Anorak News | LibDem MP David Ward says Jews are Nazis – why can’t they be cossacks or Egyptians?

LibDem MP David Ward says Jews are Nazis – why can’t they be cossacks or Egyptians?

by | 26th, January 2013

IN readiness for Holocaust Memorial Day,  LibDem MP David Ward takes to his website to call the Jews Nazis:

“Having visited Auschwitz twice – once with my family and once with local schools – I am saddened that the Jews, who suffered unbelievable levels of persecution during the Holocaust, could within a few years of liberation from the death camps be inflicting atrocities on Palestinians in the new State of Israel and continue to do so on a daily basis in the West Bank and Gaza.”

He then adds:

“It appears that the suffering by the Jews has not transformed their views on how others should be treated”

Those barbaric Jews, eh. Will they never learn?
Can it be possible for anyone sane and not bigoted to compare the industrial murder of millions to Gaza? It is an egregious insult designed to hurt Jews and undermine their history. Israel’s population is 20% Arab. Their equal rights are enshrined in law. They are in Israel’s Army, football team and Parliament. But Ward’s not talking about Israel. He’s talking about those bloodthirsty Jews.
Why are the Jews always Nazis? Why can’t they be the Cossaks, Crusaders, Egyptians, Papists or any group that has attacked them? Why always the Nazis?
We’ve been here before. The Spectator published a few words on Holocaust Memorial Day by Anthony Lipmann:

I will think not just of the crematoria and the cattle trucks but of Darfur, Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Jenin, Fallujah.


“What would I have done?” I ask myself. “What should I be doing now? What am I doing for those being persecuted today – among them the Palestinians, who are suffering at the hands of Jews? But for a turn of fate, could I have been a Nazi too?… This little band of 600 [Holocaust survivors attending a reception hosted by the Queen] has a terrible responsibility – to live well in the name of those who did not live and to discourage the building of walls and bulldozing of villages.

Jewish Holocaust survivors are held to account for Israel? And Jenin? Mark Steyn wrote about it:
Jenin? Would that be the notorious 2002 “Jenin massacre”? There was no such thing, as I pointed out in this space at the time, when Robert Fisk and the rest of Fleet Street’s gullible sob-sisters were going around weepin’ an’ a-wailin’ about Palestinian mass graves and Israeli war crimes. Twenty-three Israelis were killed in fighting at the Jenin camp. Fifty-two Palestinians died, according to the Israelis. According to Arafat’s official investigators, it was 56 Palestinians. Even if one accepts the higher figure, that means every single deceased Palestinian could have his own mass grave and there’d still be room to inter the collected works of Robert Fisk. Yet, despite the fact that the Jenin massacre is an obvious hallucination of Fleet Street’s Palestine groupies, its rise to historical fact is unstoppable. To Lipmann, those 52-56 dead Palestinians weigh in the scales of history as heavy as six million Jews. And what’s Fallujah doing bringing up the rear in his catalogue of horrors? In rounding up a few hundred head-hackers, the Yanks perpetrated another Auschwitz? These comparisons are so absurd as to barely qualify as “moral equivalence”.

… The reality is that the nation states of the region all date back to the 1930s and 1940s: the only difference is that Israel, unlike Syria and Iraq, has made a go of it.

As for the notion that this or that people “deserve” a state, that’s a dangerous post-modern concept of nationality and sovereignty. The United States doesn’t exist because the colonists “deserved” a state, but because they went out and fought for one. Were the Palestinians to do that, they might succeed in pushing every last Jew into the sea, or they might win a less total victory, or they might be routed and have to flee to Damascus or Wolverhampton.

But, whatever the outcome, it’s hard to see that they would be any less comprehensively a wrecked people than they are after spending three generations in “refugee” “camps” while their “cause” is managed by a malign if impeccably multilateral coalition of UN bureaucrats, cynical Arab dictators, celebrity terrorists and meddling Europeans whose Palestinian fetishisation seems most explicable as the perverse by-product of the suppression of their traditional anti-Semitism.

There is a very good account of the British media’s race to believe the worst of the Jews in Jenin here and here. The Guardian went to town on the ‘massacre’.
Note: The Palestinian nationalist movement was by Nazi agent Haj Amin el Husseini. Mahmoud Abbas is a Holocaust denier. Calling Jews Nazis is loaded to appeal to racists and cause offence.
In 2011,USA Todaypublished this statement for the ‘Jews’ of Gaza:

“After the experience of the last 44 years of military occupation and all the conflict and friction, I think it would be in the best interest of the two people to be separated,” Maen Areikat, the PLO ambassador, said during a meeting with reporters, in response to a question about the rights of minorities in a Palestine of the future.

Such a state would be the first to officially prohibit Jews or any other faith since Nazi Germany, which sought a country that was judenrein, or cleansed of Jews, said Elliott Abrams, a former U.S. National Security Council official.

Israel has 1.3 million Muslims who are Israeli citizens. Jews have lived in “Judea and Samaria,” the biblical name for the West Bank, for thousands of years. Areikat said the PLO seeks a secular state, but that Palestinians need separation to work on their own national identity.

The Palestinian demand is unacceptable and “a despicable form of anti-Semitism,” Abrams said. A small Jewish presence in a future Palestine, up to 1% of the population, would not hurt the Palestinian identity, he said.

“No civilized country would act this way,” Abrams said.

In an interview with Haaretz in November 2010, British novelist Martin Amis had a few words on the casual anti-Semitic dinner party conversations that are acceptable in the UK:

I live in a mildly anti-Semitic country, and Europe is mildly anti-Semitic, and they hold Israel to a higher moral standard than its neighbors. If you bring up Israel in a public meeting in England, the whole atmosphere changes. The standard left-wing person never feels more comfortable than when attacking Israel. Because they are the only foreigners you can attack. Everyone else is protected by having dark skin, or colonial history, or something. But you can attack Israel. And the atmosphere becomes very unpleasant. It is traditional, snobbish, British  anti-Semitism combined with present-day circumstances.

David Ward might not be a fan of Israel, a country with many flaws. It’s just odd that with all the world’s wars and injustices happening right now, he selects Jews to be the Nazis…

NOTE: Holocaust Memorial Day marks the 68th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz concentration camp, where more than one million people – mostly Jews – died. Pictures of that death camp are here and here.


Posted: 26th, January 2013 | In: Politicians Comments (7) | TrackBack | Permalink