
Our Madeleine McCann: Colin Stagg, Mad Dogs And Lucy Cavendish, And Amaral’s True Lies
MADDIE WATCH - Anorak’s at-a-glance guide to press coverage of Madeleine McCann
SUNDAY PEOPLE: “We’ll savage bungling cops on Oprah [Winfrey] show - CLEARED McCANNS VOW TV ONSLAUGHT”
Cleared?
“At noon tomorrow a judge will formally lift the cloud of suspicion.”
Is that a fact?
The couple are likely to focus their fury on top cop Goncalo Amaral, who was kicked off the Madeleine case last October following allegations of incompetence and attacks on his British police counterparts.
“I’LL NEVER HAVE MY LIFE BACK – MURAT” - ‘I don’t know if I will ever be able to shake off the stigma of being ‘that Maddie man‘.”
“People say there is no smoke without fire and there may always be some who still doubt me. I have to live with that for the rest of my life.”
Let’s play a game of word association: Colin Stagg.
He’s the one set up by those bungling UK cops. Colin Stagg was accused of murdering Rachel Nickell on Wimbledon Common. Colin Stagg is innocent.
There being no forensic evidence, they were forced to look for likely suspects, and in Colin Stagg they found a man who ideally suited the tabloid agenda. He was runtish and rat-like, and yet also into body-building. He lived on his own. He was given to wearing dodgy-looking singlets and he was a devotee of the ancient pagan religion called Wicca. He had a picture of the Cerne Abbas giant inscribed on a black-painted wall in his flat.
Someone said that they had seen him, or a man very like him, on the common on the morning of the murder - and that was enough.
SCOTLAND ON SUNDAY: “After 445 days of missing Maddie, cloud of suspicion over parents lifts”
Tomorrow Kate and Gerry McCann hope the suspicion that they played a role in her disappearance from a Portuguese beach resort will finally – and officially – be lifted.
Hope? But in The People it’s a fact?
The Portuguese authorities are believed to be ready to remove the official arguido – suspect – status from the couple and clear them of any involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance from Praia de Luz in May last year.
Believed.
SUNDAY TELEGRAPH: “Madeleine McCann abduction leaves family holidays haunted by fear”
The exodus to the sun starts this weekend - but since the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, parents are feeling paranoid about the safety of their offspring. Foreigners think we are mad, reports Lucy Cavendish from Mallorca
Mad pervs and Englishmen…
Says Lucy Cavendish:
You can always spot the English abroad. Not by the way they dress or their sunburnt skin but by how protective they are of their children.
Always!
“I feel I can’t leave my children alone for a second,” says Joanne Brown as she sits in a café next to the beach at Port de Soller in Mallorca. “It’s a nightmare. I’ve always been conscious of where my children are on holiday, but now I feel much more aware of them. If I shut my eyes for a moment, I feel terrified that they won’t be there when I open them.
Abracadabra. Fish ‘n’ chips. Poof!
But ever since last May, when three-year-old Madeleine McCann disappeared from her bedroom in Praia da Luz, Portugal, there is an almost tangible parental fear that underlies family holidays: that someone will take our children and we will never see them again.
Matchsticks in the eyes. Don’t dare to look away.
Post-Maddie, holidaying abroad has become a minefield. The parameters have shifted. Where once parents might have left children in a play area/on the beach/in a café while they quickly whipped off to go to the loo/order a meal/get some drinks, now we dare not. We reappraise all the time, scan people’s faces on beaches, by the swimming pool, in the play area. We are constantly asking ourselves: who is safe? What is safe? Are kids’ clubs fine? Are the staff vetted properly?
Anorak advocates the CoZee Reins – modelled on the penal system of Alabama, these handy chains with optional heavy ball attachment ensure the kidz are kept within shouting distance.
Tell Armani to “come ‘ere or I‘m, gonna kill yer”, and see her find no way of escape”.
On holiday with the Lucy Cavendishes:
One night, my 11-year-old son asked if he and his brothers, aged five and three, could sleep in this separate room. “Of course!” I replied.
Later on, when they were asleep, I got myself into a terrible panic. My eldest son had said he didn’t want to lock the door in case any of them needed to go to the loo in the night. This seemed to make sense.
At 2am, I woke up in a hot sweat. I imagined nameless, faceless marauders creeping up from the beach, slipping into the place and making off with one of them.
I woke my husband up. “The boys are ALONE!” I screamed. “It’s not going to happen here,” he said, immediately knowing what I was referring to. “This is Devon.”
But, as every parent now knows, it doesn’t matter if it’s Devon or Praia da Luz. Everyone is afraid of the stranger, the person out there who, in our minds, wants to steal and harm our children.
Was that her husband screaming?
