http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/182221.html Tabloid news for broadsheet readers Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:13:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/182221.html#comment-263407 BabyJane Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:07:57 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/182221.html#comment-263407 1 + 2 It's not *yawn*, it's about somebody beeing a breath away, while another somebody probably had to breathe through the nose, because other canals were occupied. 1 + 2
It’s not *yawn*, it’s about somebody beeing a breath away, while another somebody probably had to breathe through the nose, because other canals were occupied.

]]> http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/182221.html#comment-263330 Ann Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:38:18 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/182221.html#comment-263330 Not a lot !! in fact it is a pretty pointless piece of "journalism" . What COULD have happened I suppose, is that Hillary could have walked in on them, then that would have been newsworthy but the fact that she was in the building, which is huuuuuge at the same time is somewhat irrelevant, so, I expect, were endless Secretaries, domestic staff, visitors etc etc etc ad nauseam....so ...like you said, "what does this have to do with Hillary ? " ....yawn....... Not a lot !! in fact it is a pretty pointless piece of “journalism” . What COULD have happened I suppose, is that Hillary could have walked in on them, then that would have been newsworthy but the fact that she was in the building, which is huuuuuge at the same time is somewhat irrelevant, so, I expect, were endless Secretaries, domestic staff, visitors etc etc etc ad nauseam….so …like you said, “what does this have to do with Hillary ? ” ….yawn…….

]]> http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/182221.html#comment-263042 lois cosentini Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:45:57 +0000 http://www.anorak.co.uk/twitterings/182221.html#comment-263042 what does this have to do with hillary? what does this have to do with hillary?

]]>