Zachary Jackson Levon Furnish-John: Photos Of Elton John’s Son
by Anorak | 30th, December 2010
ELTON John, 62, is now father to Zachary Jackson Levon Furnish-John. The birth mum is a surrogate. (Whose egg? Liz Hurley? Liz Taylor? Liz Windsor?) The other dad is Elton’s husband David Furnish, 48. Anorak likes the name, although the double-barreled surname evokes images of a smark downstairs privy.
The lad can always change it to, say, Zachary Jackson Levon Furnish-Dwight, a nod of dad’s pre-fame birth name.
Posted: 30th, December 2010 | In: Key Posts, Music Comments (77) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
September 4th, 2012 at 1:15 pm
Yes well Elton can suck on my sno-cone anytime!
January 18th, 2011 at 3:57 pm
Now, now let’s be nice with your remarks, Clive and Percy, over what I have or would call Percy! Tad bit of exaggerating on both of your parts!
Percy, I think it is wonderful that you would be willing to donate your sperm so that others could have children who are unable too. However, I do have to admit I can’t quite visualize how this world would be with lots of little Percys running around.
The baby is just beautiful – didn’t do a bad job, did they! However, I have to admit I don’t totally approve of their having numerous nannies to help care for their wee one. If us ‘ordinary’ people can raise a wee one walking the floors or rocking the baby when fussy, changing dirty nappies, heating up bottles in the middle of the night, going without sleep days on end, there is absolutely no reason those two shouldn’t experience those same ‘joys’ that comes with having a wee one.
January 18th, 2011 at 3:32 pm
….and buy myself a new keyboard…for some strange reason the keys keep getting stuck on this one…
January 18th, 2011 at 3:15 pm
methinks you may be right ,June….my micro-me’s would be so cheeky,cheesey & cute….who could possibly resist or be offended by their charms……and with the healthy profits made from my priceless porcine sperm….I could retire gracefully to a life of sand,sun & sin somewhere in the Caribbean Sea
…f*ck the fund..I believe in giving…but…..charity begins at home……
January 18th, 2011 at 3:13 pm
methinks you may be right ,June….my micro-me’s would be so cheeky,cheesey & cute….who could possibly resist or be offended by their charms……and with the healthy profits made from my priceless porcine sperm….I could retire gracefully to a life of sand,sun & sin somewhere in the Caribbean S
…f*ck the fund..I believe in giving…but…..charity begins at home……
January 18th, 2011 at 2:33 pm
I can imagine it now Percy, they get told to smile and they all say ‘Stilton’, unless they are of Italian descent and they say ‘Gorgonzola’ meanwhile grinning like cheshire cats all the way to the bank
OINK! thats the way to do it
So which tax haven will you make your future home on?
January 18th, 2011 at 2:22 pm
…. just consider the kind of cover a super celeb like Kerry Katona or Jordan could get in O.K. if they gave birth to one of my cheesey micro- pig sprogs…..my sperm is priceless I tell yer, June
January 18th, 2011 at 2:18 pm
…more cheesey celebrity micro pigs…thats what the world is crying out for….well the likes of the News of the World & O.K. anyway…..
January 18th, 2011 at 2:12 pm
Sprogs of Stilton? oh sweet little tiny cheeses!
January 18th, 2011 at 1:58 pm
: )
January 18th, 2011 at 1:16 pm
Percy
Just be thankful she doesn’t call you wanker in view of your donations
January 18th, 2011 at 1:08 pm
…kind hearted of me I know….and yet Cheryl still has the cheek to call me “nasty”…..
January 18th, 2011 at 1:05 pm
June …I have already started saving up my sperm to donate to such a charitable Fund as you suggested, that helps hard up celebs aquire the kind of kids they otherwise could’nt afford to procure or keep in the comfort they they have become accustomed to…
January 18th, 2011 at 12:30 pm
We must immediately, and without another thought , set up a Fund for these deprived souls
January 18th, 2011 at 12:04 pm
Sorry Percy, I’ve obviously misjudged them and the nannies and separate apartment are probably also wicked rumours.
Now you’ve made me realise how expensive designer babies can be, I feel quite sorry for them.
January 18th, 2011 at 11:04 am
lol..:))))))
January 18th, 2011 at 9:49 am
Don’t forget the two nannies and the separate apartment, but to be fair Elton did go back to work two weeks after the birth, there was a dreadful piccie of him in the Wail, and he hasn’t recovered his pre baby figure yet either, or maybe he has , it was hard to tell…….
Although we must be very fair, the mag did say the fees were being given to charity, but that write up, ye gods!
January 18th, 2011 at 9:33 am
Karen…how can you be so cynical & cruel ?…surely you know how much it costs to keep a baby in the kind of comfort its parents have been accustomed to…
Besides the obvious litleluxuries of life…. bottles,nappies & bibs don’t come cheap either…and its does’nt get any easierer as the baby grows up….designer label clothes, flash cars & coke cost a f*cking fortune nowadays…even for the rich & famous…
January 18th, 2011 at 9:22 am
Lovely family photo – just look at those doting parents.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/172552/First-pics-of-Elton-John-s-new-baby/
I suppose you don’t end up with a £200million fortune without seizing every money-making opportunity.
