
Madeleine McCann: Raymond Hewlett Tells All
MADELEINE McCann Watch: Anorak’s at-a-glance look at Madeleine McCann in the news - Raymond Hewlett speaks out.
In the Mirror, Simon Wright brings us:
MADELEINE: KEY SUSPECT TALKS FOR FIRST TIME
Well, not exactly. Maddie spotter Raymond Hewlett, for it is he, has spoken frankly with Bild and briefly with the Sun.
Wright delivers the chat in bullet points:
Yes I’m a convicted paedophile
Yes I lived near Praia Da Luz
Yes I look like police drawing
Which means..?
Broken, frail, with only weeks to live, Raymond Hewlett is the man the McCanns fear could take the secrets of their daughter’s disappearance to the grave.
Fear. Could. Such are the facts. They have no proof. No evidence.
Says he:
“It’s obvious why they’re interested in me,” croaks Hewlett, 64. “But they can all think what they like. I didn’t kill the McCann girl. It’s the truth and it’s never going to change.”
So that’s that, then, no death bed confession. Can his morphine dose be upped?
The man jailed three times for sex attacks on girls today speaks out for the first time in a bid to clear his name amid the mountain of circumstantial evidence against him.
No, not for the first time.
Hewlett, who has been in hiding ever since he was named in connection with the case…
No, he’s not been in hiding since his name was given to the press. He’s been in hospital. The newspapers found him, as did doctors and the police. Such are the facts:
What’s more he is REFUSING to give an alibi for the night Madeleine, three, vanished.
Does he need one? the Mirro has called him “‘Maddie’ pervert“, a link apparently established by Team McCann, a man who says Hewlett brought up Our Maddie in conversation, a chat that to the media’s mind - get this -made him “obsessed” and lots of media opinion.
The word of tourists Cindy and Alan - who had previously located Osama bin Laden’s lair - caused the Mail to label Hewlett“Maddie’s Paedo”?
“I have an alibi but why should I share it?” he says, struggling for air with each syllable.
“There is a person who can say where I was that day, but why should I bring them into this? I’ve done nothing wrong. Why should I have to prove it? “My life’s been made a misery for something I know nothing about and a crime I’ve not committed.
“I’d take a lie-detector test. I’ll take any test you like. The only time I’ve seen Madeleine McCann is on missing posters. And I saw her on TV in a bar once. But I’ve never seen her in real life. Yes I’ve been to Praia da Luz, but not since 2002.”
If you were Raymond Hewlett’s alibi would you want him to make your name public?
But those claims contradict what former Scots Guard Mr Verran, 46, says Hewlett told him - that he was in and around Praia da Luz at the time Madeleine disappeared in May 2007.
Can it be proven?
The McCanns’ private detectives first became aware of father-of-six Hewlett in February this year when his name was given to them during local door-to-door inquiries.
Paedo!
Portuguese detectives told UK officers they were unaware of his existence until the McCann team uncovered his name.
Did they?
But bizarrely, Hewlett tells the Sunday Mirror he was visited twice by Portuguese police over the Maddie case and gave detectives a DNA swab and fingerprints, although he was never arrested or quizzed.
So no need for him to be swabbed again, then. So they didn’t think he was a suspect. Perhaps there was no proof. Perhaps you cannot arrest someone and charge them for a crime for which there is no evidence?
The McCanns’ investigators are unsure whether to believe him or the detectives in Portugal.
Not the key word “investigators”. Why not investigate?
He also says that local police helping in the search for Maddie visited him, wife Mariana and their children in the summer of 2007.
He says: “They checked that all the children living with us were ours. Our youngest girl looks a bit like her. But they saw everything was OK and they left.
“The police came again in August last year and told Mariana it was about the McCann girl.
They asked for me and Mariana told them I was in hospital. They came to see me and asked permission to take DNA and fingerprints. I was very sick and barely able to speak to them. They asked where we parked in the Algarve in the first half of 2007.
