Anorak

Anorak | Is sex with a robot adultery?

Is sex with a robot adultery?

by | 26th, February 2012

IS having sex with a sex robot adultery? As David Levy reported:

Upmarket sex dolls were introduced to the Korean public at the Sexpo exposition in Seoul in August 2005, and were immediately seen as a possible antidote to Korea’s Special Law on Prostitution that had been placed on the statute books the previous year. Before long, hotels in Korea were hiring out “doll experience rooms” for around 25,000 won per hour ($25)…. This initiative quickly became so successful at plugging the gap created by the antiprostituion law that, before long, establishments were opening up that were dedicated solely to the use of sex dolls… These hotels assumed, quite reasonably, that there was no question of them running foul of the law, since their dolls were not human. But the Korean police were not so sure. The news website Chosun.com… reported, in October 2006, that the police in Gyeonggi Province were “looking into whether these businesses violate the law . . . Since the sex acts are occurring with a doll and not a human being, it is unclear whether the Special Law on Prostitution applies.”

Josh Rothman muses:o

It seems inevitable, [David] Levy writes, that more advanced “sexbots” will push this issue even more to the fore, forcing lawmakers to figure out just which aspects of prostitution they want to outlaw. Levy’s sexbot example is emblematic of a theme running through this collection of essays [Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics]: The ethical problems posed by robots aren’t just about the robots. They’re also about old, familiar human behaviors which we must reconsider once robots are introduced. How will spouses feel, Levy asks, about the use of sexbots? Some will see it as adultery, others as a intrinsically meaningless.

Some see sex with other women as intrinsically meaningless. You just need an amoral standpoint…



Posted: 26th, February 2012 | In: Technology Comment (1) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink