, Telegraph picks negligence, Sky well Sky complains it took so long for the appeal to rules ,Correio da Manhã picks homicide and guess what Clearance picks - yes abduction of course :) 
But at least Sky says
'The court document refers to one telephone that has not been identified, which sent Gerry McCann 14 texts the day before Madeleine's disappearance and four the day after.'
I never knew what the basis for the Tapas 10 was before but now I know or at least I would know if the appeal had succeeded. No stone unturned :roll:
Must go now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>482 irish girl spain<br />
Interesting out the choice of crimes being considered.<br />
&#8216;The first published court ruling on the Madeleine case confirms that the police inquiry covers homicide, abandonment, concealment of a corpse and abduction.&#8217;</p>
<p>Times picks neglect, Telegraph picks negligence, Sky well Sky complains it took so long for the appeal to rules ,Correio da Manhã picks homicide and guess what Clearance picks - yes abduction of course <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
But at least Sky says<br />
&#8216;The court document refers to one telephone that has not been identified, which sent Gerry McCann 14 texts the day before Madeleine&#8217;s disappearance and four the day after.&#8217;<br />
I never knew what the basis for the Tapas 10 was before but now I know or at least I would know if the appeal had succeeded. No stone unturned <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Must go now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320874</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320874</guid>
		<description>467
val Says: 

May 29th, 2008 at 12:36 am 
465 jo

I saw a photo of Gerry today at his front door receiving two Top Lawyers who
charge about £6-700 per hour. The photo was taken just after they returned from
Portugal………you wouldn”t believe the number of different Lawyers they have sought
advice from and since they can”t use the Fund for Legal fees, what are they going to
do when the Legal Fund runs out!!!!!! It was started with the £100,000 Richard
Branson contributed, maybe another couple of donors, I don”t know. Must be nearly
depleted by now.
===========================================

Not only depleted but hardly likely to be topped up by "concerned " donors now I wouldn't imagine, and I should think Branson et al, are feeling decidedly sheepish by now, but - having said that - it would have been a tax relief for them anyway so I don't suppose it matters that much to them.

Also - if none of the Dippy Seven or the McCanns, are going to go back to Portugal to help themselves, then no-one else is going to feel the urge to continue helping them, and I did see briefly on the news that the Portuguese Police were considering charging the McCanns with neglect or something, must keep watching and see more on that but it could also explain just why they won't dare go back !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>467<br />
val Says: </p>
<p>May 29th, 2008 at 12:36 am<br />
465 jo</p>
<p>I saw a photo of Gerry today at his front door receiving two Top Lawyers who<br />
charge about £6-700 per hour. The photo was taken just after they returned from<br />
Portugal………you wouldn”t believe the number of different Lawyers they have sought<br />
advice from and since they can”t use the Fund for Legal fees, what are they going to<br />
do when the Legal Fund runs out!!!!!! It was started with the £100,000 Richard<br />
Branson contributed, maybe another couple of donors, I don”t know. Must be nearly<br />
depleted by now.<br />
===========================================</p>
<p>Not only depleted but hardly likely to be topped up by &#8220;concerned &#8221; donors now I wouldn&#8217;t imagine, and I should think Branson et al, are feeling decidedly sheepish by now, but - having said that - it would have been a tax relief for them anyway so I don&#8217;t suppose it matters that much to them.</p>
<p>Also - if none of the Dippy Seven or the McCanns, are going to go back to Portugal to help themselves, then no-one else is going to feel the urge to continue helping them, and I did see briefly on the news that the Portuguese Police were considering charging the McCanns with neglect or something, must keep watching and see more on that but it could also explain just why they won&#8217;t dare go back !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AgendaWide</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320872</link>
		<dc:creator>AgendaWide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320872</guid>
		<description>Morning all
Matt
Well the Times revelations from the nonevent of the court ruling on the failed appeal 
to permit access to the content of the mobile phone evidence is most interesting :)