“I told them, ‘You know where we’ve been because you know us round there.’ “I knew why they were asking, because I’d seen the TV and newspapers. By then, that McCann kid’s photo was in every shop and supermarket you went in to. I’ve got previous convictions for child-sex crimes so my heart sank. I thought, ‘Oh no, here we go again.’
Again:
I was miles from the UK but it didn’t make any difference. I’d tried hard to build a new life. But the reality for me is that my past convictions will never go away. I have to put up with it because it’s always going to be this way. I gave them their DNA and fingerprints. I knew they were just doing their job but I was angry. I had enough to cope with. I had cancer and no money.”
Life on the road:
“We’d stop in various places and decide whether to hang around there,” he says. “It would depend on the weather and how easy it was to make money. I used to busk on the street, playing guitar. I can’t really play but people would give me money anyway.”
On the day Our Maddie vanished:
Hewlett says he was 60 miles away - in Vila Real de Santo Antonio - when Maddie was taken. Crucially, he says he cannot specifically remember being there that day.
“May 3 was a Thursday and I was always in Vila Real Santo Antonio on Thursdays,” he says. “My routine never altered. That’s 100km from Praia da Luz.
“If you asked people there if we were there on that day, I don’t know what they’d say. Maybe they can’t remember. If you ask them if we were normally there, they’d say yes. If it wasn’t for the fact that we were living the way we were, I wouldn’t be able to say so clearly that that was where I was.
“It’s only because of the way we live that I can say it. As far as I’m concerned, I don’t have to prove anything.”
With neither proof nor evidence, the law would doubtless agree:
“Our truck was our only vehicle. I didn’t have another vehicle to go anywhere in. It’s a high-profile vehicle. Once you see it, you never forget it. It was like that purposefully because I wanted people to see us. I didn’t want to be hiding.”
Want to see the video of Hewlett and his kids?
His youngest daughter Yanina bears a striking resemblance to missing Maddie.
A Blonde-ish child?
He says: “The friend who made the video would remember where I was two days earlier. She could tell anyone where I was. But I haven’t asked her and I don’t intend to. Why should I ask her? I don’t think I should involve anybody. Why should I keep dragging people in to this? I don’t like being in it, so why should I keep putting people’s names forward so that they get bothered with it too?
“I could ask her, but if she says no, then sorry, the answer is no. Then people will just have to carry on speculating.”
And that is that. For all the investigation and all the money the disappearance of Madeleine McCann centres on speculation, and continues to. There is one fact: a child is missing. It has yet to be established that a crime took place.
His voice so weak it is at times barely audible, today Hewlett is holed up in his cramped, sparce apartment, with Mariana, 33, and six young children.
Remember how the “sicko” wanted money to talk, to provide for his children?
“I would say to the McCanns that I know what it’s like to lose a child because it’s happened to me recently,” he says.
“I’ve been through hell and now I’ve got another hell which I don’t deserve. I know for a fact that I didn’t do anything wrong, but if people aren’t listening, what can you do?”
Shaking with pain, he repeats: “I didn’t kill the McCann girl.”
Leaving the investigators to investigate the other suspects and Madeleine McCann to remain missing…
Raymond Hewlett Saw Madeleine McCann Alive
Pictures Of All The Madeleine McCann Suspects
Madeleine McCann: The Story In Pictures
Madeleine McCann, Raymond Hewlett And Suspect Evidence
Posted: 14th, June 2009 | In: Key Posts, Madeleine McCann, Media Comments (12) | Follow the Comments on our RSS feed: RSS 2.0 | TrackBack | Permalink
Comments





June 16th, 2009 at 3:04 am
“May 3 was a Thursday and I was always in Vila Real Santo Antonio on Thursdays,”
Hmmm! not the only one if you recall the taxi drivers testimony, I wonder if he knows something ?
June 15th, 2009 at 1:56 am
Hewlett isn’t even a suspect, yet this &@& gets drawn out into some sort of meaning. I was wondering–if one dies after being falsely accused of a felony, while
media circles, does that men one goes to heaven/euphoria?
