
Madeleine McCann: Daily Mirror Flies Anna Stam To London
MADELEINE McCann: An Anorak reader sends news of tomorrow’s tabloid sensation, translated from the Dutch.
What good can come of Anna Stam - Maddie spotter; one of many - meeting with Kate McCann, a meeting arranged by a tabloid paper?
The story:
AMSTERDAM - De Amsterdamse Anna Stam is gisteravond naar Londen gevlogen voor een ontmoeting met de ouders van de vorig jaar verdwenen Madeleine McCann.
Last night Anna Stam of Amsterdam has flown to London for a meeting with the parents of Madeleine McCann, who disappeared last year.
Op kosten van de Britse tabloid The Daily Mirror zal ze vertellen dat ze Maddie ‘misschien’ heeft gezien.
Costs being met by the British tabloid The Daily Mirror, she will tell them that she “maybe” has seen Maddie.
Vorig jaar mei werd Stam, medewerkster van een feestartikelenwinkel in Amsterdam-Oost, aangesproken door een Brits meisje van een jaar of vier.
Last year May, Stam, assistant in a party goods shop in Amsterdam-East, was addressed by a British girl of approx. 4 years old.
”Of ik wist waar haar mummy was,” zegt Stam.
“She wanted to know if I knew where her Mommy was,” says Stam.
Toen ze naar de vrouw wees met wie ze was binnengekomen, schudde het meisje haar hoofd.
When she pointed to the women with whom she had entered, the girl shook her head.
”Dat is niet mijn moeder, zei ze, dat is een vreemde.”
“That’s not my mother”, she said, “that’s a stranger.”
Volgens Stam zei het meisje dat de vrouw haar had weggehaald bij haar moeder op vakantie, waar kon ze niet zeggen.
According to Stam the girl said that the woman had taken her away from her mother on holidays, but couldn’t say where.
Stam: ”Toen vroeg ik hoe ze heette. Ik dacht eerst dat ze ‘Maggie’ zei, maar ze verbeterde me: ‘Ik heet Maddie’.”
Stam: “Then I asked what her name was. At first I thought she saod Maggie, but she corrected me: ”My name is Maddie”.”
Het nieuws van de ontvoering van Madeleine McCann uit een appartementencomplex in Portugal had Nederland toen nog niet bereikt.
At the time the news about the abduction of Madeleine MxCann from an apartment building in Portugal hadn’t reached the Netherlands yet.
Toen Stam een week later een foto van het meisje op tv zag, heeft ze zich bij de politie gemeld.
When a week later Stam saw a photo of the girl on television, she reported to the police.
Stam: ”Of het echt Maddie was, weet ik niet zeker.
Stam: “If it really was Maddie, I don’t know for sure.
Maar hopelijk hebben de ouders er iets aan en houden ze hoop dat ze ooit nog gevonden wordt.”
But hopefully it helps the parent and they keep hope that she will still be found one day.
(JASPER KARMAN)
Posted: 7th, August 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (418) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





December 31st, 2008 at 6:48 pm
maybe anna stam could have another chance at seeing maddie and getting her away from the strangers and to her parents
August 8th, 2008 at 10:55 pm
You are on the wrong thread Pet.
August 8th, 2008 at 10:53 pm
Talk to Mohammed Weirdy- Man! And stop going on about it!
Gandolf Says:
August 8th, 2008 at 5:05 am
I am ensuring that the less well informed are aware that there are no arguidos, no evidence against the the loving couple, also that dogs are fallible.
I am also pointing out that people who refer to nine year old virgins as some sort of joke, are sick in the head and soul.
We did use to have the creme de la creme of insults flying about here, now it is just gratuitous mind numbing nonsense.
Must get some sleep, bone daddy in 5 hours.
________________________
m&a
for the glory days of spudgun and teddyboy
… there is of course, Coco
-meercat
August 8th, 2008 at 10:50 pm
GANDOLF! GANDOLF! GANDOLF! AHA!!!!! I told you I had struck a nerve with you yesterday - you Weirdy-Man!
…………………………………………………….
Gandolf Says:
August 8th, 2008 at 3:48 am
coco Says:
August 7th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
‘NINE YEAR OLD VIRGINS’!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would say that people who post comments like the above, and see it as some sort of joke, are sick in the head and soul, I rest my case.
……………………………………….
You see Gandolf …….. This proves what an ill-bred, uncultured and person you are! Obviusly never read a book in your miserable life!
You have just insulted everybody in thae Islamic world by this comment. You are an oicky Weirdy-Man.
August 8th, 2008 at 8:49 am
Been reading the comedy duo this morning….
have to appeciate comments like this:
# Gandolf Says:
August 8th, 2008 at 6:48 am
Most people including me, find it offensive to use children in sexual jibes, if you think it is a return to the glory days that a poster uses that form of reference that is your choice, it certainly isn’t mine or the vast majority of decent peoples.
Forget the moral high ground (re kiddies) but trying to claim decency after the disgusting posts earlier, well you couldnt make it up!
The offensive thing here is the complete lack of responsibility assumed for the loss of a baby.
August 8th, 2008 at 8:41 am
new thread
August 8th, 2008 at 8:33 am
CHERYL FERGISON for phat phil
http://tinyurl.com/56o5n7
August 8th, 2008 at 8:29 am
Regarding this article from the Sun
http://tinyurl.com/5lf2rw
“107 sightings were reported….37 came from clairvoyants.”
“She was with a man and a woman. I thought it was strange because they didn’t look alike physically. They definitely were not from the same family.” -Why bother with DNA for paternity testing then?
