<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Madeleine McCann: Suing Amaral, Mark Lawson&#8217;s Fact And Fiction, And Bloggers Beware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html</link>
	<description>Tabloid news for broadsheet readers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete McKey</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-364503</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete McKey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-364503</guid>
		<description>funny thing to me is that...

is there anyone out there who truly believes Maddie's alive?

nothing on Mr Amaral's book is made up. It's all in the case files.

the guilty party - whoever that is - will never sue him as they know that is what he wants them to do, so that under the Portuguese law, the original case can be re-opened and that is something they simply don't want to happen

Re-opening the process is out of the question. It's a funny thing no UK publisher is willing to take the chance of publishing and distributing the English translation of the book. Who are they afraid of?...

There are far bigger fish in the sea, you know? the US would not mind getting it exposed. The truth, no mater how hard you try will ALWAYS prevail.

Think about it... do you believe the McCann's for themselves or 'cause you refuse to believe this whole circus grew way beyond anyones expectations? Do you truly believe the poor girl's still "out there somewhere"? get real. 

you may fool a lot of people for little time; not as many for a long time; but no one will fool everyone forever.

justice will be made. Either the easy, or the hard way.

_____________________
m&#038;a 
edited
-meercat
relaw0400</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>funny thing to me is that&#8230;</p>
<p>is there anyone out there who truly believes Maddie&#8217;s alive?</p>
<p>nothing on Mr Amaral&#8217;s book is made up. It&#8217;s all in the case files.</p>
<p>the guilty party - whoever that is - will never sue him as they know that is what he wants them to do, so that under the Portuguese law, the original case can be re-opened and that is something they simply don&#8217;t want to happen</p>
<p>Re-opening the process is out of the question. It&#8217;s a funny thing no UK publisher is willing to take the chance of publishing and distributing the English translation of the book. Who are they afraid of?&#8230;</p>
<p>There are far bigger fish in the sea, you know? the US would not mind getting it exposed. The truth, no mater how hard you try will ALWAYS prevail.</p>
<p>Think about it&#8230; do you believe the McCann&#8217;s for themselves or &#8217;cause you refuse to believe this whole circus grew way beyond anyones expectations? Do you truly believe the poor girl&#8217;s still &#8220;out there somewhere&#8221;? get real. </p>
<p>you may fool a lot of people for little time; not as many for a long time; but no one will fool everyone forever.</p>
<p>justice will be made. Either the easy, or the hard way.</p>
<p>_____________________<br />
m&#038;a<br />
edited<br />
-meercat<br />
relaw0400</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just_me</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351142</link>
		<dc:creator>just_me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351142</guid>
		<description>noooo fred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noooo fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandolf</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351129</link>
		<dc:creator>Gandolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351129</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Aqui mim está pensando que você entendeu jo português, evidentemente não, AG está estando jo?&lt;/b&gt;

So is the AG lying jo........?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Aqui mim está pensando que você entendeu jo português, evidentemente não, AG está estando jo?</b></p>
<p>So is the AG lying jo&#8230;&#8230;..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351128</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351128</guid>
		<description>....and before I go 

JUSTICIA PARA MADELEINE
VIVA PORTUGAL
VIVA LA DEMOCRACIA

Surely,Gandolf can provide us with  a translation?   :lol:   :lol:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.and before I go </p>
<p>JUSTICIA PARA MADELEINE<br />
VIVA PORTUGAL<br />
VIVA LA DEMOCRACIA</p>
<p>Surely,Gandolf can provide us with  a translation?   <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' />   <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_lol.gif' alt=':lol:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandolf</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351127</link>
		<dc:creator>Gandolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351127</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Here is an update for the denial brigade, formerly known as the antis. 

Portugal's top law officer has said there is no evidence against any of the former arguidos. 

A question.....are the denial brigade implying that Portugal's top law officer is lying....or something even more sinister.
 Come on let's be hearing if you think the gentleman is out of touch with reality, although evidently not as much as the denial brigade.........so is he lying in your view denial brigade ? &lt;/b&gt;

M and A

Good morning Gandolf

He actually said there was no evidence of any crime, this would include abduction, so it means she wandered off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Here is an update for the denial brigade, formerly known as the antis. </p>
<p>Portugal&#8217;s top law officer has said there is no evidence against any of the former arguidos. </p>
<p>A question&#8230;..are the denial brigade implying that Portugal&#8217;s top law officer is lying&#8230;.or something even more sinister.<br />
 Come on let&#8217;s be hearing if you think the gentleman is out of touch with reality, although evidently not as much as the denial brigade&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;so is he lying in your view denial brigade ? </b></p>
<p>M and A</p>
<p>Good morning Gandolf</p>
<p>He actually said there was no evidence of any crime, this would include abduction, so it means she wandered off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351125</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351125</guid>
		<description>m.e. Says: 