We need another suspect. We need to elect one.
June 14th, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Cheryl,
They should be able to, and its possible if there is any more shenanigans that could damage MM’s status and presumed wellbeing, her parents could request the Judge puts the whole saga ‘in camera’.
June 14th, 2009 at 9:20 pm
Great idea you have, June, having a Judge invoke a gag order on the Press. However, this is a private investigation not one being done by your Government or UK Police and Portugese Police have closed their files on it and wonder if the Court System would even get involved or could …?
June 14th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
June, you’re so right. As usual! lol. There needs to be silence from the McCs, investigators and media unless there’s something that desperately needs to be broadcasted. Let them get on with their job instead of telling us and, of course, whoever took MM (if, indeed, that’s what happened and it’s my view that it is) what they’re up to. Unless it’s all a big red herring in which case respect!
June 14th, 2009 at 8:50 pm
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Even if he is a ‘forthright, shining example’ convicted kiddy fiddler
June 14th, 2009 at 4:48 pm
C&C
I have noticed the McCanns have not said much if anything on the Hewlett connection, that did make me think it was a media money pot filler.
But I seriously believe now that it would be in the best interests of MM if there was a silence on proceedings, and I think Judge Eady ( the in loco parentis Judge) should insist, especially if there is a remote chance of her still being alive
June 14th, 2009 at 4:23 pm
“I didn’t kill the McCann girl.” says Hewlett. Well that is probably true, but it still leaves loads of things he could have done, other than kill her. After all - the Mccanns can’t think he killed her, because they think she is still alive and coming home, as promised, to the twins.
June 14th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
I agree June, the media loves a good ’search for a pae*o’ story. However I think he does know something even if he wasn’t personally involved.. Pae*os do gravitate towards each other and share information and details. Its what they do and the internet has made it so easy for them to group in areas.
and of course I STILL stick to my ’spotted stalked snatched’ opinion.
but aside from that it offends me so much to see him being portrayed as a victim in all this in order to beat up the McCanns. Any other time everyone would be calling for him to be castrated and strung up, not whinging about his human rights!
June 14th, 2009 at 3:24 pm
I think the whole Hewlett episode was a red herring/ money maker for the media.
Private investigators don’t need to interview him to see what makes him tick, thats a job for forensic and criminal pschyciatrists.
However eliminating him from the ’suspect’ list is a good idea, but time and energy needs to be put into finding what and who happened to MM.
Because if he is not guilty of any crime in this matter but is left to carry the can, then the real perpetrator gets away with ‘it’, whatever ‘it’ may be.
That would be folly
June 14th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
Hewlett+forthright are two words that don’t go together.
This man is a known and convicted pa*dophile whose whole live appears to be based on a tissue of lies and cruelty.
A shining example to the McCanns? more like a shining example of someone who should have been locked away permanently many years ago is more like it.
I’m shocked you can consider someone like even remotely honest. If you do then
I guess you must live your life on an alternative moral level.
June 14th, 2009 at 12:30 pm
Hewletts forthright statements concerning his whereabouts on the 3rd of May are a shining example to the Mccanns in how to coopoerate with a police investigation. Hewlett did not find it difficult to remember where he was that night, now over 2 years ago, and he did he need to rely upon the statements of others to corroborate his actions.
The Mccanns find it difficult to offer even the simplest of statements that concur concerning their limited movements within the confined space of the apartment or the Ocean Club.
This contagion of lapsed memories and contradicting statements was not confined to the Mccanns. Jenny Murat, Robert Murats mother, when publicly challenged by 2 independent witnesses about the alibi she had given to the police in which she exonerated her sons presence at the Ocean Club that night said:
“People who say he was outside Madeleine’s apartment that night are telling lies. I challenge them to tell Portuguese police what they’re telling the McCanns’ investigators. If they have the balls to come to Portugal they’re welcome to do so.”
The public gave money, they will not let this lie.