Madeleine McCann: In Morrocco With ‘Maddie’s Pervert’
MADELEINE McCann Watch: “Maddie’s pervert” and the thin man watcheth…
DAILY Mirror: “COPS PROBE MADDIE PERVERT’S QUICK ESCAPE FROM PORTUGAL”
Justin Penrose has news of a “Maddie pervert” - someone who gets off on Our Maddie…
British police probing the disappearance of Madeleine McCann want to know why paedophile Raymond Hewlett left Portugal so quickly after she vanished.
Raymond Hewlett is now the Mirror’s “Maddie Pervert”.
They have quizzed a witness who says sex attacker Hewlett told of being outside the apartment where Maddie was snatched “several times”.
So Madeleine McCann was snatched. That is now also a fact. Justin Penrose is on the case:
Ex-ScotGuard Peter Verran, 46, was questioned by a detective from Leicestershire for two hours this week about his three months in Morocco with Hewlett, 64.
Peter told the Sunday Mirror: “He seemed interested in how Hewlett told me he packed up and left Portugal within 30 minutes shortly after Madeleine vanished.”
Wonder why a detective was interested in that piece of news?
Police also wanted to know how the convicted paedophile and drifter could afford to flee to North Africa, which would have cost him around £1,000.
Would it? A ferry from Algeciras in Spain to Ceuta, the Spanish enclave on the tip of Morroco, costs 354.00 euros two ways, inclusive of van.
They want to find out if he was paid a large cash sum - and how he got his six children there without passports. “I said if he managed to get six in there was no reason he couldn’t get seven,” said Peter.
Daily Star: “MADDIE: WEIRDO TOOK PHOTOS”
Madeleine McCann may have been photographed by her abductor in the days before she disappeared.
May. Such are the facts.
Witnesses told investigators working for her parents Kate and Gerry that an oddball seen lurking near their holiday apartment may have been carrying a “device”.
Oddball? Device?
Others reported seeing a man taking pictures of young children in the area.
Remember this from, er, two years ago? And this from last August:
SUNDAY TELEGRAPH: “Madeleine McCann: ‘Strange Englishman’ photographed children on beach - A “strange Englishman” was spotted taking pictures of children on a Portuguese beach visited by Madeleine McCann just before she went missing, police files reveal.”
The Star’s report has gone nowhere. Today:
One local, restaurant owner Ernesto Mochacho, described a “tall, thin Englishman in his 40s” taking photos at a beach Maddie visited. His description is similar to that of a weirdo seen near the McCanns’ holiday apartment in Praia da Luz.
Is he related to the Ernesto Mochacho who told the papers last August:
Mr Mochacho recalled seeing the McCanns with their three children for the last time at his restaurant in April. His son, who also works at the restaurant, the only one on the beach, said he told police he had seen a “tall, thin Englishman in his forties” taking photographs.
Madeleine McCann is missing - still missing… And everyone wants to be a credible helper - this one. And this one. And this one… And him. And him…
Posted: 31st, May 2009 | In: Key Posts, Madeleine McCann, Media Comments (87) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- Steve on Naked Kelly Brook Is Ordered To Get Bigger Buns
- Steve on Katie Price And Peter Andre Burnt At The Stake, In Pictures
- yampster on Madeleine McCann: Let’s Blame The Muslims
- Steve on Police Log: Mum Tells Police Of Daughter’s Oral Sex Skills
- Maria on Madeleine McCann: Sean And Amelie Get Speaking Parts, In Pictures
June 6th, 2009 at 5:44 pm
and we all know who Sean Scholfield is don’t we? Sorry mate, you have to better than that with your never-ending conspiracy silliness and attempted phoney syntax!
June 6th, 2009 at 12:44 pm
If you click on the red Rss 2.0 thingy at the bottom of Anorak’s articles you can see the comments that are floating in cyberspace, not sure of the science behind it but it works for me
June 6th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
Yo Yampster that post naming someone and the adress is still visible.
And I keep forgetting to change the email. Think I’ll have to clear cookies.
Pity they aren’t real chocolate cookies though.
June 6th, 2009 at 11:26 am
Totje,
It’s not just you. Some of my posts take 15 to 30 mins to appear. I don’t think they are in moderation………
Otherwise that last one, giving someones name and address, would not have got through. I wonder how long it will last?
