Archbishop of Canterbury: UK Adopts Aspects Of Sharia Law
SAYS Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury:
But Dr Williams says the argument that “there’s one law for everybody… I think that’s a bit of a danger”.”There’s a place for finding what would be a constructive accommodation with some aspects of Muslim law, as we already do with some other aspects of religious law.”
Dr Williams adds: “What we don’t want either, is I think, a stand-off, where the law squares up to people’s religious consciences.”
“We don’t either want a situation where, because there’s no way of legally monitoring what communities do… people do what they like in private in such a way that that becomes another way of intensifying oppression inside a community.”
You can convert to Christianity, and tread the path to salvation. Yet here is the head of the Church of England enthusing about another religion. It’s not Islamaphobia it’s Islamaphilia, an obsession with all things Muslim.
Williams advances the idea that Muslims are so totally different to the rest of society they must be legislated for. His views are at best patronising, and at worst divisive.
Williams says the adoption of certain aspects of Sharia law in the UK “seems unavoidable”. Dr Williams argues that adopting parts of Islamic Sharia law would help maintain social cohesion.
Better to stop singling one group out for special treatment and worthy of his special thoughts and comments, and just let us all exist as equals…
READ SOME COMMENTS:
He must resign as he is so not fit for public office. Thoughtless comments by a public figure once again shows his true colours.
Tim,
I think this is to be expected from an Archbishop who no longer believes in the religion he is the head of. Dr Williams is a good man who means well, but should step down and let someone with a greater belief in his actions take charge.
Richard,
The Archbishop said: ‘we have to “face up to the fact” that some of its citizens do not relate to the British legal system’. It is very disconcerting 1) that he cannot see the contradiction: one is a ‘citizen’ ONLY when subject to the law of the land; 2) thereby proves incompetence for speaking out of place, as politician rather than champion of his Christian values; 3) indeed, forsakes duty not extolling the christian humanism that is misrecognised bedrock of all western tolerance and reason.
m dury,
I can’t believe what I am hearing especially from the leader of the Christian church in this country
Tony May, Petersfield Hants
Over my dead body!
This is a despicable thing to say and as far as I’m concerned is tantamount to treason!
[Spiritflier],
The Muslims I know are quite horrified by these comments by the Arch Bishop and said he obviously does not understand what he is asking for and THEY would not want this extreme legal system in any form in the
What is the matter with this country? We are the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and hopefuly will always remain. So either we have British Law for all or you get anarchy… if you don’t like our laws, move!
Lee Simm,
I don’t even live in the
[discomustache],
kevin, wirral
If I were living in a Muslim country would that country be tolerant towards any of my British ‘ideals’ ,’religion’ or laws?
The answer is ‘NO’
If people from different cultures want to come to make their lives in the
If they want to practice their own religion then that is their absolute right as long as it is at their own cost where any costs are involved.
As far as the British laws are concerned they should be subject to the laws of the
[marabray],
Hi,
Well if you going to accommodate the Muslims. Then I would also like Hindu’ and Sikh’s laws in the british legal system as well, as I am Hindu and wife is Sikh.
Why aren’t our Indian faith’s respected as much? Is that because we don’t go around blowing up innocent random people? Is this how you get what you want these days?
If Muslim doesn’t like British laws then should not LIVE IN THIS COUNTRY!!!!! Please go live where you have your Islamic law and be happy. LEAVE US ALONE.
Aman Sharma
I don’t see why not. Obviously it doesn’t mean stoning people in the streets, it would simply be stuff like divorces etc, if that’s how you want to practise divorce. We have christian law here in many respects and a very christian culture yet most the people in the country aren’t christian. Some Muslims already have Sharia law style divorces and marriages for ceremony and then have to have a christian one in a registry office to be legal and official anyway. Everyone is over-reacting here.
Liam Hanley, nottingham
This is an absolute outrage.
Who does this man think he is?
He should resign now.
His supposed to represent the ‘established’ christian church in what is still supposed to be a christian country.
It quite frankly beggars belief that this ‘wolley headed’ idiot can come out with such a proposterous proposition.
I hope the Church of England, of whom I am still nominally a member, is really pleased with itself.
Just go now Williams and leave the keys to
Anthony Jeffrey
Your thoughts, please…

February 7th, 2008 at 5:15 pm
You can’t someone with eyebrows like that seriously. Has he never heard of scissors?
February 7th, 2008 at 5:19 pm
Sharia law eh?

What next?
February 7th, 2008 at 5:24 pm
I’ve got an idea, how about taking ALL religion out of the role of the state.
Bye bye Anglican establishment….
February 7th, 2008 at 5:26 pm
What a silly old fart he is!
February 7th, 2008 at 5:35 pm
bring back Paganism
February 7th, 2008 at 5:52 pm
I reckon the beardie old git is a recruiting officer for the BNP. in his spare time
He’s doing a fine job for them, spouting such ill-conceived bollocks as this little lot.
February 7th, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Spot the deliberate mistake…..
Naturally I meant to say…… you can’t TRUST someone with eyebrows like that….
————
Mods and Admin
Wrong post , but I don’t care
carry on about the Kursaal flyers etc and I’ll MAKE you dance round your handbag wearing your white stilettoes at TOTS.
