Big Brother Slapdancer Alexandra De Gale’s No Touching Rule
BIG Brother 9 Watch: Anorak’s looks at Big Brother news in the media…
MORE news on Alexandra de Gale, who now functions as the Star and Mirror’s Big Brother standard bearer.
“BIG BRO ALEX FACES BOOT,” announces the Star. “Fans fury over rows.”
The show’s “producers are shocked by the ex-lapdancer’s angry rants and the hundreds of viewer complaints”.
Shocked? We thought ythsi is how she is expected to behave? What is it about lapdancers that makes them so argumentative? And how long until they’re called slapadancers, offering punters a happy slap and some verbal abuse?
“I’d appreciate it if no-one touches my things,” says Alexnadra, taking the no touching rule beyond the lap and the pole. She asks: “Why do people think they can violate my property?”
Last season’s Big Brother featured Charley Uchea, who had also danced for money. When the music stopped, Charley set about calling everyone “pafetick” and strafing them with her ack-ack fire speech patterns.
The one thing about Charley was that we could understand only one in every thirty words she spoke. She might have been talking to herself, and we did out best to look away and ignore here.
A free £10 Big Brother FREE BET for all Anorak readers…
But Alexandra is the lapdancer performing to a slower song. Her words are enunciated, chiefly the word “f*ck”, which is her motto.
Now the Star says “gobby” Alexandra De Gale is on a final warning and might yet rusticated.
And know that in an “exclusive poll for the Daily Star, 100% of people backed the campaign to get the ‘wicked witch of the south’ axed.”
It might only be that two peoples voted, but 100% cannot be argued with, and Alexandra joins Saddam Hussein in achieving the perfect democratic score.
Get Alexandra out – or keep her in and give the papers something to talk about…
June 13th, 2008 at 8:51 am
ah, but that’s the key, isn’t it - they’ll keep her in, despite her rantings and bullying because it improves the viewing figures - just like they did with Jade Goody and cronies and the afore-mentioned Charley…
cynical exploitation…..
June 13th, 2008 at 11:24 am
Dairy
I think it would be an interesting experiment to pull the Big Brother show but leave the housemates in believing that they are being watched 24/7.
They could then do the evictions and see the reactions from the fame crazy contestants when they realise that nobody has watched and nobody knows who the heck they are.
June 13th, 2008 at 11:49 am
beats me why anyone in their right mind would go on a programme like that anyway - the “housemates” (and I use the term loosely) are universally panned and made to look like idiots (although many are perfectly capable of doing that all by themselves) - to what end? 15mins of fame on the outside, maybe a couple of supermarket openings and then derision for the rest of their lives….?
June 13th, 2008 at 11:50 am
…but you make an interesting point, Noseycow - it IS an experiment in human behaviour and therefore the question is - who is worse? the fame-hungry fool who goes in or the bear-baiting public watching….?
June 13th, 2008 at 11:54 am
Dairy
on the odd occasion that I watch it, it feeds my superiority complex nicely
June 16th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Is Luke “Derek Faye”? (Catherine Tate)