Madeleine McCann: An Accident, Susan Healy’s ‘Twisted’ Words And Metodo 3
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY EXPRESS: “front page: “MADELEINE: THREE NEW SIGHTINGS IN MOROCCO”
The McCanns private detectives are taking calls on the new “hotline”. Each caller says the “blonde, blue-eyed” Madeleine is with a 60-year-old “middle-Class” woman
Pages 4 and 5: “Clues lead to Morocco” – The Metodo 3 private detective agency is working on the theory Madeleine was kidnapped to order and smuggled to North Africa. Cross your fingers and start the expense account rolling, they’re going in
“New bungles of the Portuguese police”: Portuguese officers driving Robert Murat’s impounded camper van crashed it; British detectives are “horrified” Portuguese police failed to routinely quarantine vehicles
Hamish Brown, a former Scotland Yard detective, says: “It defies the rules of investigation.” (Get Mr Brown an agent)
DAILY MAIL front page: “Outrage over claims that Kate’s suicidal”
Page 7: “I just don’t know how long Kate will hold on for…What mother would not go insane if they lost a child?”
Susan Healy, Kate McCann’s mother, tells Portuguese magazine 24 Horas: “I don’t know if any human being can take such pressure”
Says the magazine’s headline: “Kate’s mother fears she will kill herself”
Says Clarence Mitchell: “It is beyond offensive to suggest Kate is suicidal. She is not.” Says the Mail: “Mrs McCann is a GP”
She has weekly counselling sessions. The Mail recalls other relatives saying how Kate is never left alone. A “friend” says Mrs Healy’s words have been “twisted”: “It’s ludicrous and yet another horrible slur”. The Mail says Kate McCann has “dark moments”
“POLICE CRASHED SUSPECT’S VAN” – Robert Murat vehicle is damaged. Policia Judiciaria inspectors drove the McCanns’ Renault Scenic to the pound rather than took it to headquarters on a trailer
THE STAR front page: “MADDIE: RICH ARAB FAMILY HAS HER”
Pages 4 and 5: “Callers tell phoneline they spotted blonde girl with mystery woman – ARABS NAB MADDIE”
Arabs? Oh… Can we invade?
Says a source “close” to the McCanns: “Obviously talk of Madeleine being bartered around by evil people is extremely upsetting for them. But for the first time a credible theory of what happened is being worked by one of Europe’s leading investigation agencies”
Forget the Portuguese police, Interpol and the British police. If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire… Metodo 3 are on the case. (Invoice in the post)
THE SUN page 11: “KATE’S HURTING BUT SHE IS NOT SUICIDAL – Maddie gran’s fury”
Susan Healy says Kate McCann will not kill herself because: “One, she still wants to find Madeleine and two, for the sake of the other children, Sean and Amelie”
“DNA BUNGLE COPS CRASH MURAT VAN” – Says Hamish Brown: “It’s positively wrong”
DAILY MIRROR page 11: “COPS CONTAMINATE CAR..BY DRIVING IT..and then they crash Murat van”
The paper produces a list of “BLUNDERS”:
Not sealing of the McCanns’ holiday flat
Not making early house-to-house enquiries
No fingertip search of resort
Early e-fit had no face
Not releasing details of what Madeleine was wearing
Being Portuguese (not stated)
THE TIMES page 14: “Madeleine in Morocco, says headline caller”.
The Times reproduces the sketch of a man seen by Jane Tanner carrying a child near the McCanns’ apartment. Like that Portuguese police’s “bungled” efit, there is no face
If you see this man call 0034-902 300213
DAILY TELEGRAPH page 10: “McCann team targets Morocco”
Three calls to the Private detectives. “One from a Spaniard, the other two from British people,” says the source.
