Raymond Hewlett Is Today’s Madeleine McCann Victim
MADELEINE McCann Watch: convicted paedo Raymond Hewlett agrees to meet McCanns’ detectives…
The Sun screams: “Paedo Hewlett says he will talk”
Says Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for the McCanns - no longer suspects in the disappearance of their daughter Madeleine McCann but who, nonetheless, retain a PR to offer this no comment-comment on Raymond Hewlett:
“The investigators are pleased to hear that Mr Hewlett has agreed to speak to them.
“An interview with him will be arranged and will take place in due course.
“We will not be going into public detail about where or when that interview will take place.”
No public details. Privacy is all. So says the, er, spokesman to the media. And just in case you jump to conclusions that Raymond Hewlett is guilty, Clarence Mitchell for hire adds:
“Mr Hewlett has again denied any involvement in Madeleine’s abduction, and if it helps to eliminate him from the private investigation then he has done the right thing by indicating that he will speak to the investigators currently helping Kate and Gerry McCann.”
He has done the “right thing” in agreeing to speak to private investigators, having been fingered in the press in a story fed to the voracious media by… Well, any ideas?
Hewlett is tha man of whom the Mail says:
‘Maddie paedophile’ under investigation for four months
Yeah, Hewlett is the “Maddie Paedo“. He used to be just a paedo - now he has a celebrity edge.
Or as the Irish Herald puts it:
Madeleine detectives banned by hospital from quizzing suspect
Rymond Hewlett is linked to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann by a couple’s statement that they met him in Portugal and later felt uneasy, Clarence Mitchell, a media besotted with convicted peados (and not, sadly, with unveiling ones who are getting away with it) and a man who says Hewlett brought up Our Maddie in conversation, a chat that to the media’s mind made him “obsessed“.
It’s the Third Summer Of Maddie – and the media is ready for news and no news…
Update: Get a load of this:
In the spring of 1999, A British couple called Alan and Cindy Thompson were driving through Pakistan, in the very area that they’re now talking about as being bin Laden’s location. After driving for 11 hours on dirt roads they came to a checkpoint and were detained by armed Pakistani guards.
The next day the Dawn newspaper, one of the biggest newspapers in Pakistan, reported that this couple had found the secret lair of Osama bin Laden.
More interesting is that they reported that this location had been visited by US consulate officers, British, Australian, and Swiss ambassadors, and that it was guarded by a team of US commandoes.
After the couple were picked up by the British embassy they were invited to a garden party where all the British ambassadors and aid workers were bragging that they were stationed in the same area as bin Laden’s secret hideout.
After the couple got back home to England they saw a newspaper article calling for the capture of bin Laden. This was a few months before Clinton signed an executive order mandating bin Laden to be killed on sight.
The couple immediately contacted Scotland Yard in London; they contacted the FBI and the Pentagon and in every case got nothing. No response, no request for an interview. Nothing.
Madeleine McCann: The Third Summer of Maddy
Madeleine McCann: Three New British Suspects
Madeleine McCann: McCanns Want Hewlett To Co-operate
Pictures Of All The Madeleine McCann Suspects
Madeleine McCann: The Story In Pictures
Posted: 26th, May 2009 | In: Key Posts, Madeleine McCann, Media Comments (6) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments
- Kelley Lynch on Phil Spector’s Hair Performs With Ronettes
- June on The Pirelli 2010 Calendar In Artful Nudity (NSFW)
- June on Susan Boyle: World Divided Over SuBo And Lady Susan
- Tony on Daily Mail And Tax Payers’ Alliance Attacks BBC Over Its Free Trees For A Better Planet
- Cheryl on Susan Boyle: World Divided Over SuBo And Lady Susan
May 26th, 2009 at 8:09 pm
I don’t care in the slightest what happens to him or what he is accused of.
Well that’s not entirely true, I do care about what happens to him, and by the sounds of it, he’s in the process of getting some of it.
May 26th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
Anorak, that same thought has been in my mind on how careful Anorak has been to remind us of what we say about any cases in the UK or people involved. I think those two detectives are doing a great job and on the right track but I’m not convinced he is the right person. However, I do think he can be helpful to them. He is a paedo according to police records thus he then would think like one and hopefully share some ‘knowledge’ of what to look for or maybe he has heard of someone ‘of interest’ the Detectives haven’t run across in their files. The papers keep crucifying that man and he gets legal representation I fear any cooperation or help he could give would not be permitted by his lawyer.
I still say a tight lid needs to be put on this case right now.
May 26th, 2009 at 7:08 pm
3 - The man has form but that in itself proves nothing. inded, might it even prejudice any case agasint him that he is talked about so in the media? To suspect is one thing - to tell the media and use public opinion as your judge is another…
May 26th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
Forgive me if I can’t see a convicted paedophile who is wanted for questioning in the England & Ireland as a “victim” of anything.
He’s bloody lucky he managed to abscond from the sex offenders register so long.
May 26th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
Totally agree with every word, Cheryl.
The police seem to want to speak to this man anyway, in relation to events which have nothing to do with Madeleine McCann. BUT, in any case, there should be NO publicity. Disgraceful. And counter-productive, in terms of the search for what happened to Madeleine.
It’s grimly amusing that journalists are criticising our politicians for unethical behaviour. Fiddling expenses is not the only serious professional abuse. (Anyway, journos are reputedly not too hot in that respect either!)
May 26th, 2009 at 6:47 pm
He is not Madeleine McCann Victim he is the newspapers’ victim. It is time that someone puts a tight ‘lid’ on the ongoing investigation by the two UK Detectives and let them get their job done with no interference nor unwanted publicity. One would think with the expensive lesson the newpapers learned two years ago with printing rumours, innuendos, leaks, all without proof of truth behind them, they wouldn’t be so eager to print hearsay.