THE GUARDIAN: “Madeleine police chief to launch ‘explosive’ book”
Gonçalo Amaral, who was chief of the criminal investigation police for the Algarve region, has scheduled a news conference in Lisbon on Thursday to launch the book, just three days after the widely expected announcement tomorrow that the case is being shelved by prosecutors for lack of evidence.
In the book, provisionally entitled True Lies, Amaral is also likely to reopen his assault on the role of the British police in the investigation. He has publicly suggested that they were influenced throughout by the leads which Madeleine’s parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, wanted pursued.
He is said to be convinced that Madeleine is dead, while the McCanns have continued to press investigators to follow the trail of potential kidnappers and ensure their daughter’s safe return.
THE SUNDAY TIMES: “Murder most modern- Kate Summerscale’s prize-winning account of an 1860 killing shows how little we’ve changed”
Ed Caesar looks at the 1860 murder of Saville Kent in The Suspicions of Mr Whicher.
What is most striking about her account (and this, perhaps, is what won the judges’ favour) is that it echoes contemporary culture. The huge interest in, and continual theorising about, the disappearance of an infant; the castigation of detectives for their incompetence; the swings of compassion towards or against suspects — all mirror the case of our own missing child, Madeleine McCann.
Our Maddie.
SUNDAY HERALD: “Courts make editors think hard before delving into private lives - Judiciary increasingly taking the view that public interest must be stronger than potential harm”
Although Madeleine McCann “aguido” Robert Murat’s £600,000 payout last week from 11 newspapers after successfully suing for the separate offence of defamation, editors are being forcefully reminded to think longer and harder about what stories papers can and should run.
Indeed. A current story in Correio da Manha has not repeated in the UK press about the case.
Posted: 20th, July 2008 | In: Broadsheets, Madeleine McCann, Tabloids Comments (431) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





July 27th, 2008 at 12:09 am
As an investigator, Gonçalo Amaral used to be a professional - How competent, I don’t know. As a spin doctor he is a rank amateur, and his chances against the McCann machine can be compared to those of the proverbial snowball in Hell.
Here’s what he should do:
1. Hire a very good English-speaking spokesperson. Such professionals’ sevices come very expensive, to be sure, but the book’s profits should be enough to pay for them, even if they have to be supplenented by a fund-raising campaign.
2. Ensure the book is translated first into Spanish, promote it in the Hispanic world, including the Hispanic parts of the USA; then to French, German, Russian, japanese, Chinese and so on; and only then into English. This way he would be able to present his case to a candid world before he presented it to the biased juri of British public opinion.
3. Hire the best possible team of libel lawyers available to him in Britain. Scan everything British media have ever said about him with a view to sue, and sue wherever remotely possible. Be very public and very loud in his demand that the damages paid to him should be the highest in British legal history, based on the excepcional harm done to him (the British media have made “Gonçalo Amaral” practically synonymous with “Hannibal Lecter”).
Speaking for myself, I neither know nor care very much whether the UK is still what the rest of the world calls a democracy. Assuming that it is and wishes to remain so, it really, really should do something about its gutter press.
July 21st, 2008 at 9:35 pm
Rasputin,
How can you say that ???
Clearly abandoning a minor is in itself is a form of harm. As it transpired to the disappearence this is beond any question of guilt of neglect. They should be made accountable to this minimum.
Enough poor single parents who have tried to leave there children for less time have had the attention and results of their wrath put upon them. Why should alledgedly clever doctors be immune???
July 21st, 2008 at 9:28 pm
Bountyhunter
Try this link to find where the others are hanging out
http://www.anorak.co.uk/tabloids/186052.html#comment-347976
July 21st, 2008 at 9:23 pm
if i do not get attention soon, will have to go to the far side to get latest re the lifting of status
July 21st, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Hi all i am stuck at 11.09 July 21 !!
When i try to post I get Error4o4.
Could someone please direct me to where you are, it is 8.40 pm here and i am stuick on desktop with Windows 98, plus i only have dial up connection.
Help help help
July 21st, 2008 at 11:09 am
You are all sick. Easy to sit on the sideline and slander. Also, do you seriously not have anything better to do??? Just sit on this site all day and play “chat room table tennis” with each other… And what exactly does this resolve or solve at the end of you boring tiresome days. You are all pathetic!
July 21st, 2008 at 11:05 am
424 Karen Says:
” Ferd
That wasn’t humour.
Seriously.
That was Gerry being a tosser. ”
For me it was a piece of black humour. Not the kind of humour that causes an outburst of laughter though.
July 21st, 2008 at 10:44 am
Ferd
That wasn’t humour.
Seriously.
That was Gerry being a tosser.