More progress reports to follow…
THE GUARDIAN and THE INDEPENDENT: No Madeleine news today
Posted: 29th, October 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,360) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- yampster on Jesus Saves: Virgin Mary Opens Bank
- June on Fiona MacKeown’s Benefits Fraud Linked To Daughter Scarlett’s Rape And Murder
- June on X Factor: The Top Items For Sale In The Jedward Shop
- CC on Fiona MacKeown’s Benefits Fraud Linked To Daughter Scarlett’s Rape And Murder
- June on Fat Kate Moss Is New Face Of Starbucks, With Added Cellulite
November 22nd, 2007 at 7:56 pm
YOU ENGLISH PEOPLE MAKES ME SICK YOU TRY AND PUT YOU FOOT IN THEIR SHOES AND SEE IF YOU CAN UNDERSTAND JUST WHAT MADDIE PARENT ARE GOING THROUGH. NO ONE KNOWS WHAT HAPPEN AND I DON’T THINK KATE HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH MADDIE’S DISAPARENCE. THE REST OF THE WORLD IS PUTING THEIR ENEGY INTO FINDIN GTHIS CHILD AND ALL YOU CAN DO IS MUCK ABOUT. MADDIE IS THE ONE THAT IS MISSING THINK OF WHAT SHE IS GOING THROUGH. AND THINK THAT, THAT COULD BE ANY ONE OF OUR CHILD. HAVE A HEART YOU PEOPLE. I PRAY FOR YOU EVERDAY MCCANN MAY GOD GAVE YOU THE FATE AND STRENGHT. MADDIE WILL BE HOME SOON.
THE SMITH IN BARBADOS
November 19th, 2007 at 11:43 pm
Surely we should just hope this little child is found safe and sound and that she’s not completely bonkers by what’s happened to her. For goodness sake, it could happen to any parent, turn your back for a moment and they’re gone. Surely you lot could expend your energy on trying to help rather than throwing insults and accusations. I am so dissapointed in you.
November 18th, 2007 at 6:29 am
You people are crazy! Heaven help these parents (AND ALL OF US) if you represent society. I pray that they find out what happened to their daughter.
Holy crap.
November 4th, 2007 at 5:55 pm
1359 star
Apparently she looks very different in that picture because she was wearing make-up and dressing up clothes
November 3rd, 2007 at 11:45 pm
1358
Hideki Says:
“The interviews amply show that neither Kate or Gerry can express normal emotions concerning their children — or any emotions at all”
It shows nothing of the sort, it used to be called a stiff upper lip, perhaps they prefer to do their weeping and wailing in private, rather than go on TV and do it.
You just want them to behave according to your rules - where is the guidebook that denotes how parents of abducted children should behave to your satisfaction ?
Idiot
November 2nd, 2007 at 2:54 pm
the pic they have posted with this does not even look like Madeleine. I mean i dont know her personally, BUT they have posted alot of pics of her and for some reason, this one doesnt look like it goes with the rest….
November 1st, 2007 at 6:52 am
1357
DNAMAN Says:
“You seem quite obsessed with Kate McCann being a swinger and even maybe having something to do with being a peadophile - all of which has come from your imagination - which clearly speaks volumes about the state of your mind.”
No, I’d say that the idea of me being obsessed has come from YOUR imagination, and speaks volumes about YOUR mind.
I’ve never even discussed the “swinger” aspect because I know nothing about those inuendoes. I’d be glad to discuss it, if you’d like to point out some sources of information.
As for the pedophilia angle, speculation about that cannot be avoided, especially in view of the accusations once levelled at Murat, who is apparently associated with the McCanns, directly or indirectly.
Indeed, it is Team McCann itself that has presented the theory that a pedophilia network is responsbile for abducting Madeleine, who is now in Morocco, etc etc.
Why, in your opinion, are the McCanns OBSESSED WITH PEDOPHILIA?
The interviews amply show that neither Kate or Gerry can express normal emotions concerning their children — or any emotions at all. Even when Kate knew what she’d be asked and could plan her answers well in advance, she STILL thought that saying “6 months is a long time for me to be without Madeleine” would elicit sympathy! In describing her own emotional state, she STILL thought it was appropriate to say that she is now “not as happy as before”.
There is NOTHING about Madeleine in the “About Madeleine” section of their webpage. They have NEVER talked in any detail about Madeleine, and they only showed TWO recent pictures of her, even though supposedly they were desperate to have the public be able to recognize her. They cannot explain why in the photos they did provide, Madeleine is wearing cosmetics (liptstick, eye shadow, blush, eye liner, eye lash enhancing, etc), making the photos even less useful for identification.
