Nuts | Anorak

Posts Tagged ‘Nuts’

FSA orders supermarket chain to remove packet of monkey nuts because label does not say they contain nuts


NO. You cannot buy monkey nuts from branches of Boots in Lancashire. The store chain has withdrawn its 350g bags of monkey nuts because the label fails to state that the monkey nuts contain (you’re ahead of us) nuts.

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has ordered 300 packets of 350g Whole Hearted Roasted Monkey Nuts to be removed from sight.

Booths technical manager Waheed Hassan tells media:

“It is our responsibility as retailers to accurately record allergy advice. In this instance, we felt a responsibility to recall the product and issue a notice to our customers who might suffer from a specific peanut allergy.”

The company adds:

If you have an allergy to peanuts, please do not consume this product and return it to your local store for a full refund. No other products are affected by this issue and we sincerely apologise for the inconvenience caused.”

World ends.

Posted: 26th, April 2013 | In: Reviews, Strange But True | Comment (1) | Comments RSS feed:RSS 2.0

Nuts Relaunches As Magazine Full Of Babes, Girls, Women And Strumpets

NUTS magazine has been in the doldrums. It sells well, but sale are 20% down to 142,212 year on the year. What can the publishers IPC do to reverse the magazine’s fortunes? Well, they commissioned logs of market research. This research went on for six months. And the results are in. As the Guardian reports:

Nuts is sticking to its tried and trusted formula of girls, humour, cars and sport.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted: 16th, August 2011 | In: The Consumer | Comment | Comments RSS feed:RSS 2.0

The Burj Al Arab Food Fails

ANORAK went to Dubai to look for the supercar graveyard and instead found a 4×4 graveyard at the airport – cars abandoned by ex-pats disenchanted with the hideous dream in the fascist sands.

One other memorable scene was this at the Bab al Yam eaterie:

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted: 25th, May 2009 | In: Strange But True | Comment (1) | Comments RSS feed:RSS 2.0