June 6th, 2009 at 9:49 am
phillip steven kilvington based in tregaron west wales is the slimeball feeding the daily snail with all this crap info as the portugese police have correctley stated piss off and leave us alone the little girl is dead killed accidentley by her mother, at that point kilvington, in his capacity as an employee of control risks, a private security company on a lucrative goverment contract to monitor nhs workers intervened to queer the investigation, this man was also responsible for impeding a legitimate and neccersary investigation into the july 7th bombings in london,
these clowns will go to any extremes to exhaust and screw up legit investigations for their own benefit, they also liase with corrupt police official such as norman bettison, of west yorkshire police to bring you the uk public cases such as the karen matthews kidnap plot, that case was so obvious in that someone was pulling thne strings from behind i mean i ask you good readers how could someone with an iq of just75 conceive plan and execute a operastion likre that, incoceivable, piss off back to australia or south africa you genetic throwbacks there is no room for you lot in modern western europe youre not wanted and nobody will do busness your way your a day late and a dollar short suckers
June 6th, 2009 at 6:42 am
See, I told you so!
For Chenny:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lKNq-A-OqNs
Moderator - Don’t take it personally, the software hates quite a few people
June 6th, 2009 at 6:40 am
Looks like you’re all serious. I’m not as I expect to get launched in that d*** space shuttle again.
======
Hi chenny
Engelbert Humperdink yeah. Horrible isn’t it? My mum loved him as well as that creepy creature of BoneyM. Eeeeeeeeek!
There should be a law against posting both of them on YouTube.
But you know me, I can’t resist teasing and it got you back.
======
coolandcalm
Didn’t you love that Channel 4 petition too?
House of parliament : FOR SALE. 646 copies of “60 reasons” book. Unwanted gift.
Mr ‘I’m going to publish your name/address/ picture of your house if you don’t agree with me’ is in a short version Voldemort.
=====
Has Yampster’s been telling stories about me?
Now would somebody tell me why I vanished into space even when I used the @# yahoo thing? I’m a good girl, really I am.
And I still have to catch up these posts…
June 5th, 2009 at 6:22 pm
The Mcs have long made it clear that there is a reward for information which would help them find out what happened. Read their posters. They say nothing about the sort of person they will, or will not, give reward money to! As you say, Cheryl, one would do precisely that.
I think the point is that he cannot possibly expect money BEFORE he gives them the info. IF he gives them info which is shown to be genuinely useful, true etc. then I don’t see how the reward money could be refused……….
BUT………..what would happen if the person actually responsible for taking Madeleine were ever to turn him/herself in??
June 5th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
Cheryl, when I said quiet I actually meant nothing much happening outside the game of ping pong with Hewlett. After all, there are other people of interest to the investigation to which there has been no news.
Don’t know how much media hype this is:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1191094/Paedophile-Raymond-Hewlett-admits-I-saw-Madeleine-McCann-twice-disappeared.html
Either Hewlett is as brazen as they come, knows nothing, and thinks he can get away with leading the investigators up a blind alley
or
He is involved and thinks he can get away with it and make some money by giving the investigators false leads.
Personally, I don’t think there’s any ‘underworld’ involved in this abduction. I think it more likely she was taken by someone and that someone (local) is the only person who knows what actually happened.
June 5th, 2009 at 2:53 pm
June, that is true. However, if there is truth to the story that he has demanded money for information he has about her disappearance, I would think the police would be all over him like flies on rancid meat making him ‘offers’ he’d best not refuse to acertain exactly what he knows.
June 5th, 2009 at 9:33 am
Engelbert Humperdink?
Is there no law about inflicting him on innocent posters as we meander along life’s highway?
And if there isn’t there should be…
June 5th, 2009 at 8:28 am
Cheryl
The reward money if she is found is huge, most honest people would happily take much less.
Isn’t the size of it purely to tempt the underworld into revealing information for (the underworlds) financial gain anyway.
We still haven’t heard of any arrest by West Yorks Police, and had they had any information on the MM case they would have informed Leics police , and also arrested him.
The rest of it is likely media hype
June 5th, 2009 at 3:22 am
Grande Finale, I think any of us would pay any amount of money to have information on our missing child. In my mind the McCanns are now between a rock and a hard spot - damned if they do and damned if they don’t. He is a true piece of rancid garabage putting a price on information he may have in his possession. Wonder if there are laws over there covering such a situation as has now arisen. Is he trying to extort money from them by demanding money for information he has? What if they do pay him for information and he turns around and claims they were giving him a bribe to say what they want? Does he really know jackshit!