Didn’t they have a whole bunch of normal recent photos, some close-ups, that would be useful for identification? Don’t they have any videoes of Madeleine doing something simple and normal, like kicking a ball around for example?
The McCanns’ extreme narcissism and their obvious regard for children as nothing but objects for their own pleasure does not bode well when it comes to the question of whether or not they themselves are connected with a pedophilia network.
October 31st, 2007 at 3:14 pm
Hideki Says
You suspect posters are underage. I see. That explains your perspective on pedophilia very well.
Does it ? - I see you haven’t offered an explaination though.
As for perspective, you should try and get some, unfortunately they don’t sell it at Netto, so you’re S.O.L. there
You see I do happen to have some perspective, which is why I’m not posting some completely unsubstantiated tripe on the Internet.
You seem quite obsessed with Kate McCann being a swinger and even maybe having something to do with being a peadophile - all of which has come from your imagination - which clearly speaks volumes about the state of your mind.
October 31st, 2007 at 9:40 am
1355
DNAMAN Says:
“I only asked who gave you persmission as I suspected you must still be at an age where you have to put your hand up to ask permission to go to the toilet.”
You suspect posters are underage. I see. That explains your perspective on pedophilia very well.
October 31st, 2007 at 8:31 am
“I guess in your life you need permission for all your decsions? That explains your inability to write a meaningful post. However, you might make a good Team McCann member, if you are not already one. Good luck.”
Haha - a meaningful post ? - this from a numpty that suspects peadophillia, swinging and recreational drugs are involved based on no evidence whatsoever.
I feel sorry for your braincell, it must be dying of boredom.
I only asked who gave you persmission as I suspected you must still be at an age where you have to put your hand up to ask permission to go to the toilet.
October 30th, 2007 at 4:06 pm
1353
DNAMAN Says:
“HAVE YOU INFORMED SCOTLAND YARD THAT YOU ARE AVAILABLE ? ”
No need to do so. Being good detectives, they are reading this. Doh.
“WHAT MADE YOU “DECIDE”…”
I explained that. You apparently have a reading comprehension problem. Good luck with solving that, before you move on to writing skills.
“AND MORE IMPORTANLY, WHO GAVE YOU ANY PERMISSION TO “DECIDE” ANYTHING ?…”
I guess in your life you need permission for all your decsions? That explains your inability to write a meaningful post. However, you might make a good Team McCann member, if you are not already one. Good luck.
October 30th, 2007 at 2:49 pm
Well then, I think you have good intuition. Although I immediately sensed that there was child abuse involved, I only suspected parental violence such as smacking the kid around, sedating her to keep her quiet, etc.
I have only recently decided that the paedophilia angle of speculation is quite warranted.
HAVE YOU INFORMED SCOTLAND YARD THAT YOU ARE AVAILABLE ? I FIND IT REFRESHING THAT YOU ARE ABLE TO GET INSIGHT INTO A CHILD BEING SMACKED AROUND BASED ON NO KNOWLEDGE WHATSOEVER, SO NOT ONLY MUST YOU BE A GREAT DETECTIVE, BUT MUST ALSO BE IN POSSESION OF SUPERNATURAL POWERS.
WHAT MADE YOU “DECIDE” AND MORE IMPORTANLY, WHO GAVE YOU ANY PERMISSION TO “DECIDE” ANYTHING ?
October 30th, 2007 at 2:43 pm
“Intuitively, I thought this was a paedophile case from day one and have alluded to it loads of times in my posts way back. ”
INTUITIVELY - reading your ridiculous posts I’d say you’re parents were closely related
October 30th, 2007 at 1:35 pm
I hope that when all is over and the McCanns are cleared,and they will be . The people who have made the must ludicrous and inflammable statements about them. (This is without knowing them, or anything about them apart from what they see in the media.) Will have the grace to apologise. But, No they won’t, they will slink back into their holes to look for their next victim, and then proceed to make a tragic situation ,unbearable again. Yes I do know them and I know how much your vile comments have added to their distress. You may not like them or believe them but that does not give you the right to judge them. I am sorry but accusing them of being involved in Paedophilia using their own child, has caused me to break my silence. What sewers of minds you have. Have you wandered why there is not more written defending them? It is because people who know them , respect them too much to join in the “Soap Opera” scenario that people like you have created. I feel so sorry for you , obviously you have very little in your lives that you have become so obsessed with making up stories about people you don’t know. Strikes me as something out of the french revolution-knitting while heads rolled.
