Madeleine McCann: Michaela Walczuch’s Alibi, Metodo 3 Warned And Three-Year-Old Carolina Santos
MADDY WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
THE SUN page 21: “CASE CLOSED – Portuguese cops to quit on Maddie as suspect’s girlfriend linked to case”
“BAFFLED Portuguese police [surely, “bungling”] are set to CLOSE the Madeleine McCann investigation - despite startling new evidence emerging”
A police source tells Portuguese newspaper 24 Hors: “We are practically back where we started. The parents are still the prime suspects in hiding their daughter’s body - not of her death, which was probably accidental. But there is no firm proof”
And of the McCanns – the “Leicestershire doctors Kate and Gerry, both 39” - and Robert Murat? Suspects forever…
But never fear “the private detectives hired by her frustrated parents Kate and Gerry are working on sensational new leads that suggest she could be alive”
DAILY MIRROR page 15: “I HAVE AN ALIBI – Murat’s girl ‘in church’ when Maddy abducted”
Madeleine McCann goes missing and at the same moment Michaela Walczuch “was four miles from the family villa with Jehovah’s Witnesses”
Says a friend of hers: “She was at a church meeting in Lagos on the night. She told police this when questioned and they confirmed her story”
Says Clarence Mitchell: “Everything Metodo 3 does is within the law” – and on the meter?
DAILY EXPRESS front page: “MADELEINE – McCANNS ATE STILL THE MAIN SUSPECTS – Police ‘have closed case’”
Says a source to 24 Horas: ““Detectives are getting ready to pack their bags. Given the current state of the investigation, police chiefs are considering demobilising the team sent specifically to investigate the case and are even planning on moving Paulo Rebelo, the head of the investigation, onto tasks of greater responsibility”
A family friend of the McCanns says: “The worst thing that could happen is for the case to close and Gerry and Kate to remain official suspects” – That’s the worst thing?
Page 9: “Alibi will prove me innocent” - Ms Walczuch said she had an alibi that proves she is “absolutely not involved” in Madeleine’s disappearance
Says the Express: “Walczuch lives five miles from Praia da Luz in Lagos with her estranged husband Portuguese husband pool-cleaner Luis Antonio, 47, and their eight year-old daughter. She set up a property business called Romigen with Murat. In a bizarre living arrangement Murat lived at the flat for six months to conduct an affair with Walczuch while Antonio was still there”
So was she in Silves, where the Portuguese truck driver says he saw her hand over a child?
The “WORLD’S GREATEST NEWSPAPER” reports: “Silves was the scene of the attempted child abduction last year. Three-year-old Carolina Santos, who is blonde with blue eyes, was found being led away from the family cafe near the town of Silves by a man last year… Father Abel Santos, 40, said: ‘We were busy working in the kitchen and came out to find out she wasn’t there. ‘I searched around for her and saw her some way away on the road with a man I took to be Moroccan. We started towards them shouting and Carolina stopped and turned towards us. He disappeared around the bend.’ His wife Lina, 28, added: ‘It was very strange because Carolina is very shy and doesn’t go with strangers. When I asked her what happened she said he told her that he had another little girl for her to play with’” – Was Madeleine McCann kidnapped in Portugal before she went missing?
DAILY STAR page 11: “Parents still in police sights”
“A probe by new police chief Paulo Rebelo has concluded the four-year-old’s mum Kate and dad Gerry were rightly named suspects. But there is not enough evidence to charge them, according to police sources”
“MADDIE: COPS TELL PRIVATE EYES TO BACK OFF” – “THE £2,000-a-day private eyes hired by Madeleine McCann’s parents to find her were dismissed by police last night as ‘irrelevant small fry’”
How much do the Portuguese police cost to run?