Yet on the other hand he is a true person of interest - a known paedophile and lived in proximity of the Resort. Can we place credence in anything the people who claim to have befriended him said he told them? However, didn’t he say early on Madeleine was not abducted as her parents claimed? So what information does he have to sell them now? Truth or Lies?
June 5th, 2009 at 2:21 am
69 Cheryl says:
June 4th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Garth, no it isn’t quiet, look what is in the DailyMail.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1190856/Paedophile-Raymond-Hewlett-demands-money-answer-Madeleine-McCann-questions.html
What a real slimeball, if what the DailyMail printed is true. They can’t pay him a penny for any information he may or may not have. That sob knows that!
******************************
Cheryl ?? if He had any information regarding the whereabouts of MBM it would be worth 2 million Euro’s!!
June 4th, 2009 at 11:57 pm
HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6S9ecXWCBCc
June 4th, 2009 at 11:54 pm
Think I forgot the yahoo email addy :oops::
Post vanished into space, not even into moderation.
June 4th, 2009 at 11:50 pm
Phew, looks like I have to do a lot of reading tomorrow.
June 4th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Garth, no it isn’t quiet, look what is in the DailyMail.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1190856/Paedophile-Raymond-Hewlett-demands-money-answer-Madeleine-McCann-questions.html
What a real slimeball, if what the DailyMail printed is true. They can’t pay him a penny for any information he may or may not have. That sob knows that!
June 4th, 2009 at 3:59 pm
Forgot to post the link: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/05/08/police-chief-admits-errors-in-madeleine-mccann-case-115875-21340815/
June 4th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Maria, he is a surrreal piece of work. In a press conference last month (link below) he “finally admitted the Portugese Police bungled the job.” Portugese Police bungled the job? A Portugese policeman “bungled the job” but the Portugal Police officials stood by and permitted him to bungle that job for all most five months, imo. Then he says “Its true. At the time there was no set procedure for a missing child. The crime scene was not well looked after.” It didn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that he didn’t have a clue on how to conduct a proper investigation without having it spelled out in writing in a police manual step-by-step for him to refer to as he went along, imo. As stated in the previous article I posted “As was the case with the Madeleine investigation, the hunt for Joana was hindered because police failed to seal off the house where she was last seen.”
Note how easily he solved the Cipriano case without having set procedures to follow in doing an investigation of a missing child, he accused the mother. She admitted she did it when questioned. Granted someone or someones beat the living hell out of her to refresh her memory but the case was solved.
What does he do to solve the McCann case just as quickly and easily without knowing procedures to follow in doing a proper investigation of a missing child, imo? He accuses Kate McCann of taking her daughter’s life. That worked in the Cipriano case. Wasn’t quite that easy to refresh Kate McCann’s memory when she screamed she didn’t harm her daughter when he accused her of it, as the world was watching that case, imo. So, he sits at long lunches speaking in a loud voice for all to hear the parents did it, leaks information on the case not based on proven facts to throw further suspicion on the parents and then they are made arguidos.
June 4th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Think the guy your talking about is Alipio Ribeiro.
Maria, it will take a long time but I believe the private detectives will unearth something in connection with Madeleines disappearance. Whether that will lead to the identification and conviction of the culprit is another matter.
The case is very quiet right now, or it would appear
June 4th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
I’d be surpirsed at anyone not using cards of some kind today but, as has been said, they’d simply follow their legal team’s advice once they were arguiodos, which is the correct thing to do. (The T7 were never arguidos.) Same with those questions that Kate is said not to have amswered. That will be because her lawyer told her not to. Up to then, the Mcs had been only too anxious to tell the police everything, even including details which could them seem more careless eg. telling them that Madeleine asked if they’d heard her and Sean crying the previous night. In other words, they said everything which might be helpful to the search whether or not it showed them up in a bad light. They don’t seem to have made any efforts to hide what they did, the number or type of checks etc. etc.
Cheryl, I read that article at the time of Amaral’s conviction. I don’t think anyone doubts that there was originally very sloppy police work. It won’t just have been because he criticised the British police that Amaral was sacked from the case, although one might add that it was hardly professional or sensible to make such a public statement at that moment, whatever his private thoughts were. It was the Portuguese who were in charge of the investigation. The police work was sloppy and he’d also allowed those appalling leaks to continue, including disgraceful stuff about GM not being Madeleine’s father, drugs sessions, wife-swapping, rubbish about the local priest, etc. etc. Those leaks almost dried up once Rebelo took over. And then there was the other chap who resigned, the spokesperson (forgotten his name) who clearly felt he didn’t want to be associated with the case because he wasn’t being properly briefed and the leaks were making his job impossible.