October 30th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
Hello everyone, Hideki -
Have been otherwise occupied for a few days.
The last posts I wrote were I how I wished they were innocent and I felt really peace with the situation.
Today I come and read this bullshit and I am back in an absolute rage.
So maybe I should just be an ostrich and dig my head in the sand and forget about it all, but for some reason life gets me back online to read this.
It lacks such credibility and must be such a crushing blow to their reputation.
Surely even the most stupid people can see the sham that this has become.
The experiment moves into the next phase:
How many insults must a nation hurl at another before there is war?
How many lies can we tell?
What can we plunder and soil in the name of power.
They can now monitor and see how the subjects deal with their anger and aggravation, do they network and gripe or do they do Michael Moore kind of things. In order words are they moved to action apart from verbal opinions on forums.
If the controllers of this experiment find out it is that easy to lie to us, to insult us, and get away with it again and again, then we as a species are truly doomed.
Maybe this situation just needs to get so totally absurd that the charade that it is is revealed once and for all and something new can come into being.
I often wonder if we could ever get organised into a really intelligent factor. I read so much on the web that is absolutely brilliant and I think if we could tap into an information centre where we could immediately punish our governments for not adhering to our desires for justice and transparency.
I fear we are already too controlled to ever be a risk to the powers that be.
I think this whole McCann thing has been a fabrication to see just how much we can take,
and you know the sad thing it is endless.
We will keep getting outraged.
Then Hopeful.
Then outraged.
And all the time the insults grow bigger.
I NEEEEEEDDD TO SCCCREAAAAAM
October 30th, 2007 at 12:49 pm
WILL THERE BE A HAPPY ENDING TO THE MCCANN SAGA?
OR WILL KATE NEXT YEAR BE EVEN LESS HAPPY THAN THIS:
“I’M NOT AS HAPPY NOW AS I WAS WHEN I WAS FREE AND MADELEINE WAS ABDUCTED” SAID KATE, INTERVIEWED IN HER JAIL CELL.
1341
m.e. Says:
1336 Hideki
“Intuitively, I thought this was a paedophile case from day one and have alluded to it loads of times in my posts way back. ”
Well then, I think you have good intuition. Although I immediately sensed that there was child abuse involved, I only suspected parental violence such as smacking the kid around, sedating her to keep her quiet, etc.
I have only recently decided that the paedophilia angle of speculation is quite warranted. Perhaps the “last straw” for me was watching the McCanns in their Spain interview. They had plenty of time to prepare for it, and yet it made them look like monsters. This is a mother who actually thought that saying stuff like “6 months is a long time for me to be without Madeleine” would sound natural and elicit sympathy. They are NOT worried about any horrible suffering Madeleine might be going through because
1) she is dead and they know it — and besides,
2) she already went through the horrible suffering at their hands
(both mere personal speculations or impressions, of course)
Look at the photos I linked previously, as well as this one
http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/madeleine.thumbnail.jpg
at the top of this thread.
The girl is being decked out for the photos. From the “abduction” viewpoint, the eye shadow and other make-up renders the photos virtually useless for identification. They only would be useful (so the McCanns apparently think) as PR — since she is so “cute” and “adorable”. I’m really surprised no one has pointed out how utterly disgusting these photos are — and that apparently the McCanns DID NOT TAKE ANY NORMAL PHOTOS OF MADELEINE. The only “normal” ones are very old photos — probably the other more recent ones would have “raised eyebrows” to say the least.
m.e. wrote: “Everything since has only confirmed this suspicion although it still might be wrong. Lots of people have referred more to ’swinging’ and recreational drugs and indeed they may be involved but there are unfortunately several indicators that seriously point to paedophilia. But no concrete proof yet and they may be coincidences. ”
The paedophilia activity and the recreational drugs and “swinging” areof course not mutually exclusive. Quite possibly the McCanns were involved in all of this.