Says a police source: “The McCanns’ investigators are small fry. The information they have gathered lacks credibility. They are only in places that have already been talked about. They are going over old ground. Miss Walczuch is not a suspect. She was at a prayer meeting. This was established months ago. There are no new leads. We know when the private detectives come and what they are doing here”
A source close to the prosecutor handling the case says: “If they speak to any witness who has been named in the case, or have access to a procedural piece of evidence or a case document, they are committing a crime which could be obstruction of justice”
So the Private detectives can’t even speak with Michaela Walczuch…
DAILY MAIL page 11: “Murat lover ‘was at Jehovah’s meeting as Maddie vanished’”
“German-born Miss Walczuch” was in church when Madeleine went missing
But: “She has failed to reveal, however, where she was on May 5 and June 15, when two separate witnesses claim to have seen her with Madeleine. Mr Murat’s lawyer, Francisco Pagarete, claimed yesterday this was because her diary had been seized by the police some months ago and has not been returned”
Her estranged husband, Luis Antonio, is “a pool cleaner and gardener”
“McCANN DETECTIVES ATTACKED” – “Police launched a contemptuous attack yesterday on the private detectives working for Kate and Gerry McCann”
Police call the PIs “small fry”
DAILY TELEGRAPH page 11:” Portuguese detectives ‘ready to abandon Madeleine inquiry’”
The team of detectives led by Paulo Rebelo are “on the brink of shelving the investigation”
THE INDEPENDENT, THE TIMES and THE GUARDIAN: No Madeleine news today
Posted: 22nd, November 2007 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,011) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- susan jones on Susan Boyle Weeps As The Press Set About Destroying Her
- The Real Stig on The Great Cathay Pacific Blocked Toilet Mystery
- SoDak-GhostDog on Interview With Survior Of James Arthur Ray’s Sedona Sweat Lodge
- Katie Norman on I’m A Celebrity: Joe Bugner’s Career In Pictures
- HOTWATER on Madeleine McCann: The Media Creates A New Maddie Monster And Twists The Facts
June 6th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
Sometimes the answer is staring you in the face.
December 20th, 2007 at 11:06 pm
1009
Mandi Says:
December 3rd, 2007
re the above post i think you are right that murat has a whole lot to do with m mccann`s disappearance…please god let her be found
December 20th, 2007 at 12:14 pm
Just read some of the other comments. Yes the McCanns were wrong to leave their kids unattended, and yes there was childcare facilities available - but do you really think that Jerry and Kate thought there was any risk…do you really think that they just thought ah we’ll risk it…hopefully no one will kidnapp our kids……OF COURSE THEY DIDN’T!!!
I would just like some of you to stop and think - we all do things that, retrospectively, we realise was pretty stupid…but we are all human and make mistakes. Kate herself said that the only reason they left their kids alone was BECAUSE they felt so safe where they were staying and that if it had even crossed her mind that there was any risk then of course they would not have left them.
Think we need to give these poor people a break - they have lost their daughter after THEY left her alone - can’t even imagine how bad that must be - losing a child and blaming yourself at the same time. Instead of bitching about the McCanns I think we need to support them in any way we can
December 3rd, 2007 at 3:18 pm
I believe Robert Murat definitely kidnapped Madeline. After reveiwing some information this morning, I believe she is being hid in the UK by someone Murat knows (sister or exwife or a property he is selling possibly). Murat is a monster and a very powerful man with many connections and people are afraid of him. People around him know the truth but they aren’t talking, including Dawn and his present girfriend. Dawn is definitely being blackmailed into talking good about him, yet she walked him out on him two years ago because she seen who he really was, a peodaphile.
He has properties for sale in many areas I see from his Romigen website, and could certainly hide a child easily. As we all know he also has a secret chamber in the house he shares with his mother nearby where Maddy was taken, and lets not forget the child pornography on his computer, and the friend Sergey Malinka who is a sex offender(whom he contacted the night Maddy was taken, and who has a boat and property near Morrocco). Do you all also know he rented a car on May 12 and drove a long distance with it, where’s the forensics on that rental car? It kills me to read of all the evidence and links made to this man, and yet he walks around free along with his accomplices. I am American, and I couldn’t help but think if this happened here the people would be aressted and the little girl would have been found already. The police don’t seem to be very bright over in Portugal, lets hope they are in the UK, where she is most likely being hid. As far as I’m concerned there’s a big blinking light above his head that says “I TOOK HER”, now what are the police and detectives going to do about it? Just close the case and go on with their lives so he can do it again soon enough…………
November 28th, 2007 at 6:50 pm
2 doctors leave a child of 3 unattended, i mean its not as though they are stapped for cash that they cant pay for the service of a child care
we dont all live in a £600000 pound house
November 25th, 2007 at 12:56 pm
Although i am not under the assumption that Kate and Gerry Mccan killed Maddie, surely they are somewhat partly to blame! Who leaves a 3 year old child on her own, and other children with the accumulated age of 7!? Kate and Gerry Mccan should be prosecuted for negligence! If that were me or you who left our child on their own i believe the outcome would be prosecution and our children taken into social services. Its because of their occupational status that this incident of negligence appears to be overlooked! A child should not ever be left on his/her own! Its highly irresponsible! I do empathise with them, i really really do, if it was my daughter i would be completely devistated, but then again i would not leave her on her own. I just can’t help but think that if Maddie’s parents were there on the night she disapeared that nothing would have happened and Maddie would still be with her mummy and daddy now.
