Madeleine McCann: Robert Murat Sees His Daughter
MADDYWATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
DAILY MAIL: “Madeleine suspect Robert Murat back in Britain to see his five-year-old daughter”
It is understood Mr Murat had not seen five-year-old Sofia since being named an official suspect in the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann almost a year ago.
Hunting Madeleine McCann And Robert Murat
Two weeks ago he informed police he wanted to visit the UK and see Sofia - and was allowed to do so. The fact that Portuguese authorities did not stand in his way suggests there is no evidence against Mr Murat.
Was it ever suggested by police that there was evidence against the “creepy” “oddball”? The man whose “alibi was blown“. Or was it the tabloid press making the suggestions and the police taking note?
Says Mrs Murat: “All he wanted to do was help the McCanns.”
Madeleine McCann: Robert Murat’s trial buy media
Posted: 3rd, April 2008 | In: Madeleine McCann Comments (1,222) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- Anorak on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- June on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
- eggman on Madeleine McCann: Kevin Halligen Becomes The ‘Maddie Faudster’
- Trismegistus on Madeleine McCann: Kevin Halligen Becomes The ‘Maddie Faudster’
- Bernie Morgan on Peter Andre ‘Begs’ Katie Price To Come Home
April 7th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
if you live by the sword, you die by the sword.
April 4th, 2008 at 8:05 am
Administrator: There is little to say, other than I have this morning blocked all access points for Karen, RedRooster and Ciara.
You have, between you, caused me to blink. That, in itself, is a grave mistake. It means I have seen you.
If you continue to act as spoiled petulant children, we will continue to treat you as such. Your joint conduct last night was shameful and each one of your masturbatory viewpoints was an utter disgrace in a thread in which the contributors deign to say they have concern for a missing child.
You shame Anorak, you shame other contributors and, above all, you soil your own underclothing as you desperately fumble for another thrilling, nerve-trembling, insult.
At least clean up and make some sort of half-hearted attempt to remove the foetid stench before we allow your return.
Last night was a low point for all of us forced to watch it. I will not clean up the mess but I will stop you vomiting over the site until you feel better. -agw
April 4th, 2008 at 6:14 am
Goodnight, VQ
(just gone 6 o’clock in the morning here)
April 4th, 2008 at 6:02 am
Good night Karen and Duncan or is it morning?
April 4th, 2008 at 5:59 am
1217 Karen
Don’t be too sad. It’s easy to get sucked in. I’ve made some regrettable posts.
Just remember that you have the choice to hit the submit comment button.
One of my favorite sayings is “discretion is the better part of valor.”
Take the high road.
Not that I alwas do so.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:53 am
VQ
True.
I will. 
April 4th, 2008 at 5:51 am
1213 Karen
I would have ignored him - but before Ciara got mad at about the Gandolf mistake I made - I really liked her - and so was kind of hoping at some point we could get over that misunderstanding. But where she goes, RR goes…
But, lesson learnt and all that.
—
Karen, I think you are a real authentic person, but don’t get wrapped up in these virtual identities. You cannot be sure that Ciara, Gandolf, RR are real. Some are, some are not. There is no accountability. Put a little buffer between yourself and them. You can control whether or not to respond.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:49 am
VQ
I will. Thanks.
He is quite deceptive - he always starts off being friendly and then I think it’s all ok and he likes me really and then
McFool.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:46 am
1212 Karen
He has been at this a long time with lots of identities.
Be your authentic self and don’t waste time trying to beat him at his own game.
You can choose not to respond.
It really works.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:46 am
VQ
I would have ignored him - but before Ciara got mad at about the Gandolf mistake I made - I really liked her - and so was kind of hoping at some point we could get over that misunderstanding. But where she goes, RR goes…
But, lesson learnt and all that.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:43 am
DuncanR
I know - but he wasn’t giving up. So, I thought rather than trying to be rational I’ll just do what he does and see if he likes it. I thought maybe he would think it was a bit much to only do the
thing, and then we could post on the topic again.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:42 am
Probably stupid to jump into this interchange. I wasn’t around today to track to insults, but skimming tonight I see that it got ugly. RR can bit a bit of an instigator. And he has other identities. I had one interchange with that rooster and never responded after that.
Karen, if you don’t get banned forever, I would ask that you remember that you do not have to respond. It’s really pretty simple. Don’t get caught up in it.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:39 am
Karen
Just remember the old adage -
‘Sticks an’ stanes may brak ma banes but …..’
April 4th, 2008 at 5:36 am
DuncanR
Ok, I will. But I was only hoping RR would stop constantly attacking me - when it was all an accident - if I showed him how relentless he could be.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:33 am
next week, that is
April 4th, 2008 at 5:32 am
1203 - Karen
Some folk reading through your earlier posts on this thread might call you a petulant spoilt little child. The insults you have thrown around contributed nothing to the debate about a missing wee girl and are unworthy of someone claiming to be an undergraduate student. Your behaviour earlier was more akin to that one might expect to see in a kindergarten.