Remember the “gooseberry” mother of one Tapas9 couple at first testified they each only checked on their own kids — not on all kids. At first I thought she was the one telling the truth, but what I think happened was the Tapas9 decided to lie and not tell the police all the kids were together. This woman was following that line when she said each checked on their own. (and/or she did not want her children involved with the scandal).
But Team McCann concocted the idea that each checked on all children by “making the rounds” — in their attempt to mitigate the child neglect aspect. Unfortunately their ridiculous story made no sense, filled with contradiction, and was not backed up by witnesses. Then it turns out that the children are ALL at the McCanns’ apartment — so they actually did not even need to lie about “making the rounds”. Why did they conceal the fact that the children were all together?
That is another “final straw”. At this point, you have to assume they would lie about anything, even about the children being alone and the door unlocked.
Let’s hope the McCanns are brought to justice, put in jail where they belong for child neglect and obstruction of justice, and made to pay back ALL the money that was donated — perhaps to a legitimate charity.
October 30th, 2007 at 10:06 am
m.e.
Does your intuition tetll you anything as to why the McCanns, a couple who claim their child was stalked and then napped to order by paedo (as you yourself believe the case to be), have frequently exploited their remaining 2 children in their massive Madeleine marketing campaign? Why has Mitchell, someone supposedly with a lot of power within UK media NOT requested news agencies not show the twins? And why haven’t any of their PR staff suggested to them that it’s not a good idea to have the twins with them in the many many photo ops they or their PR have set up?
October 30th, 2007 at 10:00 am
I thought this was interesting from Nancy Grace’s show. It is something most of have already known but thought it of value because it is coming from an unbiased source and someone wo is staying at the MW resort in the villa next to the one the McCanns’ leased.
The other interesting aspect of this news is that I find it incredubly strange that an American news organisation got access to the MW PdL resort and even interviewed guests on October 8th, 07 but the British programme which aired last week claimed they could not? MW is a British company isn’t it? Why would they have refused UK reporters but allowed of all news agencies an American outfit?
TUCHMAN (GARY TUCHMAN, CNN CORRESPONDENT) : The restaurant is located within the resort. Michael (ph) and Susan Cooper (ph) are now renting the unit right next door to where the McCanns stayed. The Coopers don’t know the McCanns but let us out on their balcony to see that the tapas bar is within eyesight of the apartment. But…
(on camera): If someone was crying inside this apartment, would you hear them at the restaurant?
MICHAEL COOPER, (GUEST STAYING AT RESORT): No.
This made me wonder about the McCanns’ constant reference to how eating at the tapas bar was like having dinner in their own garden? Yet they are not wealthy people who own a huge estate? So how could he have made this comment with total honesty? How can anyone believe their justifications for leaving the children without a sittter? Our own house is big and our backyard garden is quite large too and yet we can hear our child if he starts crying when we are outside on the patio or even at the far end of the garden and he’s asleep in his room.
Now why would they make up this fabrication if they had nothing to hide? It was also reported and proved by camera that the McCann patio door was NOT visable from the tapas restaurant. Again, why would they make up these “little” lies if there were not much bigger ones looming?
October 30th, 2007 at 9:42 am
343 - Thea
A lot of thanks, also!
October 30th, 2007 at 9:34 am
For Harry Hindsight:
Diario de Noticias - Quarta, 10 de Outubro de 2007 - PAULA MARTINHEIRA JOSÉ MANUEL OLIVEIRA
PJ returned to Maddie’s bedroom for 5 hours
Inspectors reconstitute the night of May 3
Two and a half months after the English tracking dogs detected cadaver odour in the apartment of the Ocean Club resort, in Praia da Luz, where Madeleine McCann disappeared from on May 3, the Policia Judiciaria (PJ) yesterday returned to the location, in order to make a new reconstitution of what happened on that night, at a time when the investigators have no doubts left about the British child’s death and the concealment of her corpse by her parents.
The operation appears after new clues were revealed by the exhaustive DNA analysis work that has been ongoing at the Forensic Science Service in Birmingham, in the United Kingdom, which point, as the British press in general reported yesterday, to the involvement of the McCann couple in their daughter’s death.