July 26th, 2008 at 6:17 am 
I am certain there was an abduction.
I am certain the McCanns are innocent.
I am certain that I have not been planted…or paid…

…..for my sarcasm.
*********
103% sure?  :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m.e. Says: </p>
<p>July 26th, 2008 at 6:17 am<br />
I am certain there was an abduction.<br />
I am certain the McCanns are innocent.<br />
I am certain that I have not been planted…or paid…</p>
<p>…..for my sarcasm.<br />
*********<br />
103% sure?  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351124</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351124</guid>
		<description>26/07/08 
McCanns's Censure Portuguese Democracy and Freedom of Speech
 
If it was only in Portugal.....
Mr.&#38;Mrs Mccanninum,this is one of the worst thing you could do  :mrgreen:


http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/07/mccannss-censure-portuguese-democracy.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>26/07/08<br />
McCanns&#8217;s Censure Portuguese Democracy and Freedom of Speech</p>
<p>If it was only in Portugal&#8230;..<br />
Mr.&amp;Mrs Mccanninum,this is one of the worst thing you could do  <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/07/mccannss-censure-portuguese-democracy.html" rel="nofollow">http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/07/mccannss-censure-portuguese-democracy.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351123</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 06:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351123</guid>
		<description>Good morning :smile:

Disclosure: Kate's Notes gives reason to Gonçalo Amaral 

"To increase the political pressure." The sentence, by Kate McCann, written in notes found at her house and that the Judiciary Police(PJ)requested to be apprehend,is clear as to the way Maddie's parents were intending to manage the disappearance of the daughter, bringing it to the first pages of the Press and turning it into a case with political outlines.

More later.... 

Aye! Facts or fiction?

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':smile:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Disclosure: Kate&#8217;s Notes gives reason to Gonçalo Amaral </p>
<p>&#8220;To increase the political pressure.&#8221; The sentence, by Kate McCann, written in notes found at her house and that the Judiciary Police(PJ)requested to be apprehend,is clear as to the way Maddie&#8217;s parents were intending to manage the disappearance of the daughter, bringing it to the first pages of the Press and turning it into a case with political outlines.</p>
<p>More later&#8230;. </p>
<p>Aye! Facts or fiction?</p>
<p><a href="http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandolf</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351122</link>
		<dc:creator>Gandolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351122</guid>
		<description>Jings! she is more powerful than Maggie...........    http://tinyurl.com/55jnmw

TTFN again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jings! she is more powerful than Maggie&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..    <a href="http://tinyurl.com/55jnmw" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/55jnmw</a></p>
<p>TTFN again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m.e.</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351121</link>
		<dc:creator>m.e.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351121</guid>
		<description>I am certain there was an abduction.
I am certain the McCanns are innocent.
I am certain that I have not been planted...or paid...

.....for my sarcasm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am certain there was an abduction.<br />
I am certain the McCanns are innocent.<br />
I am certain that I have not been planted&#8230;or paid&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;..for my sarcasm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gandolf</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351120</link>
		<dc:creator>Gandolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351120</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;OK windylickers, listen up, we are going to clarify the situation, as it is in reality land, not Chatta the hot bitch's fairytale land...............#

One day in a far of land a new sheriff was appointed, he had heard the story of the King has no clothes and decided I will base the results of my clarifying upon this wonderful story.
So he ordered all his plod to leave no stone unturned and no page unread, he ordered his hand picked plod to examine all of the previous plods ahem, evidence.
After many months of painstaking searching and examining of all sorts of blind alleys, the sheriff got a call from his prosecutor, who in turn had his arse kicked by the new AG.
We must have final report before the month is out the AG wants to know if the King has any clothes, the prosecutor tells the sheriff, ffs is he nuts says the chief plod....everyone knows we got fuck all..........except the anti's.

However I digress, the report was duly finalised and the AG issued his edict, NO EVIDENCE AND NO CLOTHES.
But the multitude of windylickers, who are the anti's did not have their ear trumpets or white sticks available at the time, lots of them are impressed with the Kings lovely new clothes, as they tell us every day.

The fragrant duo targeted by the great unwashed windylickers, have their own fairy godmother in the form of "Carter give us the money you are getting Fuked"

The get Carter mob have the ogre Amaral firmly in the line of their magic money wand, more dosh for the fragrant duo to continue the search for the missing Princess Madeleine.