“Her suspicions were further aroused when the three seemed to be communicating in different languages. “- In a trilingual country with Brussels being the centre of the EU… that is indeed strange.
“they looked rough.” - well they had that in common at least
“They then passed my details on to the federal police, who sent around a woman officer several weeks later.” - no stone unturned there, then.
“The files also reveal a British national saw a girl like Maddie asleep, possibly drugged, on a Brussels to Antwerp train” - possibly drugged, just like Sean and Amelie????
“She was with a 6ft man” - let’s all look for a 6ft man then - along with the 1.78m Bundleman
“And yesterday it emerged a man saw a little girl sitting on her own and crying in the Panorama restaurant at Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport.” - and…. no that’s it, there’s no and…
I know this is just the Sun but even for the Sun I think this plumbs new depths of reporting.
August 8th, 2008 at 8:25 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhSzs1iS2jI&feature=related
ITN on amarals book
August 8th, 2008 at 8:21 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EltiyzoSeBk
Goncalo Amaral part one
August 8th, 2008 at 8:17 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m8_pOzLfvCI
Anna stam
August 8th, 2008 at 8:16 am
Gandolf said, from his pulpit:
Most people including me, find it offensive to use children in sexual jibes, if you think it is a return to the glory days that a poster uses that form of reference that is your choice, it certainly isn’t mine or the vast majority of decent peoples.
Administrator: For once, I am in total agreement with Gandolf(s).
One question though. Which (I) is taking the moral high ground and which personality is going to see the saw bones in the longest non-working leg-pull story in the known universe? -agw
August 8th, 2008 at 8:15 am
And Dave ?
When does he/she turn up ?
August 8th, 2008 at 8:14 am
“New rota lads”
“Larry, 08:00 to 16:00″
“Curly, 16:00 to Midnight”
“Mo, Midnight to 08:00″
August 8th, 2008 at 8:13 am
Terry scott for Gerry!
August 8th, 2008 at 8:11 am
Hi Gandolf! I DO like him. Re the lady who told off the boys, I wouldn’t have. Discretion is the better part of valour.
Re the YouTube, unbiased much?
Claire Goose to play Kate McCann.
August 8th, 2008 at 8:05 am
how much is the stam-mering one getting paid?
i love this clutching at straws tactic
they actually think they can carry on blaming everyone else’s plods and everyone else
soon there will only be two whiney-voiced cretins left to blame
excellent sport
August 8th, 2008 at 8:05 am
coco Says:
August 8th, 2008 at 1:20 am
Re….”Why the letter ?”.
Dr K’s response when advised that she was to attend for interview and to become
Arguida..”What will my parents think ?”…and “What will the Press think ?”…
seems to be a fair reason for a Narcissistic Personality to indulge in a bit of PR.
Added to that…the gradual awareness coming into the Public Arena that she may
not exactly be a 103% caring and protective mother etc, would be worrying for
her. Not that it may be true…but for purely “What would people think ?” reasons.
August 8th, 2008 at 7:48 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwEdZt0bX5U
new video about DNA / FSS - Case Maddie
August 8th, 2008 at 7:45 am
Politicians say no comment, why would the good doctor say it?
August 8th, 2008 at 7:42 am
About that ………. no comment….
August 8th, 2008 at 7:41 am
Or definative evidence to rule out anything! Thats why it is put on hold.
Till something does.
There was a cadaver in apartment 5A an unreported one.
There was a report of a missing child. She is still missing.
August 8th, 2008 at 7:32 am
A straight forward question, what gives anyone the carte blanche to villify the McCanns, when there is no evidence of any involvement in any crime, and according to the Portuguese that would include neglect.
Put up or shut up is the expression…………don’t come back with the evidence of no abduction nonsense…..,no one has any definitive evidence to rule out abduction.
TTFN.
August 8th, 2008 at 7:13 am
So now the photo stuff comes out !!!
August 8th, 2008 at 6:48 am
Most people including me, find it offensive to use children in sexual jibes, if you think it is a return to the glory days that a poster uses that form of reference that is your choice, it certainly isn’t mine or the vast majority of decent peoples.
Administrator: For once I am in total agreement with Gandolf(s). One question though. Which (I) is taking the moral high ground and which personality is going to see the saw bones in the longest non-working leg-pull story in the known universe? -agw.
August 8th, 2008 at 5:05 am
I am ensuring that the less well informed are aware that there are no arguidos, no evidence against the the loving couple, also that dogs are fallible.
I am also pointing out that people who refer to nine year old virgins as some sort of joke, are sick in the head and soul.
We did use to have the creme de la creme of insults flying about here, now it is just gratuitous mind numbing nonsense.
Must get some sleep, bone daddy in 5 hours.
________________________
m&a
for the glory days of spudgun and teddyboy
… there is of course, Coco
-meercat
August 8th, 2008 at 4:43 am
Hi Gandy
What are you doing up so late or early? Are you in mortal agony?
August 8th, 2008 at 4:20 am
I have posted this before, just to remind dog lovers…..how fallible dogs are.
http://www.pawsoflife.org/pdf/Library%20articles/carpet%20squares.pdf
August 8th, 2008 at 4:12 am
Appears that the Belgian plod perhaps know more than they would like us to think they do.
http://tinyurl.com/5lf2rw
August 8th, 2008 at 4:08 am
It appears something may have been lost in translation about the Belgian plod not being aware of anything.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/maddie/article1531641.ece
August 8th, 2008 at 3:48 am
coco Says:
August 7th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
‘NINE YEAR OLD VIRGINS’!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I would say that people who post comments like the above, and see it as some sort of joke, are sick in the head and soul, I rest my case.