July 21st, 2008 at 9:50 am
And Woody Allen is such a brilliant role model on the whole father daughter thing…
July 21st, 2008 at 9:44 am
… could have been right from a Woody Allen movie…
July 21st, 2008 at 9:40 am
419 Karen:
What do you think of this quotation from the Vanity Fair article (see anorak.co.uk/madeleine-mccann/179232.html ):
And the Madeleine ‘Look into my eyes’ campaign? Says Gerry: “We thought it was possible this could hurt her. Her abductor might do something to her eye. But in marketing terms it was a good ploy”
If this isn’t the humour of the gallows…
July 21st, 2008 at 9:35 am
Yes Ferdy - just like that.
July 21st, 2008 at 9:33 am
Ferd
Puns?????????????
July 21st, 2008 at 9:28 am
409 Noseycow Says:
” Perhaps if G had added little smilies we might have ‘got’ the self mockery, long before now
”
Like the playback laughter in anglo-american comedies, which indicates the puns?
July 21st, 2008 at 9:22 am
Ferdy
Sorry love, but I think you’re flogging a dead horse with this one.
July 21st, 2008 at 9:17 am
Karen Says:
” Ferd
”
I was born in Govan. I don’t need a lesson in Glaswegian humour!
You may skip my post 413 then.
July 21st, 2008 at 9:14 am
Karen
Agreed, absolutely NO WAY was he being funny, though it makes me wonder whether this might be the pink ones ‘new angle’ to explain the blog.
July 21st, 2008 at 9:12 am
Ferd
I was born in Govan. I don’t need a lesson in Glaswegian humour!
He was being genial - not funny.
July 21st, 2008 at 9:06 am
Found that quotation from Glasgow born film director Bill Forsyth:
I think that Glaswegian humour is very similar to New York humour, which is really Jewish humour for it is the humour of despair, the humour of the gallows. The humour of awful circumstances or predicaments. I think that is where humour comes from. From situations where the only way out is to laugh, for survival’s sake. At the bottom of every joke is a piece of despair, you can’t produce a laugh without it. If someone falls on a banana skin you get a laugh, but someone gets hurt.
July 21st, 2008 at 9:06 am
Ferdinand:
395 Karen Says:
”Personally I think they suspected the parents because K & G lied about the checks (IMO), talked b0llocks in the press and let all their friends trample over the crime scene despite knowing instantly it was an abduction. It was probably more of a Fuck You than anything else. ”
I forgive them the crime scene thing, because if your daughter is missing, you would of course search the apparment frantically (is she hiding behind the sofa, in the wardrobe etc), and forget about forensics. That’s for the police to ensure.”
But they INSISTED it was an abduction from the start. Not a child hiding behind a sofa, and only coming to a gradual realisation that abduction was a hossible possibility after many hours of looking for a lost daughter.
They INSISTED, and therefore in their own eyes the apartment was a crime scene from the start, which they then let, or caused to be trashed.
July 21st, 2008 at 9:04 am
morning all
new thread
July 21st, 2008 at 9:03 am
Ferd
Gerry! Self-mock! Are you mad????
July 21st, 2008 at 9:03 am
Ferdinand Says:
July 21st, 2008 at 8:57 am
404 Karen Says:
“Ferd
I don’t think he was joking in his blogs. IMO he’s genuinely emotionally thick. ”
So you think that the waffle about jogging could be anything else than self-mockery?
————————————————————————————————-
Perhaps if G had added little smilies we might have ‘got’ the self mockery, long before now
July 21st, 2008 at 9:02 am
Brandon
We happy few can keep the flame of disapproval burning.
July 21st, 2008 at 8:57 am
404 Karen Says:
“Ferd
”
I don’t think he was joking in his blogs. IMO he’s genuinely emotionally thick.
So you think that the waffle about jogging could be anything else than self-mockery?
July 21st, 2008 at 8:52 am
No news till 4 !!!!!
Trust them I cant concentrate then!!!!
July 21st, 2008 at 8:47 am
I wonder if any of their blogging/ jogging/ interview behaviour was in the files?
bloody should have been!!
July 21st, 2008 at 8:47 am
Ferd
I don’t think he was joking in his blogs. IMO he’s genuinely emotionally thick.
July 21st, 2008 at 8:45 am
Brandon
I’d already seen that on GMTV - let the whitewash begin!
I’ve never seen loyalty like it.
July 21st, 2008 at 8:44 am
Karen Says:
” Ferd
”
I don’t think even a Glaswegian is going to crack that kind of joke. Not for the 1st couple of weeks anyway.
But the same could be said about some of Gerry’s early blog entries…
July 21st, 2008 at 8:42 am
sky blaming british forensic services
leading pj up wrong path