http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/185485.html#comment-339308

You’ll find them hanging out at

http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/185485.html#comment-339306

Please leave link to new thread if available !

Will you have to delete all previous threads too?

M and A (June)

Probably close them, but if it happens it will be from todays date.
personally I don’t it happening, the McC have used the media to serve their ends, and it was they who put Madeleine in the media. I think whoever is deciding this (if its being decided) will bear that in mind

Take a leaf out of the Saintly Ones’ book.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZGMHShn0ZE

******************
Well said Pollyanna!

the weather’s horrible anyway.

Wait til tomorrow when I predict the sun will shine, and the british press will have the courts authority to print the news

Bang goes my trip to Wales today then.

F*CK !!!!!

Which means that no doubt there will be a press announcement on the steps of the High Court. Things could happen very fast, so keep your eyes peeled.

Do you think the amount of foreign interest in this case will have a bearing on the judgement, if this is what today is about (which I suspect you are right - sounds like a Team McC stunt to me).

Will the judge take into consideration the fact that they can not prevent foreign newspapers from publishing stories about them?

If they are granted their wishes then would all the old threads on anorak have to be removed?

http://tinyurl.com/5ng4lt

what a plonker as delboy would say
great fun

Yes, I am serious.

I am digging into this as fast as I can, but you would all be well advised to remember that you are individually, along with Anorak, liable for your postings on here.

If this is a contra mundum order which is being applied for - then it would be contempt of court to say anything prohibited by the court, not just a matter of libel or defamation. A very serious offence.

We will be keeping an eye on the situation - and if you are advised to say nothing - then say nothing! Contempt of court is the fastest route known to mankind to incarceration at HM pleasure.

The danger on Anorak will be that of course the UK courts cannot gag the foreign press, so there will still be material available on the net which is outside the remit of the UK court. If that material is cut and pasted onto Anorak, then it will be within the remit of the HIgh Court. Whatever the merits of the McCann case, the High Court will take any contempt of court very, very, seriously.

You (and Anorak) are not, repeat not, outside the remit of the UK court.

you’re not serious???

So just as we might start to get some information - the McC’s might (sucessfully) try and stop it being published.

How would that happen re: foreign news outlets? and would we be able to comment on it on anorak?

THE mum of missing Madeleine McCann has made a tearful call to a holidaymaker who reported a man acting suspiciously before her daughter disappeared.
Paul Gordon, 32, said a “creepy” man asked him for cash when he was staying in Praia da Luz, Portugal, last year.

The man approached him when he was renting the flat from where Madeleine, then three, was snatched the next week.

Kate McCann, 40, begged him to give his evidence to the Spanish private investigators probing the case for her.

But the brewery manager, of Fareham, Hants, said no as he had already spoken to police.

Portuguese cops have refused to release Mr Gordon’s e-fit of the man, saying it may prejudice a future court case.

Meanwhile lawyers for Kate and husband Gerry, 39, of Rothley, Leics, will try to force British cops to release their information on Maddie at London’s High Court today.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/maddie/article1387843.ece

*************************

“But the brewery manager, of Fareham, Hants, said no as he had already spoken to police”.

Just as well this did all happen in Portugal - this would be interfering with a potential crown witness in the UK.

I you are tripping the light fantastic down the road this morning, you might want to pull up this case first….Scott QC is listed leading for McCann today.

Abdullah Masry v Mona Al Khatib, High Court Family Division, Sumner J (led by Timothy Scott QC) – successful application for an injunction restraining the press generally from publishing stories about the parties and their children (contra mundum order) – application of the court’s jurisdiction in wardship;

I suspect that Duncan may make use of that last comment…

+++++++++++++++++++

Already noted!

It will be a crucial part of my defence

I am fading fast, too.
Hope you are well!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Karen

duncanr