Jacqui Smith In Home Porn Scandal
JACQUI Smith, the pot-smoking Home Secretary, has been caught in an expenses row - using taxpayers’ money to pay for porn films.
Can the matter be explained as research into the sex industry she wishes to stamp on? Did any of the films feature East European slaves? And should we the taxpayers get to see the evidence and decide for ourselves?
Julie Bindel: Do you know anyone personally who has used a prostitute?
JS: [Hesitates] No.
Not paying for sex… How about “downloading” prostitutes? Is that a thought crime, a gateway drug to shagging prostitutes or rape, Jacqui?
JB: Some commentators have suggested that this new law won’t lead to many prosecutions - do you think that this is correct?
JS: It is likely we will get more prosecutions than when we were solely reliant on rape as an offence [in cases where men bought sex with trafficked women]. Of course, I understand that this is the start of the process. But we need to send out a message to men to think twice.
And rape? Is downloading porn a gateway drug to rape?
MEN who knowingly pay for sex with a trafficked girl will be charged with RAPE under tough new laws. Home Secretary Jacqui Smith wants to end the evil trade of smuggling women into Britain to become sex slaves. She claimed seven out of ten hookers are run by pimps or had been trafficked into Britain by organised crime gangs.
Now read on…
Sunday Express: “JACQUI SMITH PUT ADULT FILMS ON EXPENSES”
Sunday Express, owned by Richard Desmond, the man who once gave us Asian Babes and now presides over Channel X, exposes porn story shocker?!
The Express that brought us:
“SWEARING NOW THE BLIGHT OF BRITAIN - How TV is degrading our public life.”
Desmond who brought his newspaper from:
“…old Etonian, anti-Semitic, fucking wankers”
And what Channel did the Home Sexretary watch?
Daily Mail: “Blue movies on expenses: How Jacqui Smith’s husband watched pornographic movies… paid for by the taxpayer”
Blue movies. Adult books. Martial aides. The Mail is so demure…
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith’s political future was in jeopardy tonight after it was revealed that her husband used her Commons expenses allowance to pay to watch pornographic films. Richard Timney, who works as Ms Smith’s Commons adviser, used part of the Minister’s second-homes allowance to pay for the blue movies he watched on a subscription television channel.
Home Sexretary And Dicky:
The relationship between Ms Smith and her husband was said by Government insiders to be ‘very difficult,’ but stressed that the couple were still together. It is understood that Mr Timney had been watching explicit adult movies on channels broadcast on the Virgin Media cable TV service.
The scandal revolves around an invoice on which Mr Timney is believed to have made the expenses claims. Subscribers to the service can access X-rated films on the Playboy Channel, the Adult Channel and Television X for around £11 a month. It is also possible to order adult channels on a pay-per-night basis for £5
Television X, which is owned by…?
PA: “Home Secretary in expenses apology”
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith has apologised and promised to pay back money which she wrongly claimed for a television package which was reported to include adult movies. Ms Smith said she “mistakenly” claimed for the television package while submitting a bill for an internet connection.
Ben Westwood, son of fashion designer Vivienne Westwood, suggested that “Jack Straw and the Home Secretary Jacqui Smith need to be bound up together and gagged”. So logn as she pays for the rope and cuffs herself, then no harm done. No, actually, she can claim on expenses. We’ll let that one slide.
It-was-for-research-purposes!
Sky News: “Home Sec In ‘Adult Film’ Expenses Row”
Ms Smith said through her spokesman: “I am sorry that in claiming for my internet connection, I mistakenly claimed for a television package alongside it.
“As soon as the matter was brought to my attention, I took immediate steps to contact the relevant parliamentary authorities and rectify the situation.
“All money claimed for the television package will be paid back in full.”
Daily Telegraph: “Must we really subsidise pornography for Jacqui Smith’s husband?”
Milo Yiannopoulos says:
But even I feel a little sorry for her now. Smith’s marriage has been on the rocks for some time, and her husband - whom we pay £40,000 a year to run her Redditch office - is becoming a serious liability.
If these fresh allegations turn out to be true, Smith must resign.
Why her husband? Why can’t Smith have enjoyed the porn?
Posted: 30th, March 2009 | In: Key Posts, Politicians Comments (10) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- yampster on British Law Elevates Climate Change Belief To Same Status As Relgion
- Clive on Judge Rules Transexual Burglar Has Rotten Life And Must Remain Free
- June on British Law Elevates Climate Change Belief To Same Status As Relgion
- yampster on British Law Elevates Climate Change Belief To Same Status As Relgion
- dairy on Katie Price And Peter Andre Burnt At The Stake, In Pictures
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:13 am
I found this story really quite funny, especially when it emerged exactly what he had been watching http://hotmandy.wordpress.com/2009/03/31/home-secretarys-hubby-loves-hot-amateurs-too/ Still though, if this is where UK taxes are going I think the financial crisis might be here to stay!
April 1st, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Hmmm I’m more interested in Mr Timney and his “1-on-a-sofa sex romps” - being paid a salary of £40k per annum to look after your own kids in a house which is your main residence but not that of your spouse for which you pay no rent but which is funded entirely by the taxpayer (including council tax) must be a very dodgy position when it comes to filling in a tax return (think ‘benefits in kind’) I’d love to know what the HM Revenue & customs make of his position…
Those on benefits have to buy their own sink plugs.
March 30th, 2009 at 7:45 pm
Who cares what he does in the privacy of his home, with or without Mrs S on hand (so to speak)? She does apparently, as do the media and so on. These movies are there to sexually stimulate - if she’s that bothered then let her have a go at banning Virgin and the others from the air waves and see where it gets her.
I suspect that the actors are ‘willing and able’ and not forced to make these movies for these ‘respectable’ channels, so what’s her problem?
Time to stop pretending………Mrs J………..get real, otherwise we’ll think that like your leader, you are in denial about what’s going on in the real world.
Just stop using tax payers money please to keep Mr S relaxed and with a smile on his face.
March 30th, 2009 at 12:51 am
Yes, but there was that time someone bought him a cheese grater. He said it was the most violent book he’s ever read.
March 29th, 2009 at 11:09 pm
Bring back Blunkett. No one ever accused him of looking at mucky videos on the company books
March 29th, 2009 at 10:23 pm
The Home Secretary’s career lies in ruins because of what her Secretary does at home! Oh, the irony. It’s a sad fact that no Home Secretary seems to last more than about two years, hardly time enough to get your name on the door!
March 29th, 2009 at 10:11 pm
This is a personal tragedy for Jacqui Smith. Clearly she’s not able to satisfy her partner’s natural biological urges and this has driven him to watch synthetic sex broadcast on late-night adult channels.
How awful for her that her bedroom problems should become public knowledge in this manner. My advice to her is that she should re-prioritise her personal life now and attempt to re-establish normal physical relationships with her partner.
March 29th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
This has put a smile on my face and inspired me to write a song… what a great story.
March 29th, 2009 at 3:40 pm
Let’s see.. What do we know about Jacqui
1. She doesn’t do the business at work….
2. She doesn’t do the business at home…
Good bye Jacqui
March 29th, 2009 at 10:12 am
I’m dizzy from doing a whirligig spin of joy around the room. Will this be the undoing of that demented taker (away) of liberties? One can only hope - while my right kneecap throbs with pain from collision with the coffee table, a grin is still plastered across what I laughingly refer to as my face. See ya, Jacqui…hopefully.