So to summary.......NO EVIDENCE .....NO CLOTHES.........NO POST MORTEM EVIDENCE.......IN SHORT,............... NO EVIDENCE....PERIOD.

To be continued in the court of Justice Hogg, did you know that a deceased minor cannot be a ward of court. Madeleine McCann is a ward of court, under the sainted Lady's court.

I do like to remind the windy lickers of the facts, did you know the doggie evidence was totally useless, did you know that cadaverine is also produced by living people.......you do now...........when your lickin windaes, George Formby sings it, you should buy it......TTFN.  &lt;/b&gt;

Mods and  Admin

Yes Gandolf, she wandered off while left alone, the fragrant duo were out at the tapas bar

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>OK windylickers, listen up, we are going to clarify the situation, as it is in reality land, not Chatta the hot bitch&#8217;s fairytale land&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;#</p>
<p>One day in a far of land a new sheriff was appointed, he had heard the story of the King has no clothes and decided I will base the results of my clarifying upon this wonderful story.<br />
So he ordered all his plod to leave no stone unturned and no page unread, he ordered his hand picked plod to examine all of the previous plods ahem, evidence.<br />
After many months of painstaking searching and examining of all sorts of blind alleys, the sheriff got a call from his prosecutor, who in turn had his arse kicked by the new AG.<br />
We must have final report before the month is out the AG wants to know if the King has any clothes, the prosecutor tells the sheriff, ffs is he nuts says the chief plod&#8230;.everyone knows we got fuck all&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.except the anti&#8217;s.</p>
<p>However I digress, the report was duly finalised and the AG issued his edict, NO EVIDENCE AND NO CLOTHES.<br />
But the multitude of windylickers, who are the anti&#8217;s did not have their ear trumpets or white sticks available at the time, lots of them are impressed with the Kings lovely new clothes, as they tell us every day.</p>
<p>The fragrant duo targeted by the great unwashed windylickers, have their own fairy godmother in the form of &#8220;Carter give us the money you are getting Fuked&#8221;</p>
<p>The get Carter mob have the ogre Amaral firmly in the line of their magic money wand, more dosh for the fragrant duo to continue the search for the missing Princess Madeleine.</p>
<p>So to summary&#8230;&#8230;.NO EVIDENCE &#8230;..NO CLOTHES&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;NO POST MORTEM EVIDENCE&#8230;&#8230;.IN SHORT,&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; NO EVIDENCE&#8230;.PERIOD.</p>
<p>To be continued in the court of Justice Hogg, did you know that a deceased minor cannot be a ward of court. Madeleine McCann is a ward of court, under the sainted Lady&#8217;s court.</p>
<p>I do like to remind the windy lickers of the facts, did you know the doggie evidence was totally useless, did you know that cadaverine is also produced by living people&#8230;&#8230;.you do now&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..when your lickin windaes, George Formby sings it, you should buy it&#8230;&#8230;TTFN.  </b></p>
<p>Mods and  Admin</p>
<p>Yes Gandolf, she wandered off while left alone, the fragrant duo were out at the tapas bar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I 8 Tapas</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351113</link>
		<dc:creator>I 8 Tapas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351113</guid>
		<description>Karen Says: 

July 25th, 2008 at 5:07 pm 
whoops

Gerry and Kate both come from Irish Catholic families - almost all Irish Catholics I know (without Prod relatives) in Scotland anyway, think that the Freemasons are an anti-Catholic organisation and avoid it like the plague - I really can’t see Gerry being in it.

true but non religious professionals join. Some people love the elitism. Mccanns only became religious after the disappearence, I think. i know of masons from Catholic backgrounds.
On the video; i think it's irrelevant. Lots of people are cranky while travelling, it doesn't make them murderers or abusers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen Says: </p>
<p>July 25th, 2008 at 5:07 pm<br />
whoops</p>
<p>Gerry and Kate both come from Irish Catholic families - almost all Irish Catholics I know (without Prod relatives) in Scotland anyway, think that the Freemasons are an anti-Catholic organisation and avoid it like the plague - I really can’t see Gerry being in it.</p>
<p>true but non religious professionals join. Some people love the elitism. Mccanns only became religious after the disappearence, I think. i know of masons from Catholic backgrounds.<br />
On the video; i think it&#8217;s irrelevant. Lots of people are cranky while travelling, it doesn&#8217;t make them murderers or abusers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyn</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351111</link>
		<dc:creator>lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351111</guid>
		<description>What happened to the holiday snaps that GM "lost".  Doubt anyone loses holiday snaps! For blood to have been found in the apartment some time after arriving, the injury must have been a bad one and being doctors, surely it would have been attended to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to the holiday snaps that GM &#8220;lost&#8221;.  Doubt anyone loses holiday snaps! For blood to have been found in the apartment some time after arriving, the injury must have been a bad one and being doctors, surely it would have been attended to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie1</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351109</link>
		<dc:creator>annie1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351109</guid>
		<description>Just when you thought it was all over - watch this , I tried to search form the McCann youtube and this was the first one relevant to "McCann" - what on God's earth is going on???http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=ENCiy4TYR7E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when you thought it was all over - watch this , I tried to search form the McCann youtube and this was the first one relevant to &#8220;McCann&#8221; - what on God&#8217;s earth is going on???http://nz.youtube.com/watch?v=ENCiy4TYR7E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351108</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351108</guid>
		<description>goodnight annie and all from me too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goodnight annie and all from me too <img src='http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351107</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351107</guid>
		<description>annie1 Says: 
 July 26th, 2008 at 1:37 am 
Sam - my point was really that someone thought it was relevant to put it on y.t. but who? It brought no light on the issue of Madeleine being found, it gave no indication of why she may have gone, so why put that particular snip on yt?