November 24th, 2007 at 5:48 pm
some of u have written some horrid stuff about a family who have just lost their child. remember that when your writing such nasty things. innocent till proven guilty rmember that to. how dare u make the mccanns out to be monsters. do u know them then??? do u know that they killed little maddie?? no u don’t so less of the bitching and leave them alone!!!!!!
November 24th, 2007 at 8:52 am
[...] Original post by Health Insurance Online Quote - Google News [...]
November 24th, 2007 at 7:05 am
[...] “German born” Michaela Walczuch, who “claims” she was at a Jehovah’s Witness meeting four miles away when the [...]
November 23rd, 2007 at 4:11 pm
Conservante de materia orgánica
http://www.complucad.com/
Pepe
November 23rd, 2007 at 10:34 am
1001 on2u Says:
998/correction
sacrifice not sacrafice….just missed 999 although I think 666 is the devil/satan #
+++++++++++++++
That’s my usual understanding…. Just thought someone posted here the other day that 999 was in some way related.
November 23rd, 2007 at 10:31 am
998/correction
sacrifice not sacrafice….just missed 999 although I think 666 is the devil/satan #
November 23rd, 2007 at 10:18 am
Eeek! Isn’t 999 in some circles considered to be the “real” sign of the devil/satan?
November 23rd, 2007 at 10:16 am
994 Matt. Says:
936…Peter O
Innocent people do not usually refuse to answer all Police questions.
+++++++++++++++++
You are absolutely correct and I’ve never doubted that the McCann’s are hiding something(s). However, just consider what it is they may be trying to ‘hide’.
As I’ve noted to Kris, they could be guilty, along with their friends, of the worlds worst attempted alibi cover up to avoid child neglect charges? Imagine they hadn’t been checking the children, all/most of the Tapas group, and that all/some of them had been sedating. Imagine they had indeed been involved in some of the more lurid ‘activities’ that some people have alleged.
If, and I know it’s seems as likely as abduction at the moment, someone(s) within the Tapas 9 actually was responsible for Madeleine’s disappearance they then have a huge ‘secret’ they need to keep. What if this person(s) then made a huge song and dance to the group about just how stuffed their lives and careers are once details of the crap child care and social activities comes out? What if this person, or someone close to them, also conveniently “claims” to have seen the alleged abductor carrying a child away earlier in the evening?
And so begins the most convoluted alibi fabrication in criminal history. What the McCann’s think they are trying to hide is their, and their friends, ‘unconventional’ social life and its consequential impact on their appalling child care arrangements. What they don’t realise is that one of their ‘friends’ has a much bigger secret they need to hide.
Everybody, or most of the group, would be bound by the need to keep their social life/activities and crap parenting a secret.
I’m not particularly wedded to this scenario, and don’t have any evidence to back it up, it’s just an alternative that may loosely fit the information we currently know about.
November 23rd, 2007 at 10:14 am
It is my belief all of you on this forum will be still writing about this case 2 years from now. Some to vent their frustrations others to inflate their ego’s .Who would otherwise never have a platform.
This feeding frenzy serves a need in a society that thrives on sensationalism.
It is unfortunate that a young innocent victim is the sacrafice.
November 23rd, 2007 at 9:48 am
HEDEKI996 BRAVO WELL SAID
November 23rd, 2007 at 8:05 am
A LOOK AT THE LOST SOULS
983
Patch Says:
“The more I read, the more I am convinced of their guilt. There is not one shred of evidence to suggest abduction and every sign that the child died before the evening of the 3rd May inside the apartment. ”
And despite there not being any evidence for abduction, the McCanns ardently and steadfastly insist that they KNOW it was an abduction. Yet the only indication of this is the changing story of Jane Tanner, who at first did not even know if it was a child that the faceless man was carrying. Now she is 100% sure it was Madeleine. What other “evidence” is there for abduction? The “forced shutters” turned out to be another McCann lie. The displaced Cuddle Cat is something suspect Kate alleges, but it does not even prove abduction. Gerry could have displaced Cuddle Cat while cleaning up the body fluids.