**********Yesterday’s diligence was the third of its kind, performed by PJ since Maddie disappeared (since the early morning of May 4, until the first week of June, the apartment was sealed, at the police’s service, and was searched again by the end of July). It was made under extreme discretion and lasted 5 hours, from 7 a.m. until noon, and as DNA could discover, it was led by chief inspector Tavares de Almeida, who was number two of the team that was coordinated by Gonçalo Amaral, who was demoted last week by the Judiciaria’s national directory. The PJ continues to insist on the idea that the key to the enigma lies in the apartment. The apartment was not occupied again since the tracker dogs marked the girl’s death.**********
October 30th, 2007 at 9:19 am
Alfred Allen,
I’m not British. Although I respect and admire certain things about British culture I will not boycott Portugal and find the idea ridiculous.
If the McCanns had followed the advice of “when in Rome” and cared for their children in the Portuguese way - Madeleine would still be here. While this story is sad, the amount of resources and money this couple and the UK government have imo blackmailed the Portuguese into spending on this one investigation is disgusting and vulgar. Not to mention disrespectful not only towards the nation of Portugal but missing and exploited children of all nationalities.
My husband and I will continue to purchase Portuguese wine, jam and pottery. We are planning to travel to Portugal and Spain this coming spring and are looking forward to our holiday very much.
October 30th, 2007 at 9:08 am
For Harry Hindsight:
…..the manager of the Mark Warner resort in Portugal, John Hill, said about 60 staff and guests at the complex had searched until 0430 GMT while police notified border police, Spanish police and airports.
Officers sealed off the area of the apartment for forensic checks and extra police teams were brought in from Lisbon.
BBC News May 4th, 07: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/leicestershire/6623127.stm
October 30th, 2007 at 8:56 am
1336 Hideki
Intuitively, I thought this was a paedophile case from day one and have alluded to it loads of times in my posts way back. Everything since has only confirmed this suspicion although it still might be wrong. Lots of people have referred more to ’swinging’ and recreational drugs and indeed they may be involved but there are unfortunately several indicators that seriously point to paedophilia. But no concrete proof yet and they may be coincidences.
Yeah right…….
October 30th, 2007 at 8:52 am
For Harry Hindsight:
……..Mark Warner management denied there were signs of forced entry at the flat claiming instead that roller shutters had been slid up and the bedroom window opened.
The firm added that police were keeping an open mind over whether Maddy had managed to leave the apartment on her own.
The McCanns were said to have chosen the complex as a “family-friendly resort.”
But they declined to take advantage of a baby-sitting service which would have left their children supervised while they dined.
**********Resort manager John Hill said around 60 staff and guests had searched until 4.30am yesterday as police contacted border authorities, neighbouring Spanish officers and airports.**********
Mr Hill said: “It was a very emotional and very frantic night and everyone did a fantastic job of getting involved and trying to search the area.
“There are a criminal investigator and around 20 officers here but unfortunately there’s still no information. If I was in the McCanns’ situation, I’d be frustrated as hell. If there were 100 police here I’d want more.”
The British Embassy said it had been informed about Maddy’s disappearance.
Portuguese police said: “It’s a sensitive case. It involves a child and we cannot give more information for now.”
**********Officers sealed off the five-storey holiday block with crime scene tape and fingerprinted the shutters and window sill outside Maddy’s room. A patio to the rear of the block, believed to be attached to the family’s two-bedroom apartment, was also sealed off.**********
By late afternoon the hunt for Maddy had intensified with helicopter crews, firemen and maritime search teams involved.
A special criminal investigation team from the Policia Judiciria was travelling down from Lisbon.
Sky News weather presenter Jo Wheeler said local police had been giving out maps and telling people where to look. She said: “It’s very well organised.”
From May 5th, Sunday Mirrror Article: http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/dailynews/tm_headline=who-took-our-maddy—&method=full&objectid=19048526&siteid=89520-name_page.html
*’s are an attempt to aleret you to important information to assuage your apparent astigmatic reading.
October 30th, 2007 at 8:49 am
Ian wrote
Apparently because the PJ have been at the apartment testing scenarios, this means that they have now accepted the Mccanns instant abduction theory.