I suggest you do exactly what you repeatedly claim you are about to do - take some time out. Cool down. Return to Anorak when you are ready to discuss arguments rather than attack other posters.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:32 am
Is the early shift coming on board?
Woud like to see some developments on Friday as weekends tend to be slow.
But next should be better than average.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:22 am
DuncanR
SC46 apparently stands for Simon Cowell, 46 (or someone joked that it did).
April 4th, 2008 at 5:19 am
DuncanR
Also - with the RR thing - I was only mimicking his style - since he wouldn’t accept an apology.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:17 am
DuncanR
It was a pun because SC46 kept calling me a trout when I wasn’t around.
April 4th, 2008 at 5:14 am
Finished.
I think I might go to bed??? And I am determined to give up the posting starting tomorrow. 
(and post 1126 was pure emotional blackmail - so I’m not sorry for that either).
April 4th, 2008 at 5:14 am
1200 - Karen
+++++++++++++++++++++++
You are becoming tiresome.
What exactly was the point of that remark?
Haven’t you posted enough derogatory comments about other posters?
April 4th, 2008 at 4:58 am
And SC46 turned out to be a sneaky snide cowell.
April 4th, 2008 at 4:49 am
VQ
No.
I’m still lurking about because I’ve got work to do (and I’m out at 9.30 - so there’s not that much point trying to sleep - it makes getting up worse - Starbucks tomorrow!!!
).
April 4th, 2008 at 4:38 am
Any developments?
April 4th, 2008 at 3:23 am
Lord, I wiped my details off the site and they came back on their own!!!
This resolution hasn’t lasted long - but since I was wasting time while finishing some work, I went scrolling back to see if I really was that unjustified… I wasn’t about RR (I’m never apologising to him - never!!!
)… but it seems I did miss a post where Ciara called a truce because I was too miffed that I was being accused of making a joke about a car crash.
So, this is a proper apology - to Ciara. Sorry.
April 4th, 2008 at 2:42 am
Val
I’m sorry Mods and Admin.
But I really should give Anorak up - I keep saying this, I’ve made more retirement posts than Cher’s had retirement concerts - but RR is way more than I can cope with. He’s worse than a ned
In fact to even compare him to a ned is unfair on neds. 
So, farewell and c’est la vie (I’ll probably sneak back under another name - but no personal information - ever, ever again - fingers crossed.
).
Night. x
April 4th, 2008 at 2:40 am
Val:
“Wasn”t Henderson from the British Embassy in Portugal who was replaced because
of his comments about the McCanns?”
I never heard that emphasis…….thought he voluntarily resigned….mysteriously ????
“Havn”t heard of Buck.”
He was our ambassador. Based in Lisbon and also on the scene early.
On 3 a”s and Sky they have posters “in the know” and there is no one on Anorak is
there, all we post from are Newspapaper reports, say no more.!!!!…….
This is really annoying me now…I would quite like to ‘move’….I couldn’t possibly read any more than one blog. Don’t much like the format of 3 A’s and really haven’t spent any time anywhere else….but it might be more fun somewhere else for the big news and speculations coming…..posters in the ‘know’ will probably get leaks…and on here will get nothing
April 4th, 2008 at 2:34 am
1192 Karen
I”m chatty too, and like to know who I”m “Talking “to…. as Iv”e said before, this is the
first time I”ve joined a forum and find it all surreal, but it”s nice when everyone is
interacting and I thoroughtly enjoy the session . I love jokes and Just_Me and Julie
are on my Group list for sending jokes and visual stuff, so if you want to be included,
ask Just_Me for my e-mail address.
I think we are the only ones here, so I will say Goodnight and hope to see you posting
tomorrow, after eating humble pie with Mods and Admin……..why dont” you apologise
while this thread is still going so it”s there when Carmen delivers it.
April 4th, 2008 at 2:31 am
Karen:
).”
“not a good strategy, all in
Glad you can see that then :-)………….
Can’t really add much to what has been said here this evening by Jass, Fair et al on the political side of things. I definitely think it is an aspect which you should not ignore in your looking at the Press and at PR cover-up as there would appear to be a strong link to both [imo]………I don’t believe [in this case], that it is the Press leading Gov….but the other way round……….and of course Clarie was New Labour Media-watch researcher for Tony Blair…….and was almost certainly seconded by Gordie unto this case…..why ? Not to mention Sheree Dodd and Justine McGuiness as well ???????
April 4th, 2008 at 2:16 am
Val
I’m naturally chatty - and I think because I never give out my email or phone number or address - it doesn’t really matter if I tell the truth (or tell anecdotes - some of which are probably Urban myths, but since I’ve heard them talked about as if they were true - I think, why not, put it into the mix).
But it’s getting a bit harassing. I just wish someone in real life would talk about Madeleine - or I wish I could lose interest in the case. Talking about Hollyoaks on Digital Spy was so much nicer!!!!