It’s clear that the McCanns themselves have no basis to form an abduction theory, but they went ahead and did so anyway, claiming that a pedophilia network targeted Madeleine. Why? Did one of their members have a coloboma fetish? No, this is the McCanns feverish effort to convince the public that there was an abduction. It is a complete fabrication on their part, based on absolutely nothing but their own desire to escape the legal and professional consequences. You could see that when Gerry said publicly that he hoped the paedophile abductors are “treating her like a princess”. Either he himself does not believe Team McCann’s ludicrous abduction theory, or he believes that it is possible that paedophiles can be very nice people whom he would be glad to have caring for his daughter.
“There is also every sign that they are callous liars and deceitful conniving bastards. ”
Yes, that is another way to put it. Gerry was publicly caught in a lie — he lied about visibility of the apartment from the tapas bar. He also lied about the distance, calling it 50 yards. These lies were deliberate attempts to escape the consequences of being found guilty of neglect.
What has Gerry said that is NOT a lie? That is the question.
“There is every sign that they moved their child’s body like a piece of garbage in the boot of the car and dumped it.”
For them, Madeleine’s body was no different than a piece of rotting meat that must be thrown away for it is no longer edible. They regarded her like a dirty nappy to be disposed of while holding one’s nose. These people have the dignity of grave robbers plundering the dead.
” There is clear proof that they refused to comply with the investigation and fled. ”
They are cowards for not facing up to the consequences of their own despicable behavior. However, they will find that they cannot run away from the wrath of God.
“They have clearly set up with undue haste a fund that benefits the McCann family and not used it for the purpose that donors expected. ”
An astoundingly depraved greedy resourcefulness in seeking profit from the death of their own child, which they themselves caused.
“They have trade marked their child.”
Another example of their debased morality.
“They have had friends make home movies of them and preened in front of the cameras with no thought for their daughter.”
Their daughter for them is now nothing but trademarked product. They weigh the advantages and disadvantages of selling it in this or that market.
“And I have no stomach at all to argue with the likes of Kris, Alexis, Garth, Stig, LOL, Dave S or whatever the current name is. All mindless zombies, the lot of you. ”
These people are members of the McCann family, and/or Team McCann, IMO. Probably Gerry is amongst them.
Kate and Gerry do not have the guts to just tell the truth and confess their guilt publicly, and seek the mercy of God. I feel most sorry for that priest who had to endure being used by them, and also for their twins, who will probably be delinquent drug addicts before they enter primary school.
November 23rd, 2007 at 7:36 am
986 Kris Says:
Edit…. A) Not really true; or B) A matter of perception. I agree with you that the McCanns have behaved oddly (home movie, etc), but nothing that is– to me– too terribly outside the bounds of normalcy in what is already a really weird world.
And, it appears to me there is ZERO forensic evidence against them — ie, Madeleine’s blood has NOT been proven to be in the apartment, there WAS no boot soup proven to be Madeleine-related. So, in other words, all we have against the McCanns that we can see is: They act weird, and the cadaver dogs.
Someone else today pointed out that if the McCanns and their friends were all half drunk when police arrived, it seems so completely implausible that one or the other had managed to recently (VERY recently) kill a 3-year-old and hide her body. Since we have confirmed sightings of Madeleine as late as 6:30 p.m., that leaves the McCanns all of 2 hours to perform the deed and hide the body. It’s not realistic. Edit…
+++++++++++++++++++
Kris, I really wish our different time zones didn’t preclude a more interactive conversation..
Jane Tanners sighting of the Egg Man, the alleged timing and the fact that she saw Gerry and Wilkins, but they didn’t see her, is all most odd.
Carlos Anjos on the recent Panorama program gave a very lucid explanation about the DNA. Without discussing the McCann’s case explicitly, he implied via a general discussion about DNA that you can have ‘indications’ of something but not absolute truth. (Can’t recollect now, but I think he was talking about 80% matches giving ‘indications’) The clear implication here, for me anyway, is that at the time he was speaking they didn’t have 100% matches (and they may never do) and so other evidence will be required to make a strong case.