February 7th, 2008 at 7:07 pm
I knew I’d seen you somewhere!!!!!! aaahhh those were the days eh?
February 7th, 2008 at 7:47 pm
I think he is only opting for the Muslim Law because it will give him the possibilty to ask for the(re) introduction of Anglican Religious Law :-(((
February 7th, 2008 at 8:23 pm
9
german in italy Says:
February 7th, 2008 at 7:47 pm
I think he is only opting for the Muslim Law because it will give him the possibilty to ask for t he(re) introduction of Anglican Religious Law :-(((
**********************************************************
Exactly what I was thinking. Sneaky little bushy eye-browed ick!
Really, isn’t there a way to get rid of these silly hatted people who’ve managed to climb the slippery slope to the top of the establishment heap and God, oh and Crown….and lord it over people with their ‘word’. What next? Pope’s law? I bet he’d have a problem with that!
5 JuneJohnson
How about Paganism and Mithras….
I hereby declare that I will follow Zen, or David Icke, or, hey maybe just my personal God law which stateth that religion is bollocks and people are capable of being ‘good’ people…..blah
———–
Mods andAdmin
Try Duncan for Buddhism, and my husband is definitely a Mithras follower, I’m just a lil ol witch
February 7th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
There is only one true God and that is the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Read the link and see the light.
http://www.venganza.org/about/open-letter/
February 7th, 2008 at 8:42 pm
I think he’s put his foot in it this time. There are Jewish Courts where the parties agree to arbitration. I suspect that is what he meant with his remarks. But is he so distanced from reality that he didn’t realise a plan to “introduce Sharia Law” might be a bit controversial?
What a twerp!
February 7th, 2008 at 8:46 pm
Mods & Admin
My kind ‘o people…(-: So which one…decisions decisions.
Don’t you get to sleep with lots of people in Buddhism……and what can Witches do?…Hmmm difficult.
February 7th, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Penster…. love the ‘pastafarians’.
……………………..
Mods and Admin. I like to believe in a little bit of everything, keep my options open just incase.
February 7th, 2008 at 8:55 pm
Thankyou coolandcalm. I myself am a committed pastafarian. naturally being a devotee of the flying spaghetti monster is at odds with my low carbohydrate lifestyle but i make the sacrifice for the betterment of humanity.
garlic bread anyone?
February 7th, 2008 at 8:58 pm
11 Penster
I am tweffended by your blashpwemmy. I am the onest twuest flying spaghetti monster.
Youest twill burneth in boiling Passatath hell forevermoreth.
Nooddlamen
February 7th, 2008 at 10:03 pm
Thank God I’m an atheist!
February 8th, 2008 at 12:22 am
16 slyfox I relish (tomato) being tortured for my beliefs. Go ahead and boil and bring me martyrdom but please remember to add salt. I will be reward in eternity with 40 virgin olive oils.
February 8th, 2008 at 7:53 am
I think its a good idea. Just imagine how much money would be saved on keeping prisoners in luxury and policing. Murders, rapists etc would be despatched pdq and thieves would not re-offend single handed. Public stoning of adulterers would become a sunday afternoon treat for the whole family, better than paying through the nose for sky tv.
February 8th, 2008 at 8:13 am
19 - and then we can export the show to other contries…
Last call for Jade Goody…
February 8th, 2008 at 8:27 am
Interesting how the few comments in favour have all come from Muslem MEN.
February 8th, 2008 at 8:27 am
Sharia Law. ?
Isn’t this one for FIFA?
It has to be simpler than the Offside Rule.
February 8th, 2008 at 9:20 am
Next thing you know, all the Aussie girls working behind bars in London will want to adopt Sheila Law.
February 8th, 2008 at 9:28 am
Thought Sheila’s Law was already enforced….
February 8th, 2008 at 10:12 am
There is already a Jewish court in London so this is already happening.
February 8th, 2008 at 10:34 am
May Says: (previously on the 2 fingers site)
February 8th, 2008 at 10:15 am
Yes, why not have Sharia law? Feel sure there are many citizens of the UK who would enthusiastically contribute to a public flogging of drunken youth and young vandals. And who’s going to miss the odd hand? That will teach them not to steal again.
I understand a man can divorce a woman by repeating three times that he no longer wants her. Could somebody enlighten me as to whether a woman is afforded the same privilege?
Think of the money to be saved by those indulging in cosmetic surgery, when all they need is to cover themselves with a burkah.
Bring on Sharia law. We’ll have a law abiding docile, male dominated society in no time.
February 8th, 2008 at 1:06 pm
teachers, religious leaders – even friends, or so called friends – take over where parents leave off. They demand that we feel only the feelings they want and expect from us. They demand all the time that we perform feelings for them. We’re like actors – turned loose in this world to wander in search of a phantom…endlessly searching for a half-forgotten shadow of our lost reality. When others demand that we become the people they want us to be, they force us to destroy the person we really are. It’s a subtle kind of murder….the most loving parents and relatives commit this murder with smiles on their faces.
February 8th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
The problem with Rowan Williams is that he has been A rather underwhelming Archbishop. His lack of leadership over gays in the church may have kept the extreemist African bishops on board, but at the cost of encouraging “queer bashing” and condoning bigotry. Now he wants Muslim gays in this country to be subject to the same bigotry. He should besacked for inciting crimes.