it doesn't show though that maddie had a knee injury and nor do any of the pictures, only one picture shows her legs, the one on the tennis grounds, all others do not show her knee or any injury which apparently she had when climbing up to the stairs on the plane, and which apparently explained the blood in the appartment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>annie1 Says:<br />
 July 26th, 2008 at 1:37 am<br />
Sam - my point was really that someone thought it was relevant to put it on y.t. but who? It brought no light on the issue of Madeleine being found, it gave no indication of why she may have gone, so why put that particular snip on yt?</p>
<p>it doesn&#8217;t show though that maddie had a knee injury and nor do any of the pictures, only one picture shows her legs, the one on the tennis grounds, all others do not show her knee or any injury which apparently she had when climbing up to the stairs on the plane, and which apparently explained the blood in the appartment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie1</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351106</link>
		<dc:creator>annie1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351106</guid>
		<description>Agreed - it is getting late and the mind runs riots= nite everyone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed - it is getting late and the mind runs riots= nite everyone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351105</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351105</guid>
		<description>annie1 Says: 
 July 26th, 2008 at 1:37 am 

'Sam - my point was really that someone thought it was relevant to put it on y.t. but who? It brought no light on the issue of Madeleine being found, it gave no indication of why she may have gone, so why put that particular snip on yt?

i honestly don't know, at one time i had the thought that maybe it wasn't a holiday, that maybe the whole thing was planned, so surreal have been parts of it, of maddies disappearance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>annie1 Says:<br />
 July 26th, 2008 at 1:37 am </p>
<p>&#8216;Sam - my point was really that someone thought it was relevant to put it on y.t. but who? It brought no light on the issue of Madeleine being found, it gave no indication of why she may have gone, so why put that particular snip on yt?</p>
<p>i honestly don&#8217;t know, at one time i had the thought that maybe it wasn&#8217;t a holiday, that maybe the whole thing was planned, so surreal have been parts of it, of maddies disappearance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annie1</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351104</link>
		<dc:creator>annie1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351104</guid>
		<description>Sam - my point was really that someone thought it was relevant to put it on y.t. but who?  It brought no light on the issue of Madeleine being found, it gave no indication of why she may have gone, so why put that particular snip on yt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam - my point was really that someone thought it was relevant to put it on y.t. but who?  It brought no light on the issue of Madeleine being found, it gave no indication of why she may have gone, so why put that particular snip on yt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186347.html#comment-351103</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anorak.co.uk/?p=186347#comment-351103</guid>
		<description>Cheryl Says: 
 July 26th, 2008 at 1:25 am

'Yes it was you’ll note Fox’s lawyer had it moved to another state where the libel laws are tougher on proof. However, win some lose some. But in the end they have won! My real regret in cases such as theirs is that every person who helped ruin their lives, smeared their names, carried on the campaign against them for years could not all be brought to trial and exposed. Like forget the monetary damages just put their names in front pages of the papers with a written apology. True Justice at its best!'

if they were or are innocent then yes, if not it's a travesty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheryl Says:<br />
 July 26th, 2008 at 1:25 am</p>
<p>&#8216;Yes it was you’ll note Fox’s lawyer had it moved to another state where the libel laws are tougher on proof. However, win some lose some. But in the end they have won! My real regret in cases such as theirs is that every person who helped ruin their lives, smeared their names, carried on the campaign against them for years could not all be brought to trial and exposed. Like forget the monetary damages just put their names in front pages of the papers with a written apology. True Justice at its best!&#8217;</p>
<p>if they were or are innocent then yes, if not it&#8217;s a travesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