The McCann’s don’t just act ‘weird’, they manipulate the media and ‘plant’ evidence explanations. Gerry’s almost throwaway remark on the Jon Corner “home video” that was shown on Panorama about him wondering if the twins hadn’t been sedated by the implied ‘evil predator’, to name but one example.
The ‘confirmed sightings’ of Madeleine that you mention are not in confirmed, I believe. There is much talk of the PJ being interested in a “missing six hours”. If taken in a quite literal sense as being the six hours prior to 8.30PM, that means that the PJ have queries about the period from 2.30PM on the 3rd May. Right after the time that the ‘last photo’ was allegedly taken.
I haven’t a clue what the McCann’s may be guilty of, could be anything from the worst attempt in the world to manufacture an alibi for them and their friends to avoid child neglect charges through to something much more heinous. That they know much more about the events leading up to Madeleine’s disappearance I have little doubt, in my opinion.
November 23rd, 2007 at 7:04 am
936…Peter O
Innocent people do not usually refuse to answer all Police questions.
November 23rd, 2007 at 7:00 am
929…Abraham Zapruder
Re link provided….
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=494927&in_page_id=1811&ICO=WORLD_NEWS&ICL=TOPART
Oh dear…….how reliable a paper is that…
The picture of Dr K McCann being blessed….is titled as being the Catholic Priest
giving the blessing.
It isn’t….it is Father Haynes Hubbard….Dr K’s “new” frind after she dropped the
Catholic Priest.
November 23rd, 2007 at 6:40 am
Oh dear I am catching up early in the morning and everyone is still in bed.
673 - Perry Freemason, I had the exact same thought last night that there was cloning involved.
My blood ran cold, because it would explain so very much.
Well, well, well.
That is why the DNA tests have taken so long -
774 Judith C - I agree. I would like to be more proactive and get some huge ball rolling.
I am willing if someone sets direction. Let us go for it.
November 23rd, 2007 at 6:15 am
Kiwi - 990 Perhaps that is what happened. Perhaps Maddie woke up and fell down the back steps. Perhaps she and the other kids played and chased each other and she fell out of the window. The doors were unlocked so she may have walked off and been picked up by a passing person wanting a child.
The other kids have not said anything that we know about have they. Two year olds can talk though.
November 23rd, 2007 at 6:04 am
The parents didn’t kill Madeleine, they sedated her and her siblings so that explains why there was no fuss and bother when the abductor walked in and took her during one of the long periods that there was no-one there. They apparently did that on a regular basis so that they could enjoy their evenings uninterrupted. The abductor killed her when all the noise was raised about the eye blemish and he / she / they, dumped her like a hot potato. She will be found eventually, at least her body will.
November 23rd, 2007 at 4:21 am
Oh, my late-night Madeleine thing has to stop. I should come here during the day when there’s actually someone here to talk to!!
Goodnight!!
November 23rd, 2007 at 4:21 am
And I think we give way, way too much energy to the Pedos in the USA, Susan. I am soooo sick of the paranoia over pedophiles. NOT to say it isn’t a real problem, but holy crap– it’s out of control. My sister had fits the other day because I sent out some e-mail photo of my 3-year-old playing naked in the mud one day after it rained… I mean, the little girl was covered head to toe in a mud bodysuit. But my sister was worried the pedos would get ahold of the photos, or that I could somehow be prosecuted for distributing child pornography. Stupid. Once we start letting the fear of pedophilia turn our own minds so that something wonderful, joyful and innocent becomes something weird and warped, it’s gone too far. Then the pedophiles win.
November 23rd, 2007 at 4:15 am
Plus Patch, let us think about this….So the more you read, the more you think they are guilty. That’s fine. The more I read (and I read a LOT) the more I think they are innocent despite the appearance of being guilty. I read the translations of the Portugese stories. I read the Brit stories. I read fluent French and (sort of) Spanish and read a lot of those. I read psychic websites and this one (daily) and several others. I watch all the videos. I follow links posted here from the so-called anti-McCanns. I’m not stupid, and it’s not like my opinions are based on gut feeling… My gut feeling from day 1 was that the parents are GUILTY as all heck. My thought after 3-4 months of (foolish) obsession is that they are not, in fact, guilty. That’s not to say I think it’s impossible… it’s entirely possible they are. They certainly appear to me. It’s just that, based on the evidence before us now, I do not think they are. You think they are guilty. That’s fine, too.