I think what it means sunshine is that the PJ are now, (for the first time since the McCanns have been made arguidos) changing direction in their enquiries.
Now lets start debating events of that evening eh?
October 30th, 2007 at 8:39 am
Apparently because the PJ have been at the apartment testing scenarios, this means that they have now accepted the Mccanns instant abduction theory.
According to the Daily Mirror. It just shows how ’spin’ is applied. It could easily have said ‘Mccanns abduction tehory tested to destruction’ could’nt it!
October 30th, 2007 at 8:31 am
I read in some shabby paper yesterday, a theory that Madeleine was being held in Morocco and working as a maid to an elderly couple.
A MAID????????????? She’s four years old for Gods sake. What does she do in her spare time? Work as the chauffer perhaps.
Jouralists involved in this case are more barking mad than Kate McCann and that’s going some.
Once my fucking Sat-Nav tells me where Rowlsey is I’ll be up there for you girl.
October 30th, 2007 at 8:21 am
WHY ARE THERE ONLY TWO RECENT PHOTOS OF MADELEINE IN THE ENTIRE “ABDUCTION” GALLERY?
TEAM MCCANN HAS NO ANSWER.
1333
barney Says:
1329
Hideki:
“I think you are off on a horrible tangent… little kids copy their mothers and play with make-up… stop going too deep into this… talking about the child’s pose’s??? OMG!!”
The eyebrows are clipped and painted perfectly. The eyelashes are also elongated by an adult. The lipstick is also applied deftly and sparingly. This is not a child playing with make-up. It is make-up applied to the child before being photographed.
Do you think this is a “tangent” ?! These are presumably the most normal photos in the possession of the McCanns. And why do you think they used photos with make-up applied for the public to identify the child? Talk about ludicrous! Apparently they have no ordinary photos of the child.
I challenge the McCanns to show us 100 photos of Madeleine, taken between January and May, 2007.
1334
barney Says:
“Madeleine doesn’t have make-up on.. the photo is over exposed!”
First you say that she is playing with make-up, and then you say she is not wearing make-up. You definitely sound like a Team McCann player!
She not only wears make-up in various photos, the eyebrows and eyelashes are meticulously done.
Now I ask you — in what sort of enterprise are children regularly dolled up to look like sexy adults? Then go on to think of what Murat was accused of early on in the case.
I would say that the McCann abduction story has people way off on a tangent. The real story is something so horrifying no one wants to talk about it. Something so disgusting that a post saying it in plain words was deleted.
Just remember why the McCanns did NOT hire a nanny for a small fee — “we did not want to leave the children with a stranger”. Maybe they did exactly what they implied… left the children with someone who was NOT a stranger.
And why do you people think the Tapas9 lied about the children being left together in one apartment, when it would have made their “checking” alibi more palatable?
Answer: if this case breaks wide open and the connection to [deleted]is exposed, these friends will no longer be friends. In fact, they will probably declare that they never really WERE friends with the McCanns.
October 30th, 2007 at 7:30 am
I haven’t totally caught up with the posts so this theory might already be out there.
But Soothsayer got me thinking post number ….way back. Anyway…
Maybe the PJ’s could well be after bigger fish. After the slandering they have taken taken who would blame them to fail to heed the word of what ever powers are really behind this fiasco to stop digging up dirt, a message passed on by George Brown perhaps?.
Maybe the PJ do have all the phone records and DNA evidence they need but are awaiting evidence from the UK which will prove that tampering has been going on by these English departments. Becoming part of the cover up. Thus exposing how far this cover up has gone /going and how deeply entrenched are the real perputrators.
The Uk authorities could be in a bind. Do they release the tampered evidence and hope the PJ’s accept it or do they sacrifice the McCanns and hope they keep mum in the sake of saving face and protecting whatever is so important to a lot of people.
Theres a myriad of theories been posted but it’s got to be bigger than we all think. IMO.
Go the PJ’s. I say.
October 30th, 2007 at 6:49 am
Madeleine doesn’t have make-up on.. the photo is over exposed!
October 30th, 2007 at 6:47 am
1329
Hideki:
I think you are off on a horrible tangent… little kids copy their mothers and play with make-up… stop going too deep into this… talking about the child’s pose’s??? OMG!!