The whole thing is an absolute mess. No sign of Madeleine has ever been found and no positive or sound evidence of any crime being committed, by the Mcs or anyone else. However good their own private investigators, it’s doubtful if they’ll find anything now. Not that anyone would blame parents for still trying to find their child and one never knows. I hope I’m wrong.
June 4th, 2009 at 3:37 am
Grand Finale, you told me “there is a wealth of information out there” when I was lamenting of trying to sort out why or how the case was let go into shambles,imo, etc. I’m been doing research on some issues that nag at me and I ran across an article published re Amaral’s conviction and in that article, giving details on the Cipriano case, an interesting comparison was made between the Cipriano case and the McCann case and I quote (and post article’s link below):
“As was the case with the Madeleine investigation, the hunt for Joana was hindered because police failed to seal off the house where she was last seen.”
http://www.zimbio.com/Madeleine+McCann/articles/542/Madeleine+chief+detective+convicted+falsifying
June 4th, 2009 at 2:35 am
As we have seen in the case of the latest “Witch” in Germany a credit/debit card can be usefull for placing a person at a certain place at a certain time, hence providing a possible alibi or otherwise ?
June 3rd, 2009 at 11:23 pm
Don’t get this thread? Who cares if they have credit cards? They probably don’t as they have (or used to have) quite a sizeable income between them? They seem to live within their means, not that it’s anyone’s business but their’s…. I’m sure that they at least have debit cards. I expect they were advised not to hand over stuff by their legal team and let’s remember they were not suspects per se, but people of interest. And I’m sure the powers that be could quite easily get their bank details if they wanted to, by fair means or foul. Some bastard got hold of mine once!
June 3rd, 2009 at 10:16 pm
Hi Bat E!
I haven’t said anything about the credit cards business because I simply don’t know anything of the details or the background. (I probably don’t know anything about anything as most is just stuff presented by the media, apart from the Mcs’ own interviews. But I can’t really remember even what the lying media said about the credit cards!)
If the police had reason to suspect the Mcs, I’d be very surprised if they couldn’t access the facts but I honestly don’t know.
Could it be that there has to be some evidence against people before such details can be accessed? On the other hand, that wouldn’t explain the T7 stuff, so I really don’t know. Or maybe the details were confidential because they were arguidos? I simply know nothing!
Stig, if you’re reading this, anything to add? I know you’re good at digging up links.
Thanks for giving any details you find, Bat E.
June 3rd, 2009 at 9:02 pm
I don’t know C&C and Maria
There are full details of accounts and cards belonging to T7 so, would they not be covered by the same confidentiality?
I could understand if nothing was recorded for any of them.
I’ll post if I come across anything else.
June 3rd, 2009 at 8:14 pm
C and C
I think you’re probably right, especially as the Wiki reference to him talks about “the investigation” into Madeleine’s disappearance and that was Gonzo, not Chesty.
Yep. Agreed it’s sad that he could hate someone he doesn’t know as much as he obviously hates K and G. Enough not to be willing to leave the job to the police. (It’s not the first time he’s done that.) Enough to make the hate campaign a major focus of his life. I’m sure you’re right that the Mcs probably just flick him away like a fly! But I can understand their feelings at him hijacking Madeleine’s name for his “Foundation”.
June and C and C
I either missed that or I can’t call it to mind at the moment. Against Chesty? Against his petition? I know some at MW site said they were going to take some sort of action against Mcs (lost jobs etc.) Gonzo against the Mcs? Can’t think of anything else just now?? But quite likely I’ve just forgotten!
June 3rd, 2009 at 7:43 pm
Bat E Bird.. I read that to mean that the details weren’t recorded? Credit checks are so easy, can’t believe the PJ don’t know every little detail, but it all has to be confidential.
June, I don’t want my posts pulled again but yes!
June 3rd, 2009 at 7:06 pm
I think Grand Finale must have read about the lack of credit cards in the PJ files:
http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/P13/13_VOLUME_XIIIa_Page_3921.jpg
“No record of a current bank account is held. No credit cards or loans recorded…..”
Mods, the page I’m linking to contains some personal information but, as it’s freely available on several sites for anyone to read, I hope it’s OK to post it.
Moderator - should be ok
June 3rd, 2009 at 6:09 pm
Maria and C&C
Wasn’t there talk of another family taking legal advice?