November 23rd, 2007 at 4:09 am
Well, that’s fine, you can believe blindly what you want without bothering to even read what others have to say, but that won’t leave you very smart in the big picture if you take that approach in the rest of your life. It’s good to read opposing viewpoints and think about them, you know. (And frankly, Dave S and certain others don’t really count– they are here to play games, not to discuss anything about Madeleine). But the thing is, most of the evidence you cite against them is either: A) Not really true; or B) A matter of perception. I agree with you that the McCanns have behaved oddly (home movie, etc), but nothing that is– to me– too terribly outside the bounds of normalcy in what is already a really weird world. And, it appears to me there is ZERO forensic evidence against them — ie, Madeleine’s blood has NOT been proven to be in the apartment, there WAS no boot soup proven to be Madeleine-related. So, in other words, all we have against the McCanns that we can see is: They act weird, and the cadaver dogs. That’s not enough to convince me, given the rest of the story. Someone else today pointed out that if the McCanns and their friends were all half drunk when police arrived, it seems so completely implausible that one or the other had managed to recently (VERY recently) kill a 3-year-old and hide her body. Since we have confirmed sightings of Madeleine as late as 6:30 p.m., that leaves the McCanns all of 2 hours to perform the deed and hide the body. It’s not realistic. Plus, if they are guilty, they really are excellenct actors, worth of an Oscar– I mean, WHY keep going with this crazy charade? Anyone else would want to let the case die out , get OUT of the public eye, if they were guilty. The McCanns keep putting themselves there, despite it becoming increasingly obvious that the more they talk, the more we think they are guilty. None of this makes sense to me.
I’m still very interested in the Third Way Theory, or something along those lines. It is the ONLY thing that starts to make sense.
November 23rd, 2007 at 4:05 am
Madeleine was abducted, but, for arguments sake, lets just say for those of you that believe she was killed by her parents, what if…….just what if there is the slightest chance your wrong. What if she is out there? If you buy into the Mccanns killing beasty parents story the hunt for her will stop. The kidnapper will have won and every pedo out there who is watching this case will secretly smile an evil smile. thinking, well, they should not have left her alone. Every child, is not fair game to these people. If it were a child you knew, would you not want the world looking for her?
We have a lifetime to persecute the Mccanns, I would rather logically look for the little angel every where I could and when all is exhausted and proof comes out eventually that she was abducted, at least I know that even against all odds I supported people who were going through hell instead of just making it worse for them.
The Pedos need a clear strong message here, even if for arguments sake she was not abducted, lets keep the message out there that this is clearly a possible case of abduction and it is horrible and evil.
Little Madeleine is out there, may angels watch over her and love her with every passing day. May the truth be known soon.
Susan USA
November 23rd, 2007 at 3:44 am
The more I read, the more I am convinced of their guilt. There is not one shred of evidence to suggest abduction and every sign that the child died before the evening of the 3rd May inside the apartment. There is also every sign that they are callous liars and deceitful conniving bastards. There is every sign that they moved their child’s body like a piece of garbage in the boot of the car and dumped it. Their is clear proof that they refused to comply with the investigation and fled. They have clearly set up with undue haste a fund that benefits the McCann family and not used it for the purpose that donors expected. They have trade marked their child. They have had friends make home movies of them and preened in front of the cameras with no thought for their daughter. All a smokescreen. Just to make them beyond the law.
And I have no stomach at all to argue with the likes of Kris, Alexis, Garth, Stig, LOL, Dave S or whatever the current name is. All mindless zombies, the lot of you. I’ll keep sending letters, whether or not they’re ignored. I will continue to do what I can. Because I have to live with myself and I don’t know how you nasty lot live with yourselves, with your campaign of bullying and insults. Perhaps you are like the people you purport to support but you don’t have their friends or influence. I seldom read the Pro McCann remarks as they are mostly illiterate tirades of abuse. Sad that the country is inhabited with lowlifes unable to think for themselves.
And on that note, Goodnight.
November 23rd, 2007 at 3:35 am
What’s clear to me, though: If they did it, they are going to get away with it. Don’t you think? I mean, unless something crazy happens, like finding a body , which doesn’t seem likely.
November 23rd, 2007 at 3:29 am
Heck, sometimes I don’t sleep well , worrying about what the best Kindergarten will be for my 4-year-old who starts school next year.