It mentions Tapas 10 mobile telephones belong to T9 group??? why would the Tapas 9 have an extra mobile phone? Also the transcript mentions rather a lot of unidentifed phone messages TO G when he was having a normal holiday on the 2May.
‘Telephone number as yet unidentified which during May 2 2007 sent 14 written SMS messages to G.M. and another 4 on the day following M.M.’s disappearance’.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Morning all<br />
Matt<br />
Well the Times revelations from the nonevent of the court ruling on the failed appeal<br />
to permit access to the content of the mobile phone evidence is most interesting <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It mentions Tapas 10 mobile telephones belong to T9 group??? why would the Tapas 9 have an extra mobile phone? Also the transcript mentions rather a lot of unidentifed phone messages TO G when he was having a normal holiday on the 2May.<br />
‘Telephone number as yet unidentified which during May 2 2007 sent 14 written SMS messages to G.M. and another 4 on the day following M.M.’s disappearance’.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irish girl spain</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320870</link>
		<dc:creator>irish girl spain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 06:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320870</guid>
		<description>Good morning :-)
From The TimesMay 29, 2008

Madeleine McCann's parents investigated for neglect
""Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for the McCanns, said: “We are pleased to see that the investigation covers abduction. Kate and Gerry have had legal advice in both Portugal and Britain which say that everything they did was within the boundaries of reasonable behaviour.” ""
......."pleased"?.....    :shock:
So that's ok then Clarrie? 
""""The reference to “abandonment” suggests that Portuguese detectives are investigating if there is evidence that Kate and Gerry McCann were negligent in leaving their daughter alone on the night she was reported missing. The charge carries a maximum 10-year jail sentence."""" 
excellent news :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
From The TimesMay 29, 2008</p>
<p>Madeleine McCann&#8217;s parents investigated for neglect<br />
&#8220;&#8221;Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for the McCanns, said: “We are pleased to see that the investigation covers abduction. Kate and Gerry have had legal advice in both Portugal and Britain which say that everything they did was within the boundaries of reasonable behaviour.” &#8220;&#8221;<br />
&#8230;&#8230;.&#8221;pleased&#8221;?&#8230;..    <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
So that&#8217;s ok then Clarrie?<br />
&#8220;&#8221;"&#8221;The reference to “abandonment” suggests that Portuguese detectives are investigating if there is evidence that Kate and Gerry McCann were negligent in leaving their daughter alone on the night she was reported missing. The charge carries a maximum 10-year jail sentence.&#8221;"&#8221;"<br />
excellent news <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320868</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 05:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/184337.html#comment-320868</guid>
		<description>329
chenier Says:
May 28th, 2008 at 6:04 pm

327
Cheryl Says: 

Sorry for the lateness, Chenier, have been out rest of the day and evening on family matters.  I picked up on the McCanns not wanting to return from what I read on here from what some of the posters were writing.  Now, could I be misinterpreting what some were saying - possibly.  But that is the interpretations I got from some I read before I had to leave.  And there have been posters over the past week saying they wouldn't go over.  However, Chenier, that doesn't change my mind about my feelings I wouldn't return over there after the research I've done. I have the highest respect for the new investigator and have from the moment he took over.  But the bad taste that Amaral and his men left me with with their &lt;em&gt;supposed&lt;/em&gt; lack of proper police procedures, etc. I wouldn't return.   To be honest I don't think for a second the Investigator is playing games at all or setting them up or whatever to get them over there.  My feelings have been he was trying to tie up loose ends by his trip to the UK and then asking them all to come over there before he makes a decision on what to do re this case.  Yet I don't know what legal rights the McCanns would have or protection once they returned to a foreign country and would be at their mercy.

_____
edited in italics
-meercat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>329<br />
chenier Says:<br />
May 28th, 2008 at 6:04 pm</p>
<p>327<br />
Cheryl Says: </p>
<p>Sorry for the lateness, Chenier, have been out rest of the day and evening on family matters.  I picked up on the McCanns not wanting to return from what I read on here from what some of the posters were writing.  Now, could I be misinterpreting what some were saying - possibly.  But that is the interpretations I got from some I read before I had to leave.  And there have been posters over the past week saying they wouldn&#8217;t go over.  However, Chenier, that doesn&#8217;t change my mind about my feelings I wouldn&#8217;t return over there after the research I&#8217;ve done. I have the highest respect for the new investigator and have from the moment he took over.  But the bad taste that Amaral and his men left me with with their <em>supposed</em> lack of proper police procedures, etc. I wouldn&#8217;t return.   To be honest I don&#8217;t think for a second the Investigator is playing games at all or setting them up or whatever to get them over there.  My feelings have been he was trying to tie up loose ends by his trip to the UK and then asking them all to come over there before he makes a decision on what to do re this case.  Yet I don&#8217;t know what legal rights the McCanns would have or protection once they returned to a foreign country and would be at their mercy.</p>
<p>_____<br />
edited in italics<br />
-meercat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