January 15th, 2011 at 4:25 pm
Elton and his ‘husband’ (?) where not denied the baby in the Ukraine because they were homosexually deceived, but because of Eltons age.
January 14th, 2011 at 12:08 am
June, your arguments are brilliant!!!! so much sense! Thank you, it’s such a valuable contribution to this discussion!
You’re absolutely right: people view a child as a ‘product’ and not a human being and in the least cases (if any) the best interests of a child are considered.
By “mimicing heterosexuals” they deprive the child of maternal bonding, love. Whatever you say, you can not deny that the relationship between a mother and her child is known to be special and irreplaceable. A mother is able to listen to her heartbeat meshing with the heartbeat of her child. Maternal love is sealed through the physical process of giving birth to the baby. Activities after birth will only strengthen this maternal bond as well. One of the biggest examples of this would be breast feeding. Many studies proved that maternal love makes children form a secure bond with their mothers, meaning they are able to feel secure when grown up, will have better social skills and cope better with life’s difficulties so the very earliest life experiences can influence our well-being in future.
January 12th, 2011 at 4:36 pm
Percy dear, I said ‘nastily’ said! That does not mean I look upon you as a nasty person!
You took me by surprise with your comments! You’ll recall when I was making no nice observations about those women who were involved with TW, you quickly came to their defense and somewhat chastised me for my not nice remarks. Thus, I naturally presumed it was not in you to say or tolerate unkind remarks about others.
January 12th, 2011 at 4:25 pm
Hi Cheryl
Of course I do not believe every baby conceived and born naturally will be perfect
but surely it increases the odds of imperfections if the baby is artificially created.
Bottom line – why muck about with nature/ karma/God whatever.
January 12th, 2011 at 4:08 pm
Dear Cheryl, I did’nt put you down as one of those type of people that might percieve me as being “nasty”… as you so kindly put it…..but then you never can tell ,can you?
January 12th, 2011 at 4:01 pm
Clive, no one is guaranteed a ‘perfect’ baby! All one has to do is look back throughout their life and have known or hear of all those couples who had their babies without any artificial help (which wasn’t available back then) and the baby was born with deformities; Downs Syndrome; mentally retarded; die upon birth or born dead; brain damaged from the birth; spinal bifida; genes from the parents from which the baby will die by two years of age; etc. The list is endless of what those and all babies conceived normally who are less than ‘perfect’ can be born with or die from at an early age or will never live a ‘normal’ life.
January 12th, 2011 at 2:49 pm
Cheryl
I am one of those who is adamantly against AI, IVF or whatever ways to try to get round nature. I have seen resulting less than perfect babies coming fom such treatment. Having said that, I do not go around protesting about it but see no reason to feel ashamed about my beliefs.
As to the poor inadequates who feel their life is incomplete without their “own” baby, and can’t accept nature, they are welcome to use their own resources as they see fit,.However I resent every penny our National Health Service spends on this.
January 12th, 2011 at 2:34 pm
Percy, I can’t believe you are like those many other judgmental people who think they have the right to question, dictate to or condemn those many thousands of people who long for a baby and have to use other means to have them.
All those who are speaking out against people who use IVF, surrogate mothers, another woman’s eggs, or another man’s sperm to have the child they long for should be ashamed of yourselves! All of you and people just like you are the exact reason why thousands of parents keep quiet and don’t tell others what lengths they went to to have their babies they longed for.
It isn’t just the ‘rich and the famous’ who “cherry pick designer babies for their hair,skin & eye colour and artificially bring them into this “polluted by people” world”, as you so nastily put it, Percy, it is also those ‘ordinary’ people in this world who use their life-savings, remortgage their homes in attempts to have the baby the long for by whatever means.
January 12th, 2011 at 2:24 pm
I have not personally insulted you at all, June and because I respect your views (even if I don’t agree with them), I have been very careful not to do so – you should know that from reading some of my more acid comments to those coming on this site for whom I have little time or respect.
I enjoy our mutual correspondence, June and have no wish to jeopardise that, therefore this is the last comment I will be leaving on this subject.
January 12th, 2011 at 2:23 pm
I agree with Yampy. I’m about to open some more popcorn.
January 12th, 2011 at 2:17 pm
I can’t see any personal insults June. I can see the best discusiion on Anorak for ages and I have been following it avidly.
January 12th, 2011 at 2:12 pm
Adoption is good alternative, but creating a child isn’t in this instance. I have never gone along with gays having children tailor made, because one partner will be out on a limb., both should be adoptive parents or neither. If one of them has had a previous heterosexual relationship and have a child, that is different.
But they are gays, why do they mimic heterosexuals?
I also think women past the menopause who start a pregnancy using other womens eggs are wrong
Its my opinion, not law, and I fail to see how my views can be deemed selfish, I’m not attempting to stop them, just commenting on the topic which they, not I, made public.
I’m not going to discuss this any further with you as you have started making personal insults because I don’t agree with you.