Comments on: Jacqui Smith: How To Take Drugs And Get Away With It

By: Petronius

Petronius — Thu, 15 May 2008 14:26:05 +0000

Not as good as when Jack Straw was in charge of Drugs policy after his son was caught with a significant amount of Cannabis. Another friend caught with the same alleged amount got 3 years for a first time offence, rather than a caution, like Jack’s son did. There is also the thing about his brother that the hacks go on about, people on registers (allegedly), and in charge of them too.

Jack always used to pause when he mentioned drugs, it was a great slip as he checked he was getting his words right.

Just like with the Tories, be tough on people that you don’t really have any dealings with, introduce policies that don’t affect you like the ones used on flights for security and etc.

Jaqui, she’s great, she gets all mumsey when explaining the 42 day limit or the “dangers” of super Skunk, when in the early 1980s you could get hold of Temple Ball from Nepal which was easily 5 times as strong.

That’s right, just be all mumsey about it and get it past the credulous public that way, for both Jacks and Harriet it’s worked on Newsnight without a demur.

Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime that don’t involve us or ours. I believe that’s called an Oligarchy, Madam, Ma’m, Mum…

By: firestar

firestar — Thu, 15 May 2008 11:54:18 +0000

talking about crimanally insane, theres a bloke in mondays times saying cannabis is so bad he’d rather people were addicted to heroin, as you can
‘come off it without damage’.

if these people are being listened to, it’s not the smokers they should be locking up. it’s the stupid advisors.

hope he remembers what he said if he ever actually meets a smackhead who has no cash and is rattling his bollocks off.

By: JuneJohnson

JuneJohnson — Thu, 15 May 2008 11:37:00 +0000

so the choices are be driven criminally insane, driven into politics or happily nuts, ok now we know